The Joe H. challenge to Goethean Options Rating

[victim of censorship]

=Hello pathetic and cowardly little man=
AKA...Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
As you know where I live, I know were you live as well, so I have committed to confined my augments with you to this cesspool and Wikpeidia Review so as not to have it spill out in the street and I hope you do the same.

Make no mistake, I have ABSOLUTELY no respect for your beliefs and methods of intellectual thuggery, bullying... You're a little man, pathetic and cowardly - intellectual, spiritual, and morally corrupt...your shameful ways of gaming Wikirulez, and other equally low games, in order to foist your rotten and flawed point of view, is reflective of your ethics I have seen on wikipeidia for years now. What is sad is no one calls you to task, with out getting wacked by your admin friends.

Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor.

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Any rate I be waiting for you there.

JoE

Addendum:
Looks like Goathed is crying to his little owl face turkey.. ...Tiptoety (T-C-L-K-R-D) ....
MAN UP GOETHEAN COME HERE AND SHOW WHY YOUR RIGHT!!

This is how Goethean "Mans up" with the help of his lacky wikiadmin buddy Acroterion

This post has been edited by victim of censorship:

[Somey]

Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, AnonIP 67.250.120.197 tried to add some "external links" to the article on Deborah Burlingame (T-H-L-K-D), who apparently is some sort of conservative 9/11 victims' advocate. Goethean reverted that, claiming that 67.250.120.197 was a "Joehazelton sock" and altering the relevant "SPI" page to reflect this claim. 67.250.120.197 may or may not be Mr. Victim (I'd guess not, since he's never posted here on WR from 67-anything), but in any event, Goathead then went on to accuse Spaceysrockets (T-C-L-K-R-D) of being "Joehazelton" as well, when Spaceysrockets voted to delete one of Goathead's pet articles on one of his new-age pals, Dawn Covington (T-H-L-K-D), and also tried to re-insert some criticism of another one of Goathead's pals, George Berkeley. Both 67.250.120.197 and Spaceysrockets were blocked, apparently at Goathead's behest.

My guess is that Spaceysrockets probably was Mr. Victim, who in turn was alerted to the 67.250.120.197 situation by the change to the SPI page. But he did nothing with the account that was actually "blockworthy" - I understand that they block Mr. Victim's known IP addresses pretty much reflexively, but I don't see anything that would even have warranted a CheckUser on that account. So, my conclusion is that both blocks were abusive.

Why don't they just make Goathead an admin/bureaucrat/checkuser/steward, if they're just going to do whatever he wants them to? It would save time... it looks like they don't even bother to check these things, they just do whatever he says. Meanwhile, he continues to spam WP with BS about these marginal new-age guru-types whom nobody has ever heard of (and, I suspect, deservedly so).

[victim of censorship]

Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, AnonIP 67.250.120.197 tried to add some "external links" to the article on Deborah Burlingame (T-H-L-K-D), who apparently is some sort of conservative 9/11 victims' advocate. Goethean reverted that, claiming that 67.250.120.197 was a "Joehazelton sock" and altering the relevant "SPI" page to reflect this claim. 67.250.120.197 may or may not be Mr. Victim (I'd guess not, since he's never posted here on WR from 67-anything), but in any event, Goathead then went on to accuse Spaceysrockets (T-C-L-K-R-D) of being "Joehazelton" as well, when Spaceysrockets voted to delete one of Goathead's pet articles on one of his new-age pals, Dawn Covington (T-H-L-K-D), and also tried to re-insert some criticism of another one of Goathead's pals, George Berkeley. Both 67.250.120.197 and Spaceysrockets were blocked, apparently at Goathead's behest.

My guess is that Spaceysrockets probably was Mr. Victim, who in turn was alerted to the 67.250.120.197 situation by the change to the SPI page. But he did nothing with the account that was actually "blockworthy" - I understand that they block Mr. Victim's known IP addresses pretty much reflexively, but I don't see anything that would even have warranted a CheckUser on that account. So, my conclusion is that both blocks were abusive.

Why don't they just make Goathead an admin/bureaucrat/checkuser/steward, if they're just going to do whatever he wants them to? It would save time... it looks like they don't even bother to check these things, they just do whatever he says. Meanwhile, he continues to spam WP with BS about these marginal new-age guru-types whom nobody has ever heard of (and, I suspect, deservedly so).

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

This post has been edited by victim of censorship:

[Somey]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

Well, some people will provide oral sex to just about anybody. But without more details about his personal life, we can't really say if he actually likes it or not...

This doesn't answer the question at hand, though, which is whether or not you (i.e., Mr. Victim) were the person behind the AnonIP 67.250.120.197 and/or User:Spaceysrockets. Also, we need a special term to describe these Goethean vs. Mr. Victim threads... something like "another Joeblock" or, if you like allusions to German philosophy, "another German philosophers suck thread."

[victim of censorship]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

Well, some people will provide oral sex to just about anybody. But without more details about his personal life, we can't really say if he actually likes it or not...

This doesn't answer the question at hand, though, which is whether or not you (i.e., Mr. Victim) were the person behind the AnonIP 67.250.120.197 and/or User:Spaceysrockets. Also, we need a special term to describe these Goethean vs. Mr. Victim threads... something like "another Joeblock" or, if you like allusions to German philosophy, "another German philosophers suck thread."

To answer your question about 67.250.120.197, that answer is no, that was not me.

Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethean allowed to to run like a wild feral animal on Wikipedia and be the abusive jackass he is???

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)

TO BAD you ENABLE GOETHEAN's abuse... so I have no respect.

TOO BAD you Use RanDoM cAPs ... .. so I have no reshpekt.

To bad you don't ban Goethean

[Alison]

Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethean allowed to to run like a wild feral animal on Wikipedia and be the abusive jackass he is???

[...]

To bad you don't ban Goethean

For what? Being a dick? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) There wouldn't be many editors left if bannination was being handed out for that. What has he specifically done that requires admin action? Seriously - I've not really followed the whole Goethean thing (largely because of your own attitude, to be honest, and the fact that I'm trying to disconnect from WP) - at least point me to some *genuine* misdeeds here. Yes, he constantly cries to admins to have your many, many socks banned - and some that clearly aren't yours - I've stepped in before over other innocent editors, as well you know. Oh, and he's got some New Age bee in his bonnet (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif)

But other than that, and your personalized campaign against him - what exactly is there?? Help me out here.

[victim of censorship]

Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethean allowed to to run like a wild feral animal on Wikipedia and be the abusive jackass he is???

[...]

To bad you don't ban Goethean

For what? Being a dick? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) There wouldn't be many editors left if bannination was being handed out for that. What has he specifically done that requires admin action? Seriously - I've not really followed the whole Goethean thing (largely because of your own attitude, to be honest, and the fact that I'm trying to disconnect from WP) - at least point me to some *genuine* misdeeds here. Yes, he constantly cries to admins to have your many, many socks banned - and some that clearly aren't yours - I've stepped in before over other innocent editors, as well you know. Oh, and he's got some New Age bee in his bonnet (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif)

But other than that, and your personalized campaign against him - what exactly is there?? Help me out here.

WP:CIVIL... WP:AGF.... WP:HARSSMENT...and simple fair play. The simple fact is there is no governance or fair review on Wikipedia??? Just street gangs, warlords and jagoffs (like those who enable GOATHED) and who have no fear of due to the admins that protect the jagoffs like Goathed. I have some history (which was removed) and see how the much respect there was...

Read and learn. Just a little note all of this was removed from Wikipedia by the lovely jackass admins in violation of GNU Free Documentation License to hide the total abuse of me by the ackass admins. In my my attempt to see the my friend Bio was treated fairly, I was treated like subhuman and in the end was abused by a wild eyed partisan democrat in total violation of WP:COI Rob Gamaliel, and his friend Goethean.

I spit on those enablers who help make Wikipedia evil. DAM right it's personal. WIKIPEDIA IS A CESSPOOL OF EVIL and those who enable it are the scum of the earth. I will live a 100 years to see wikipedia diminished to a JOKE and repudiated for the crater of sewerage it is.

This post has been edited by victim of censorship:

[Alison]

Ok, so I got the gratuitous insult, etc. I was expecting that. But all I'm seeing here is some dispute back in - what - 2006? And, in fairness, it looks like you got picked on, too (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/unhappy.gif) I wasn't even an admin back in those days.

Anyways - this is now. What exactly can I do here? You've not given me much reason to even chide the guy, let alone banhammer him! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif) Point out where he's repeatedly breaking the rules, show me the stuff & I'll try to deal with it. From what I can see, he's got some sort of hair-trigger JoeHazelton thing going on, where he sees your socks just about *everywhere* and uses that as a justification to shut down other editors. Now *that* is not cool. I can watch our for and possibly deal with that sort of thing. But what else?