QUOTE(Anna @ Tue 2nd August 2011, 1:54am)
Well I suppose that certainly constitutes an opinion now, assuming (as I will) that you've read-up at least that thread at this stage. So you wouldn't even put it to him then? The mere name (ie a 'Phil Nash')
isn't the only connection is it? And why can't Phil simply deny it without defending the person in some way, and conjecturing on why he might do it (even did it - what's all the covert stuff about?)
Do you have a WP account incidentally? Sorry if you've answered that before.