Kelly Martin's votes, Best so far Options

[Peter Damian]

Roger Davies - Support Appears likely to be ineffectual, a positive characteristic. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Rlevse - Support Willful disregard of own conflicts of interest indicates that this candidate has the arrogance and chutzpah to be nearly as bad as James Forrester in the role. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

White Cat - Support How better to deal with nationalistic edit warriors, but to put one on the ArbCom? [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

[GlassBeadGame]

Roger Davies - Support Appears likely to be ineffectual, a positive characteristic. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Rlevse - Support Willful disregard of own conflicts of interest indicates that this candidate has the arrogance and chutzpah to be nearly as bad as James Forrester in the role. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

White Cat - Support How better to deal with nationalistic edit warriors, but to put one on the ArbCom? [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Good for Kelly. Biting humor is the best use of the ArbCom election I've seen so far.

[Newyorkbrad]

Roger Davies - Support Appears likely to be ineffectual, a positive characteristic. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Rlevse - Support Willful disregard of own conflicts of interest indicates that this candidate has the arrogance and chutzpah to be nearly as bad as James Forrester in the role. [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

White Cat - Support How better to deal with nationalistic edit warriors, but to put one on the ArbCom? [[User talk:Kelly Martin|Kelly Martin]] 20:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Good for Kelly. Biting humor is the best use of the ArbCom election I've seen so far.

Well, that's easy for you to say; my perspective as one of the people who has to work with whoever is elected to get the work done might be a little different.

I enjoyed some of Kelly's mordant comments (minus the blatant personal attacks) myself, but IMHO they would better have been posted as a userpage commentary or a blog entry (as last year) than as actual votes.

[Kelly Martin]

I enjoyed some of Kelly's mordant comments (minus the blatant personal attacks) myself, but IMHO they would better have been posted as a userpage commentary or a blog entry (as last year) than as actual votes.

Your problem is obviously that you take Wikipedia too seriously.

And I'm not going to waste blogspace on commenting on ArbCom candidates. I prefer to save my blog for things that matter, like bread recipes and strange things about radios.