| |
|
  |
Jayjg MIA |
|
|
| Sarcasticidealist |
Thu 23rd April 2009, 10:31pm
|

Head exploded.
     
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 23rd April 2009, 7:26pm)  As I understand it, however, there remains a distinct list containing both current and former Arbcom members. True? Yes, along with checkusers and oversighters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GlassBeadGame |
Thu 23rd April 2009, 11:52pm
|

Dharma Bum
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981

|
QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 23rd April 2009, 4:21pm)  QUOTE(Son of a Yeti @ Thu 23rd April 2009, 11:17am)  QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 22nd April 2009, 10:18am)  While there is no specific evidence that Jayjg is paid to edit Wikipedia, he is a different sort of beast than those we normally deal with. He is much, much more interested in maintaining his long-term ability to influence his articles of interest than he is in the other dramas of the community. If I understand you correctly, you're saying his a voice of an Israeli organization, possibly even a government one?  To the best of my knowledge, there is no evidence of any kind regarding Jayjg, his identity, or his affiliations. My comment should be read thusly: given a longitudinal study of his editing habits, his involvement in wiki-politics, his on-wiki associates, and other incidental evidence, Jayjg presents a profile very different from (e.g.) SlimVirgin, JzG, Ryulong, MONGO, or other assorted wiki-obsessives. His skill in manipulating people without crossing clear lines, his studied use of threats, his willingness and ability to act through others (both admin and regular editors), his astonishing skill at gaming the system, and -- perhaps most importantly -- his willingness to simply disappear from the conversation for long periods, would seem to indicate someone of a more professional nature than most wiki editors (who seem to have escaped from the Island of Misfit Toys or something). But just so no one accuses me of slinging any slurs: I am not accusing Jayjg of being an "agent" of any organization. Whether or not he acts like one is a matter for well-informed individuals to conclude on their own. I agree with this assessment from this high level of gamesmanship subject to two significant lapses. First, his completely amateurish commitment to the "Allegations of Apartheid"series of articles and second, his miscalculation of the reaction his attack on CharlotteWeb would bring followed by his SlimVirgin like defense on wikien-l .
|
|
|
|
|
|
| trenton |
Sat 25th April 2009, 6:15pm
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12th Sep 2008, 10:21pm
Member No.: 8,237

|
QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Wed 22nd April 2009, 7:52pm)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Messiani...ioning_the_leadI'm wondering about trying to bring some neutrality to the Messianic Judaism article at this point I wonder who will watch my back? well, whoever volunteers is sure to become a bureaucrat and checkuser too just like the last guyThis post has been edited by trenton: Sat 25th April 2009, 6:15pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cla68 |
Sun 3rd May 2009, 10:05am
|
Postmaster
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined: Fri 18th Apr 2008, 5:53pm
Member No.: 5,761
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 8:34am)  QUOTE(Heat @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 1:40pm)  Kirill has proceeded to the voting stage with his proposals intact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...oposed_decisionAmazing. That is one hard-assed Russian. I must assume that Jay is frantically emailing all and sundry, begging for help. Perhaps he will finally pester Jimbo for special treatment one time too many, and (hey presto) the vote will be unanimous.  Jayjg is toast. The question now is, how does Wikipedia keep another Jayjg from happening again? SV\HFO, do you have an opinion on the issue? This post has been edited by Cla68: Sun 3rd May 2009, 10:06am
|
|
|
|
|
|
| JohnA |
Sun 3rd May 2009, 10:26am
|
Looking over Winston Smith's shoulder
     
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,171
Joined: Sun 30th Jul 2006, 9:56pm
Member No.: 313

|
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 8:05pm)  QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 8:34am)  QUOTE(Heat @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 1:40pm)  Kirill has proceeded to the voting stage with his proposals intact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...oposed_decisionAmazing. That is one hard-assed Russian. I must assume that Jay is frantically emailing all and sundry, begging for help. Perhaps he will finally pester Jimbo for special treatment one time too many, and (hey presto) the vote will be unanimous.  Jayjg is toast. The question now is, how does Wikipedia keep another Jayjg from happening again? SV\HFO, do you have an opinion on the issue? Why would you want SV to comment? She's definitely part of the problem and not the solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Saltimbanco |
Sun 3rd May 2009, 4:44pm
|
Who watches the watchmen?
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 590
Joined: Mon 29th May 2006, 9:15pm
Member No.: 228

|
What fun!
Kiril's resolutions may indeed yet fall short, but I think there is a sea-change going on here.
Jayjg is almost certainly employed by an organization dedicated to promoting and defending Israel, but I think it is likely that he has successfully completed his assignment with regard to Wikipedia: Israel's legitimate fear, early on in the history of Wikipedia, was that it would become a broadly accepted and anti-Israeli information source. This could be countered in either of two ways: first, by making it pro-Israeli rather than anti-Israeli; or second, by keeping Wikipedia from becoming a broadly accepted information source. And I think clause two has been accomplished.
There will no doubt be ongoing pro-Israeli propaganda efforts at Wikipedia, but I think that the bigger guns have decided that there are more pressing issues at this point. Within a few weeks Jayjg will be working on setting a rationale by which Americans might think that an Israeli attack on Iran is a good thing or arguing that Israel's foreign minister isn't really a violent racist in spite of him being a violent racist. Or any number of other initiatives.
It's too bad Wikipedia's credibility was essentially allowed to collapse before the Jayjg problem, which has been obvious for several years, was addressed. In all likelihood, Jimbo made some sort of an exchange to promote and protect Jayjg. And he's gotten what he deserves for it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EricBarbour |
Sun 3rd May 2009, 11:30pm
|

blah
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Saltimbanco @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 9:44am)  Jayjg is almost certainly employed by an organization dedicated to promoting and defending Israel, but I think it is likely that he has successfully completed his assignment with regard to Wikipedia: Israel's legitimate fear, early on in the history of Wikipedia, was that it would become a broadly accepted and anti-Israeli information source. This could be countered in either of two ways: first, by making it pro-Israeli rather than anti-Israeli; or second, by keeping Wikipedia from becoming a broadly accepted information source. And I think clause two has been accomplished. Thing is, they did a terrible job of this. It took years, and has resulted in considerable embarrassment for Zionist groups such as CAMERA, simply by being suspected of supporting Jay and Co. whether such support was real or not. If I had to do this, I would have just paid some starving Indian or Pakistani students to run proxy servers with scripts to auto-vandalize Wikipedia articles. Probably would have been cheaper and quicker. In all likelihood, Jay and his little butt-buddies decided to whitewash Israel all by themselves, then found out later that someone would support them.....they still act like amateurs! QUOTE In all likelihood, Jimbo made some sort of an exchange to promote and protect Jayjg. This has been suspected for a looong time. QUOTE how does Wikipedia keep another Jayjg from happening again? Depends on the Arbcom. If the kosher boys figure out how to get a couple people onto Arbcom, they might have a chance. But their reputation is in tatters, and the Gaza attacks in January have done immeasurable harm to Israel's reputation. The usual "you're an antisemite, you're a Holocaust denier" crap is not very effective anymore*. So it would be a superhuman job. Wanna make sure it doesn't happen again? Encourage Arabs to edit en-wiki. *(Except when used against cowardly Washington politicians...)This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Sun 3rd May 2009, 11:36pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EricBarbour |
Sun 3rd May 2009, 11:56pm
|

blah
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Heat @ Sun 3rd May 2009, 4:39pm)  I'm sorry, I do have to object to the use of phrases like "kosher boy". I'm not sure what you mean but if you're saying anyone who is Jewish (or even anyone who is a religious Jew who keeps kosher) shouldn't be on ArbComm then you're completely off base, particularly when you consider that the guy writing Jayjg's sentence is a "kosher boy" named Kirill Lokshin. You're misunderstanding me. Jews ought to be welcome on Arbcom, along with everyone else -- as long as they're not the Jayjg variety of sociopathic liars. There are Arab Wikipedians who would run a similar POV scam, if they had adequate support. Ever been to Saudi Arabia? I have. If you try to bring a map or book showing or talking about Israel into that country, the airport censors (of which they have many) will black out all mention of Israel with large black permanent markers. Along with unclad women and other things that conservative Muslims find horrifying. Imagine what a group of Saudis, supported by their government, would do to en-wiki, given half a chance..... I suspect the only way to keep Jayjg scandals from happening again would be to have a balance of Arabs and Jews on Arbcom. (Sometimes I wonder what's going on in the Arabic Wikipedia. Thanks to the magic of Google Translate, you can read their article about Israel. You be the judge.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |