QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th June 2011, 5:02pm)
For openers, do you have anything juicy on the topic of Slim's socking, either Sweet Blue Water or Sunsplash? Or on banal "Whole Foods Market"-style genre of monikers she invents?
No mention of Sweet Blue Water or Sunsplash or anything about SlimVirgin socking that isn't about defending her from accusations (in 2007) or her kvetching about being falsely accused.
From kirill.lokshin at gmail.com Tue Apr 3 15:35:52 2007
From: kirill.lokshin at gmail.com (Kirill Lokshin)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:35:52 -0400
Subject: [Arbcom-l] Query regarding sockpuppeting admin
On 4/3/07, charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com
<charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Steve Dunlop wrote
> > I have left notes explaining the situation and the arbcom's position on
> > it on Henrygb's talk page and on AN/I.
> You left out the bit we discussed most, which was that there was absolutely no urgency to do anything here.
> I deprecate this strongly. The statement contains assertions of _fact_ on sockpuppetry. This is a most unfortunate form of phrasing. Maybe it was the girlfriend's account. But in any case this seems to go way beyond what we had agreed to do.
> So, you have probably run a good editor off the site, now. When I suggested that we might be asking Henrygb to hand in the mop, I meant that. This is (otherwise) someone we should be happy to have editing.
> I think it is extremely important that we handle these matters in a collegiate way.
I think it's also important to avoid having our hands tied because
someone won't cooperate. Henrygb has been given ample opportunity to
provide some explanation or comment on the sockpuppetry charge;
instead, he's decided to accuse us of being part of some shadowy
SlimVirgin Atrribution conspiracy (all while studiously avoiding
saying anything -- anything at all -- as to the charge itself). The
fact that he won't discuss the issue with us should be a point against
him, not a free ticket out of being sanctioned for what appears --
barring any explanation from him -- as quite inexcusable behavior.
In any case, I'll point out that it was Henrygb who insisted on having
everything done in public. Given his demands that we conduct all
discussion on his talk page, posting the charges on AN/I is quite fair
game, I think.
I am curious about any emails relating to the identity of Iridescent.
Looked for all ready, the bloke doesn't even trust the other inmates with his identity.