The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Someone is VERY ANGRY, About what, I couldn't say
Rating  3
Eva Destruction
post Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Push the button
post Tue 30th March 2010, 10:32pm
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed 25th Mar 2009, 8:53am
Member No.: 10,967

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 11:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.

QUOTE
You cannot view this diff because one or both of the revisions have been removed from the public archives.

There may be details in the deletion log.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Tue 30th March 2010, 10:34pm
Post #3


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Push the button @ Tue 30th March 2010, 11:32pm) *

QUOTE
You cannot view this diff because one or both of the revisions have been removed from the public archives.

There may be details in the deletion log.



QUOTE
- This is to stay here but also to be moved onto main page! This again proves my point from yesterday, i simply was reverting double edit and no good administrators like tim song reverted it, in this story you will find out exactly what i mean and what is long overdue fixing on wikipedia: I do not know where to start because the list is never-ending, problem with this user goes back all the way to 2005. This will not be post to enjoy, so bear with us, you are about to read nothing but the truth, supported with undeniable proof.

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy no privacy on wikipeedia according to antandrus & those who support him. Antandrus goes public with people's real names, here he reverted the name: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=241207095 mirandamir reverted it back, then antandrus BLOCKED THE TALK PAGE, on purpose, knowing he will provoke situation, then he uses those statements to prove his point how he is innocent, how he is only doing his "job". ANTANDRUS MAIN REASON BEHIND BLOCKS IS TO CREATE PROBLEMS! Antandrus is wikiholic, he admitted if he does not revert something within 12 hours he will not feel good. In real life he has no life, no real job. On wikinews he claims he has phd, he claimed same thing here (REMEMBER ESSJAY LIES & SIDE EFFECTS?) en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Antandrus but i'd like to see prove with his real name. I hope you will not take anything down here, thats against policies, we're simply trying to make our point clear. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340162039

did he say thanx for edits and contributions, instead he wrote
good editor is dinking around, what kind of language is that,

certainly not civil, - against any wikipedia policities! Assuming good now blocked contributer (thanx to u know whom) chessmasta made one bad edit, but made 100 good edits, the one bad edit is huge crime according to antandrus, even arguin on talk page is crime, even if proven right. -

Reverts of good edits: - Antandrus has been vindalizing crosswikis & other webpages on the internet, not to mention putting his link on other pages just so he can promote his (like controler site, that has now been closed for good, good news) lowly websites.

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=...2&oldid=1100001
in this edit, it's clear mr antandrus has no knowledge of world

history, according to him churchill never participated in any wars, instead of correcting spellin, he reverted, later he did it BUT with bowed head, only after he was reported to administrator for revert violations.

Antandrus not once said thank you for good edits, never warned,

only blocked:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340178696
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340162039
did he say thanx for edits and contributions? instead he wrote

- dinking around, what kind of language is that, certainly it's not civil, - against any wikipedia policities! Assuming good now blocked contributer (thanx to u know whom) chessmasta made one bad edit, but made 100 good edits, the one bad edit is huge crime according to antandrus, even arguin on talk page is crime, even if proven right. -

Reverts of good edits: - Antandrus has been vindalizing crosswikis & other webpages on the internet, not to mention putting his link on other pages just so he can promote his (like controler site, that has now been closed for good, good news) lowly websites.

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=...2&oldid=1100001
in this edit, it's clear mr antandrus has no knowledge of world

history, according to him churchill never participated in any wars, instead of correcting spellin, he reverted, later he did it BUT with bowed head, only after he was reported to administrator for revert violations.

antandrus, the racist:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ant...ico_Croatian.3F

- it's clear hates croats, does not treat them right as all human races ought to be. We are all one people, nobody, including nations are above another, created equal in the eyes of the Creator with right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.

Antandrus has been suspended multiple times on other crosswikis,

banned globally:

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C...tions/antandrus
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Cont...tions/Antandrus
Now, im sure he & those who suppor thim will say accounts created

for purpose of vandalism only but that is not true, it's clear that is antandrus, you can check pattern of his reverts, very rarely he'll say why he reverts, which is another violation of wikipedia policites. many of the above edits are constructive and many are not, so if this was just vandal, he'd simply revert everything & call things stupid, just to get laugh, there is no trollin activity, besides accounts were opened for very long time, usually vandal gets blocked within an hour, again that's clear evidence it was antandrus who was blocked for vandalism.

Over the years we have not seen any justice on wikipedia when it

comes to reporting administrators, one protects another & that's also violation, I doubt anybody will listen to me here but Im writing this for posterity that's the main reason. It would be best to block antandrus forever, that's wishful thinking, as im sure he'll find tons of excuses. Even founders like jimbo told him to stop it but he convinced him he's not doing anything wrong, so jimbo allowed him (another violation, proof was not looked at, pre/determinism is bad) to continue with his reverts, name calling and so on, the list has no end. -

Additional administratorship violations: - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=341598302 READ WELL WHAT WAS REPORTED LAST YEAR. This goes hand in hand. - Antandrus reverted this many times, reason? of course easy one, he simply said done by banned user, but he never mentioned the - fact that other administrators replied to it, accepted it, archived it. Nobody touched it. - Because it was complaint about him, TRUTH WAS WRITTEN & ANTANDRUS DOES NOT LIKE ANY TRUTH ON HIM! Imagine goin to court, judge immediately rules in favor of person he knows - just because it has nice eyes, NOT EVEN TALIBAN DOES IT!

I CAN GO ON FOREVER WITH MANY OTHER COMPLAINTS AGAINST THIS EVIL

INDIVIDUAL, KIND - OD ADMINISTRATIVE VANDALS, but what's the point, you guys will protect your own, - I've never seen impartial decision on wikipedia, there was never justice. - But at least, you are to remember what antandrus did, he is not to prosper or get - any new position on any wikia sites. He is evil man, who calls people by their names, - instead of by their account name.

Even kindergarten kid knows march 5 is when dictator joseph stalin died,

- yet antandrus reverted it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=281530015 - later another user reverted it back but still it was reverted because administrators - are always "right" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=281548370, - this is sad case of lack of impartiality on wikipedia. Even when things are 100% - correct antandrus will revert without explaing why, well ladies & gentleman, here you have ode to uncaring vandal administrator with no regards, no respect for - people's efforts, good work!!!

Some time ago administrator left this note

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=340190258, yet antandrus reverted other administrator's instructions as well, no regards for nothing & anythin!

Only recently on other wiki he kept on calling people by their names, never adheres to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy to him its all joke but if u delete this post

surely it will exist forever & then some, if you delete it, means you dont know, dont want to approach justice, because there is zero here, but assuming somebody was to violate your policy, you'd all scream how could they do such thing, we never do it!!!

Thus, this makes you pure hypocrites! You will not defand innocent, but when its your skin on the line, then it's big problem, so be neutral look into this as you swore to do your job, do it good once! It will be tough for you

dealin with justice!: Blockin this page so only reginstered users is not right, newyorkbrad above says its because of vandalism, yet that's still against policites to keep it locked for so long, no excuse, u always have too many but nobody outside wikipedia buys it, u r aware no university allows wikipedia at their campuses!? justly so! Antandrus should not be administrator, editor, nothin!The law of physics & nature is right, within gravitational field: what goes up will come down, HARD WITH BANG SOONER OR LATER dont think time will fix it, u r still dreamin!!! My words are all justified, always will be! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Privacyproblemsbydavidtroll (talk • contribs) 21:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
the fieryangel
post Tue 30th March 2010, 10:38pm
Post #4


the Internet Review Corporation is watching you...
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,990
Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm
From: It's all in your mind anyway...
Member No.: 577



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.


Antandrus (T-C-L-K-R-D) is definitely a Wikiholic (self-admitted)...but he's generally reasonable, as far as a completely indoctrinated cult member can be. I completely believe that he has a PhD in Musical composition, given the musicological thought presented in his classical music articles...and completely understand why he decided to get out of that field to make some real money...So, definitely not "EssJay" Material at all.

It would seem, however, that this angry person probably doesn't speak English as a first language and also probably doesn't think outside of "black/white" shadings...

...Oh well, we'll find out more soon enough....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Tue 30th March 2010, 10:58pm
Post #5


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.


The guy posting it is the "Antandrusis___" name creator. He was posting on meta but that was stopped quickly.

QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:38pm) *

Antandrus (T-C-L-K-R-D) is definitely a Wikiholic (self-admitted)...but he's generally reasonable, as far as a completely indoctrinated cult member can be. I completely believe that he has a PhD in Musical composition, given the musicological thought presented in his classical music articles...and completely understand why he decided to get out of that field to make some real money...So, definitely not "EssJay" Material at all.

It would seem, however, that this angry person probably doesn't speak English as a first language and also probably doesn't think outside of "black/white" shadings...

...Oh well, we'll find out more soon enough....


Actually, I used my access and logged into the music database he's been using. Many of his pages contain at least a few phrases with 4-8 words in a row lifted with no changes. I went straight down his article list and hit approximately an 80% rate of this happening down to the 35th page. I got tired after that point.

I investigated after someone else on WR mentioned that he lifts his material from that encyclopedia. Its not hard to make content when you take it right from an oxford encyclopedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Tue 30th March 2010, 11:10pm
Post #6


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,815
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



I believe the implication is that this person (the one complaining about the perhaps-somewhat-objectionable Antandrus (T-C-L-K-R-D) ) is in fact PIO (T-C-L-K-R-D) , who appears to be from Northern Italy, and seems to have been interested at some point in adding material to WP to support claims that Italians were victims of "ethnic cleansing" by Yugoslav partisans in the final months of World War II. He also seems to object to the use of the word "football" to refer to American or Australian-rules football.

Difficult to be absolutely certain, though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Wed 31st March 2010, 12:25am
Post #7


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.



Another day in the wiki-ocean of shit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:14am
Post #8


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 2:25am
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



Is this the "Gogi" going after Antandrus on WQ? huh.gif

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=...v&oldid=1097196
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:15am
Post #9


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Wed 31st March 2010, 1:25am) *

QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.



Another day in the wiki-ocean of shit.

I'd have thought you of all people would feel some kind of bond with this guy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:00pm
Post #10


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 6:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.


This is the punishment for making it the encyclopedia "anyone can edit", and I relish these moments.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Text
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:13pm
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun 1st Nov 2009, 3:08pm
Member No.: 15,107



Gogi is better known as "George Reeves Person" or "Squidward vandal". At the end of 2005 he was using the accounts User:Vesa and User:Projects. He came back later as User:Boxingwear. He's someone posting from Chicago and has hated Antandrus for years, he used to maintain an attack website about him.

I don't think he has anything in particular against Antandrus besides the fact that he enjoys insulting him, he just has anger management issues.

He used open proxies and infected zombie computers in early 2006 to launch a massive attack to spam images of Squidward, a character from the Spongebob cartoon, on multiple pages at once.

I don't think PIO even knows Antandrus, he's just a banned guy who is hot-headed and doesn't like editors like DIREKTOR.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:21pm
Post #12


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Text @ Wed 31st March 2010, 2:13pm) *

Gogi is better known as "George Reeves Person" or "Squidward vandal". At the end of 2005 he was using the accounts User:Vesa and User:Projects. He came back later as User:Boxingwear. He's someone posting from Chicago and has hated Antandrus for years, he used to maintain an attack website about him.

I don't think he has anything in particular against Antandrus besides the fact that he enjoys insulting him, he just has anger management issues.

He used open proxies and infected zombie computers in early 2006 to launch a massive attack to spam images of Squidward, a character from the Spongebob cartoon, on multiple pages at once.

I don't think PIO even knows Antandrus, he's just a banned guy who is hot-headed and doesn't like editors like DIREKTOR.

Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Text
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:26pm
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 491
Joined: Sun 1st Nov 2009, 3:08pm
Member No.: 15,107



QUOTE
Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?


Obviously not! They don't have trouble makers, and therefore pages which document their behavior are not needed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:26pm
Post #14


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Wed 31st March 2010, 1:21pm) *

Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?


Britannica doesn't have conversations. They have deadlines and don't even really bother to look at what is submitted. That is why the fact checking done a while back between EB and Wikipedia found that Wikipedia was more up to date and accurate than Britannica was.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:36pm
Post #15


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Text @ Wed 31st March 2010, 2:26pm) *

QUOTE
Do you suppose Britannica ever has conversations like this?


Obviously not! They don't have trouble makers, and therefore pages which document their behavior are not needed.

You know that Britannica is no longer the sombre stack of dull volumes sold by salesmen with a strange resemblance to Mormon missionaries, but a knock-off of Wikipedia complete with "anyone can edit", right? The only difference is that they operate a strict version of flagged revisions so the "poop" vandalism never makes it to the live site.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Wed 31st March 2010, 1:42pm
Post #16


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



To quote Rodney Dangerfield: call me when dinner's over! hrmph.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post Wed 31st March 2010, 2:29pm
Post #17


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 3:38am
Member No.: 5,309

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 9:15pm) *

QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Wed 31st March 2010, 1:25am) *

QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.



Another day in the wiki-ocean of shit.

I'd have thought you of all people would feel some kind of bond with this guy.


Kinda similar to how serial killers never work in pairs, neither do wiki-obsessives. Too much unstable ego for one room to hold.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BelovedFox
post Wed 31st March 2010, 2:47pm
Post #18


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 6:54pm
Member No.: 16,616

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tarc @ Wed 31st March 2010, 2:29pm) *

QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 9:15pm) *

QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Wed 31st March 2010, 1:25am) *

QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 30th March 2010, 10:18pm) *

Can anyone work out what this guy is so upset about? Something tells me WR can expect to be graced by his wisdom fairly soon, whatever it is.



Another day in the wiki-ocean of shit.

I'd have thought you of all people would feel some kind of bond with this guy.


Kinda similar to how serial killers never work in pairs, neither do wiki-obsessives. Too much unstable ego for one room to hold.


You know, that would make a great book, I'm just sure someone has already thought of it smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post Wed 31st March 2010, 2:51pm
Post #19


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Wed 31st March 2010, 1:36pm) *

The only difference is that they operate a strict version of flagged revisions so the "poop" vandalism never makes it to the live site.

That's a great idea! Someone ought to suggest that for WP! I hear they already do it on de.wiki so it shouldn't take long to get it going on en.wiki...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Wed 31st March 2010, 2:51pm
Post #20


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(BelovedFox @ Wed 31st March 2010, 3:47pm) *

QUOTE(Tarc @ Wed 31st March 2010, 2:29pm) *

Kinda similar to how serial killers never work in pairs, neither do wiki-obsessives. Too much unstable ego for one room to hold.


You know, that would make a great book, I'm just sure someone has already thought of it smile.gif

Someone could write a screenplay about two serial killers who work together. Quentin Tarantino, maybe. Who knows, maybe one of WR's regulars could produce it? Oh, wait…
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 1 18, 2:04am