FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
MyWikiBiz is back from the dead! -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

> MyWikiBiz is back from the dead!, ...kinda like Sinbad
thekohser
post
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



Well, what do you know? An article about my ol' company Wikipedia Review has been trotted out for another try at permanence in Wikipedia. I wonder how this one will pan out.

Looks awfully self-referential to me, so far. What's with the "Internal Links" section?

And, what's with the "Open Letter to Jimmy Wales" from Scott Baradell in the "External Links" section? I mean, Scott's a friend of mine, but that blog post doesn't even mention Wikipedia Review.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
thekohser
post
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



The surge continues unabated.

It's got to be a bot, right?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 23rd August 2011, 1:22pm) *
It's got to be a bot, right?

It's likely. Someone is messing with you. Has anything happened to MWB's direct hits?

There are now more than 100 bots operating on en-WP. Any of them could be easily modified to
automatically inflate the hit-counts of any article. Because no one ever talks about what they
are doing with their WP bots, we might never know.

Yet another area of Wikipedia that is completely opaque and obscured from its users. After looking
at the edit histories of thousands of articles, I am convinced that WP's mad admins are deliberately
using bots to falsify edit-counts across the board. Since 2009 the preponderance of edits to ALL
articles (except major battlefields) have been bot edits such as reformats, or trivial edits by complete
nobodies which added little or no information.

When people see my edit-date analysis, there will be much sadness.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
thekohser   MyWikiBiz is back from the dead!  
thekohser   Well, what do you know?
thekohser   And down she goes, victim of the WP:CSD#G4. All ...  
Joel Leyden   Well, what do you know? An article about my ol...  
Somey   Y'know, what you really ought to do is change ...  
LamontStormstar   thekohser How exactly was your plan to work if so...  
Somey   And how did you expect billing to work when you...  
gomi   And how did you expect billing to work when you...  
Somey   This could be a great business, because it self-su...  
thekohser   How exactly was your plan to work if somebody wan...  
Skyrocket   Maybe you could use the Barbershop model: If someb...  
LamontStormstar   Wouldn't the underpaid foreigners then go into...  
thekohser   Wouldn't the underpaid foreigners then go int...  
guy   How easy a time are they going to have talking on...  
wikilove   It's funny, but so many of my Cheetos-fingere...  
thekohser   And you should have kept it on the down low (read...  
Somey   Besides, had I gone "secretive", how lon...  
wikilove   I'm a generally honest person. Going in ...  
wikilove   Wouldn't the underpaid foreigners then go int...  
Somey   It's funny, but so many of my Cheetos-fingered...  
thekohser   Looks like our pal Cyclopia has taken up editing t...  
Milton Roe   Looks like our pal Cyclopia has taken up editing ...  
Sarcasticidealist   It's also short for nickname. It's quite a...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='Milton Roe' post='220557' date='Tue ...  
thekohser   It's also short for nickname. It's quite ...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='Milton Roe' post='220557' date='Tue ...  
thekohser   [quote name='thekohser' post='220572' date='Tue 9...  
Somey   Looks like our pal Cyclopia has taken up editing t...  
CharlotteWebb   So, is it standard BLP procedure to look up what ...  
thekohser   Score +1
dtobias   There's also Nick at Nite.  
Trick cyclist   Finding definitions of nick? This is much more fu...  
CharlotteWebb   "On a squash court, the nick is where the wa...  
Trick cyclist   In my mind "squash" refers to a yellow ...  
CharlotteWebb   Is this some sort of troll, Ms Stockings? Paraph...  
Trick cyclist   Is this some sort of troll, Ms Stockings? Parap...  
Viridae   In my mind "squash" refers to a yellow...  
thekohser   Why do you think the lead paragraph of
KnightLago   Why do you think the lead paragraph of
thekohser   Anybody have any idea what happened a few days ago...  
radek   Anybody have any idea what happened a few days ag...  
thekohser   I'll take credit for that one. Your note wa...  
radek   [quote name='radek' post='282838' date='Wed 10th ...  
cyofee   Looks like someone with a big proxy list is trolli...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)