FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
William Connolley demands topic ban be lifted -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> William Connolley demands topic ban be lifted, on Climate Change articles
It's the blimp, Frank
post
Post #1


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 734
Joined:
Member No.: 82



Right here. I am impressed by his imperious style. Obviously everyone should bow down before him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
SB_Johnny
post
Post #2


It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined:
Member No.: 8,272



QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Wed 5th October 2011, 1:36pm) *

Right here. I am impressed by his imperious style. Obviously everyone should bow down before him.

More power to him. The guy pretty much got banned for being a bit harsh on people who deserved it, from what I understand.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Guido den Broeder
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 425
Joined:
Member No.: 10,371



QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Thu 6th October 2011, 1:32am) *

QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Wed 5th October 2011, 1:36pm) *

Right here. I am impressed by his imperious style. Obviously everyone should bow down before him.

More power to him. The guy pretty much got banned for being a bit harsh on people who deserved it, from what I understand.

Really? When he was an administrator, the guy banned me from Wikipedia when I asked him not to editwar with another user over spelling. Others were treated in a similar fashion.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cla68
post
Post #4


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761



QUOTE(Guido den Broeder @ Thu 6th October 2011, 8:53am) *

QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Thu 6th October 2011, 1:32am) *

QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Wed 5th October 2011, 1:36pm) *

Right here. I am impressed by his imperious style. Obviously everyone should bow down before him.

More power to him. The guy pretty much got banned for being a bit harsh on people who deserved it, from what I understand.

Really? When he was an administrator, the guy banned me from Wikipedia when I asked him not to editwar with another user over spelling. Others were treated in a similar fashion.


Fortunately for WMC, Wikipedia doesn't have a "Child of Privilege-big-ego, artificially affected misanthropic, jaded, high-falooting" activist rule, or he would have been sent on his way long ago.

Here's the thing, I truly don't belive that WMC, Stephan Schulz, Kim Dabelstein Peterson, or Short Brigade Harvester Boris are really scientists, because I can't belive that true scientists would act as deceitfully, dishonestly, or as insecurely and cowardly as they act. If they are really scientists, I would like to know which universities they teach at to ensure that I don't send my kids to those bush league institutions. To be clear, I respect scientists who truly believe in man-made global warming but recognize that they might be wrong. The ones who don't are the ones who try to use Wikipedia to artificially socialize their positions.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post
Post #5


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212



QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sun 9th October 2011, 5:44pm) *

Here's the thing, I truly don't belive that WMC, Stephan Schulz, Kim Dabelstein Peterson, or Short Brigade Harvester Boris are really scientists, because I can't belive that true scientists would act as deceitfully, dishonestly, or as insecurely and cowardly as they act. If they are really scientists, I would like to know which universities they teach at to ensure that I don't send my kids to those bush league institutions. To be clear, I respect scientists who truly believe in man-made global warming but recognize that they might be wrong. The ones who don't are the ones who try to use Wikipedia to artificially socialize their positions.


You clearly haven't been in a seminar room-full of philosophers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cla68
post
Post #6


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 9th October 2011, 4:53pm) *

QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sun 9th October 2011, 5:44pm) *

Here's the thing, I truly don't belive that WMC, Stephan Schulz, Kim Dabelstein Peterson, or Short Brigade Harvester Boris are really scientists, because I can't belive that true scientists would act as deceitfully, dishonestly, or as insecurely and cowardly as they act. If they are really scientists, I would like to know which universities they teach at to ensure that I don't send my kids to those bush league institutions. To be clear, I respect scientists who truly believe in man-made global warming but recognize that they might be wrong. The ones who don't are the ones who try to use Wikipedia to artificially socialize their positions.


You clearly haven't been in a seminar room-full of philosophers.


Actually, I have. The scientists and philosophers who are the most humble in their advocacy are the ones I hope my kids have the good fortune to encounter. You want me to name some names? The Japanese ones probably won't have en.wikipediai entries.

This post has been edited by Cla68:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post
Post #7


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sun 9th October 2011, 2:02pm) *

QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 9th October 2011, 4:53pm) *

QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sun 9th October 2011, 5:44pm) *

Here's the thing, I truly don't belive that WMC, Stephan Schulz, Kim Dabelstein Peterson, or Short Brigade Harvester Boris are really scientists, because I can't belive that true scientists would act as deceitfully, dishonestly, or as insecurely and cowardly as they act. If they are really scientists, I would like to know which universities they teach at to ensure that I don't send my kids to those bush league institutions. To be clear, I respect scientists who truly believe in man-made global warming but recognize that they might be wrong. The ones who don't are the ones who try to use Wikipedia to artificially socialize their positions.


You clearly haven't been in a seminar room-full of philosophers.


Actually, I have. The scientists and philosophers who are the most humble in their advocacy are the ones I hope my kids have the good fortune to encounter. You want me to name some names? The Japanese ones probably won't have en.wikipediai entries.


Cough.

I never understood when scientists and philosophers some how gained a reputation for civility, when they were always a rather hostile and competitive bunch.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(Ottava @ Fri 14th October 2011, 4:27am) *

I never understood when scientists and philosophers some how gained a reputation for civility, when they were always a rather hostile and competitive bunch.

Hmmm - maybe they only seemed hostile because of whom they were dealing with? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)

Seriously, plenty of scientists have been noted for their charming and courteous behaviour. People who come to mind include William Herschel, Michael Faraday and Robert Bunsen.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)