The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Interpretation of WMF fund banner data, caught in multiple lies
thekohser
post Thu 18th November 2010, 3:34am
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
I enjoyed this blog post, so I thought I'd share it here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Thu 18th November 2010, 2:36pm
Post #2


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696
Cute. It's sorta like framing the guilty subject: the research supports the conclusion they want, but not clearly enough for their liking, so they lie about what the research supports.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Fri 19th November 2010, 10:47pm
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs


Presumably you all saw this.

Nothing got more click-thrus than Jimmy, begging pathetically.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 5 13, 3:13am