FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Statistical decline Reported -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Statistical decline Reported, Long awaited demise of Wikipedia at hand?
nobs
post
Post #1


#2242 most prolific contributor of out of 1 million+ WP users
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 575
Joined:
From: North America
Member No.: 16



The Foundation list is in a tizzy. Internal statistics for the English Wikipedia have not been compiled since October 2006. Independent analysis shows the activity of the Wikipedia community appears to have been declining during the last 6 months. New users are off 30%

QUOTE
Having absorbed traffic from all previous contenders, we are running up against an insurmountable wall.... That very traffic that we absorbed is no less than the unwashed masses...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
blissyu2
post
Post #2


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined:
From: Australia
Member No.: 5



It also seems that their rate of unproductive edits has climbed to over 20%:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_...sis#Revert_rate
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nobs
post
Post #3


#2242 most prolific contributor of out of 1 million+ WP users
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 575
Joined:
From: North America
Member No.: 16



QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Tue 9th October 2007, 10:17pm) *

It also seems that their rate of unproductive edits has climbed to over 20%:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_...sis#Revert_rate

60% of "normal edits" are made by pimply faced Admins. Like that's news. We always knew you had to be a member of the club.

This post has been edited by nobs:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post
Post #4


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(nobs @ Wed 10th October 2007, 5:47am) *

60% of "normal edits" are made by pimply faced Admins.

How do you know what they look like?


QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 10th October 2007, 6:18am) *

there were other things that happened during that timeframe too - like the whole BADSITES brouhaha, Citizendium, and the totally unfair re-banning of User:Blissyu2, each of which probably caused at least 200,000 WP users to quit in disgust and revulsion.

And of course the banning of Poetlister and friends, who were making over 50% of the best edits.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)