 PC2012/RfC 1 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michaeldsuarez |
Post
#1
|
|
Ãœber Member  Group: Contributors Posts: 562 Joined: From: New York, New York Member No.: 24,428  |
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Ottava |
Post
#2
|
|
Ãœber Pokemon Group: Contributors Posts: 2,917 Joined: Member No.: 7,328 |
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Tue 4th September 2012, 1:01pm)  I never thought Pending Changes will fix anything. It just gives more power to a select few without any real need. If they wanted real reforms, they would focus solely on sourcing - no more sources less than a month old, only legitimate academic works, etc. That would get rid a lot of the crap and make it a real encyclopedia. Instead, Pending Changes wont really do anything but give a new award. Where is Malleus when we need him? |
|
|
|
| Retrospect |
Post
#3
|
|
Londoner born and bred Group: Contributors Posts: 263 Joined: From: London Member No.: 71,989 |
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 4th September 2012, 6:44pm) no more sources less than a month old Bloody silly idea. What's wrong with the latest issue of the British Medical Journal, ,say? Oh, I forgot, the British Medical Association don't do their own printing so they're crap! |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |