The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Raul654 biased... say it ain't so...., admin abusively blocking
guy
post Fri 28th December 2007, 7:06pm
Post #21


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



I hadn't realised that there is a picture of Durova, Lar and friends on Wikipedia.

[imgx]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/There%27s_no_cabal.png[/imgx]
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Fri 28th December 2007, 7:18pm
Post #22


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Moulton @ Thu 27th December 2007, 6:24am) *

...exacerbated by leaks in the foundation.


Not to mention, "leaks from the Foundation"!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Fri 28th December 2007, 10:32pm
Post #23


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(guy @ Fri 28th December 2007, 11:06am) *

I hadn't realised that there is a picture of Durova, Lar and friends on Wikipedia.

[imgx]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/There%27s_no_cabal.png[/imgx]


Which brings to mind my favorite Wikipedia policy page.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Fri 28th December 2007, 11:25pm
Post #24


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 28th December 2007, 10:32pm) *

Which brings to mind my favorite Wikipedia policy page.

I see ^demon (who has of course resigned) and Mercury (resigned but at RfA) are still on the list.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Timp
post Fri 28th December 2007, 11:48pm
Post #25


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri 24th Aug 2007, 4:29pm
Member No.: 2,673



QUOTE(Miltopia @ Thu 27th December 2007, 12:39am) *

It's not only ok, but responsible in my book, to block (real) POV-pushers and the like. But it needs to be done by uninvolved admins. Why can't Raul654 use dispute resolution like everyone else?


It's a shame so many don't realize that being generally good at content doesn't justify breaking basic procedural safeguards. "Drama" is one way of putting it, "widespread loss of respect for the neutrality of Wikipedia's processes" is another.

Also, the content could be a lot better, it's all written to set people straight rather than simply to inform a reasonably intelligent person. I'm looking now at the article on Global Warming -- does the scientific community really agree that natural phenomena have had a cooling effect over the last half century that has been countered and overcome by human behavior, or were two factors picked out of the bunch to make a point? I'm sure these are smart people who basically know their stuff, but you have to ask why this is where the project has plateaued.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KamrynMatika
post Fri 11th April 2008, 4:04am
Post #26


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 625
Joined: Sun 24th Jun 2007, 1:59am
Member No.: 1,776



He's at it again http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adm...#Improper_block. This thread was linked in the discussion, as a matter of fact.

This post has been edited by KamrynMatika: Fri 11th April 2008, 4:04am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Fri 11th April 2008, 4:26am
Post #27


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Wikipedia's Blocking Policy)
Administrators must not block users with whom they are engaged in a content dispute; instead, they should report the problem to other administrators. Administrators should also be aware of potential conflicts of interest involving pages or subject areas with which they are involved.

See this example of such a questionable block.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Achromatic
post Fri 11th April 2008, 4:49am
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun 16th Dec 2007, 10:32pm
From: Washington State
Member No.: 4,185

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(guy @ Fri 28th December 2007, 4:25pm) *

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 28th December 2007, 10:32pm) *

Which brings to mind my favorite Wikipedia policy page.

I see ^demon (who has of course resigned) and Mercury (resigned but at RfA) are still on the list.


BTW, your favorite policy page is currently up for Miscellany For Deletion. Unsurprisingly, you can tell who is an admin and who is not, by who has voted Keep and who has voted Delete.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kyaa the Catlord
post Tue 15th April 2008, 12:19pm
Post #29


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 10th Dec 2007, 5:22pm
Member No.: 4,108

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Achromatic @ Thu 10th April 2008, 10:49pm) *

QUOTE(guy @ Fri 28th December 2007, 4:25pm) *

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 28th December 2007, 10:32pm) *

Which brings to mind my favorite Wikipedia policy page.

I see ^demon (who has of course resigned) and Mercury (resigned but at RfA) are still on the list.


BTW, your favorite policy page is currently up for Miscellany For Deletion. Unsurprisingly, you can tell who is an admin and who is not, by who has voted Keep and who has voted Delete.


Hahahah. I added their cat to my userpage. I'm not an admin. tongue.gif

Hilarious.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Tue 15th April 2008, 1:00pm
Post #30


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(Kyaa the Catlord @ Tue 15th April 2008, 1:19pm) *



Hahahah. I added their cat to my userpage. I'm not an admin. tongue.gif

Hilarious.


Ooooh, you'll get blocked hun! Or at least told off smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Tue 15th April 2008, 1:06pm
Post #31


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



But that would not be a difficult block, so it would have to be done by an admin who doesn't even care.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Tue 15th April 2008, 1:17pm
Post #32


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



Lol! Plenty of those around, some would say smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Tue 15th April 2008, 1:28pm
Post #33


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



They need a Hallmark motto: When you care enough to block the very best.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lar
post Tue 15th April 2008, 2:25pm
Post #34


"His blandness goes to 11!"
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,116
Joined: Wed 26th Dec 2007, 6:04pm
From: A large LEGO storage facility
Member No.: 4,290



QUOTE(Kyaa the Catlord @ Tue 15th April 2008, 8:19am) *

QUOTE(Achromatic @ Thu 10th April 2008, 10:49pm) *

QUOTE(guy @ Fri 28th December 2007, 4:25pm) *

QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 28th December 2007, 10:32pm) *

Which brings to mind my favorite Wikipedia policy page.

I see ^demon (who has of course resigned) and Mercury (resigned but at RfA) are still on the list.


BTW, your favorite policy page is currently up for Miscellany For Deletion. Unsurprisingly, you can tell who is an admin and who is not, by who has voted Keep and who has voted Delete.


Hahahah. I added their cat to my userpage. I'm not an admin. tongue.gif

Hilarious.

I removed it for you. If you readd it, you're on your own. Personally it seems a silly way to get LULZ but your mileage may vary.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kyaa the Catlord
post Tue 15th April 2008, 2:38pm
Post #35


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon 10th Dec 2007, 5:22pm
Member No.: 4,108

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Tue 15th April 2008, 7:00am) *

QUOTE(Kyaa the Catlord @ Tue 15th April 2008, 1:19pm) *



Hahahah. I added their cat to my userpage. I'm not an admin. tongue.gif

Hilarious.


Ooooh, you'll get blocked hun! Or at least told off smile.gif


I've been blocked before... probably will be again. Not a big deal. Its not like the world revolves around Wikipedia....

Seriously, blocking people for adding themselves into lulzworthy cats is silliness. tongue.gif

Utter silliness. smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 3:47am