Beta M?, Former US Federal prisoner Options Rating

[tarantino]

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psy-op/message/2544?var=1

I am anarchist prisoner from Russia in Amerikan gulag. Thanx
a lot for your paper, even though I disagree with a lot in
it, it's important to remain oneself in these hard times
without becoming reactionary. In solidarity, fighting for my
idea of better world.

VolodyA! V. Mozhenkov
Federal Correctional Institution Elkton
Lisbon, Ohio

http://www.ainfos.ca/02/may/ainfos00417.html

VolodyA! V Mozhenkov, 06429-046 DB, FCI Elkton,
Enslaved by USA, LISBON OH 444 32-0010 UNITED STATES

Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator

Name Register # Age-Race-Sex Release Date Location
VLADIMIR MOZHENKOV 06429-046 30-White-M 10-04-2002 RELEASED

From the St. Petersburg Times, November 17, 2000

Porn Man Gets Jail

HELENA, Montana (AP) - A Russian man has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for downloading pornographic pictures - some involving children - to a computer at a local college.

Vladimir Mozhenkov was arrested last December after federal agents traced more than 37 pornographic images posted on the Internet to one of Carroll College's computer labs.

Mozhenkov admitted to having child pornography on several diskettes and using computers at the college to distribute child pornography.

At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography.
He faces deportation after serving his sentence.

[TungstenCarbide]

... At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography.

He faces deportation after serving his sentence.

Anyone know where he's editing from nowadays?

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Tue 6th March 2012, 3:39pm

[carbuncle]

... At the time, Mozhenkov was a lab monitor working at the college, where he was enrolled. Mozhenkov pleaded guilty in August to possessing child pornography.

He faces deportation after serving his sentence.

Anyone know where he's editing from nowadays?

According to his MeetUp page, he lives in Moscow. That's why he attends meetings in London.

This post has been edited by carbuncle: Tue 6th March 2012, 3:45pm

[mbz1]

Here's a single article http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pages/index....cts=noredirects it created.

[dogbiscuit]

I'm surprised that the Mainstream Press hasn't picked up on a convicted child pornographer, expelled from the United States, being allowed to ply his trade on a 503c funded servers in Florida myself.

[carbuncle]

I'm surprised that the Mainstream Press hasn't picked up on a convicted child pornographer, expelled from the United States, being allowed to ply his trade on a 503c funded servers in Florida myself.

I'm surprised that no one at WP has jumped on this yet. The longer they wait, the worse it will look when it hits Fox News....

[EricBarbour]

Good find, Tarantino, thanks. I'll write him up, he's not very important but the child porn gives it that
extra smidgen of, um, flair.

[Peter Damian]

I'm surprised that the Mainstream Press hasn't picked up on a convicted child pornographer, expelled from the United States, being allowed to ply his trade on a 503c funded servers in Florida myself.

I'm surprised that no one at WP has jumped on this yet. The longer they wait, the worse it will look when it hits Fox News....

Well David Fuchs is reading as we speak, so won't be long. Possibly.

[Peter Damian]

Ah lovelyy

On donkey punch:

::::::: The double standards of people amaze me. "This image is of poor quality" is a good argument not to use this particular image, but it's not an argument to use no image, and since there are no better images currently, there's simply no argument as far as i can see. And yes, Wikipedia SHOULDNOTBECENSORED, but it's a much broader argument here. What is at stake is whether or not one chooses to report on everything that is encyclopaedic or only on those things which are safe and approved by some PR committee. I believe that we shouldn't stress over how Wikipedia looks like, after all everybody is Wikipedia, if somebody comes here and sees that the image doesn't look good (which i think is false, it's a reasonable quality image) they have all the right in the world to create a better one. The fact that it's a hoax, however, makes a real video unlikely (i wouldn't advise it), so it may actually be quite good to have '''this''' animation. [[User:Beta_M|VolodyA! V Anarhist]] <small>User:Beta_M</small> ([[User talk:Beta_M|converse]]) 17:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=476150531

[TungstenCarbide]

Good find, Tarantino, thanks.

Ditto, thanks for the good work yet again.

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Tue 6th March 2012, 7:56pm

[Peter Damian]

Good find, Tarantino, thanks.

Ditto, thanks for the good work yet again.

Seconded. And here is his article on 'child love' for Anarchopedia (which even the anarchists eventually deleted).

Pedophilia (or paedophilia, originally Greek παιδοφιλια; paidophilia) is a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. While the exact definition varies by context, it commonly refers to the medical definition defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. The correct term for an attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.
Those who meet the criteria set above are classed as pedophiles. Common usage do not follow the strict medical definitions of an adult or teen who is attracted to prepubescent children, but often refers to any adult who is attracted to, or has sexual contact with, any person under the age of consent, or the age of majority (often 16-18 in most western countries).
In many societies and cultures, the term pedophile is highly stigmatized and represents an image of an evil, callous monster. This spurs many self-identified pedophiles to adopt names such as boylover, minor-attracted adult, girllover, and childlover, among others, to assist in differentiating themselves and their values from this stereotype.
While pedophiles have made great contributions to past societies, their influence is often ignored or their attraction to children is greatly played down.
One of the dearest fantasy held in the paedophile sub-culture is that of the fantasy island - the secluded island community where paedophiles and children roam free, enjoying total sexual freedom. The idea behind this fantasy is the suggestion that away from the oppressive teachings of these organised religions, those who feel a sexual attraction towards the pre-pubescent can indulge their basest desires and, in doing so, also achieve some form of enlightenment... that the freedom to establish their much maligned and negated altruism will result in some kind of mass overhaul of opinion amongst the general population.
However, that's why it's called a fantasy. Because it'll never happen. The irrational hatred felt towards paedophiles is something that few are prepared to even acknowledge as being irrational, let alone try to combat.
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?titl...lia&oldid=33996

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Tue 6th March 2012, 8:11pm

[HRIP7]

Thanks, Tarantino. It's nice to know that Wikimedia has attracted quality people to Commons, curating their adult media collection, and invigorating the Foundation's Wikilove programme:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...ot_sex_barnstar
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hot_sex_barnstar.png
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...ot_Sex_Barnstar
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_tal...ot_Sex_Barnstar
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...ot_Sex_Barnstar

[Michaeldsuarez]

Seconded. And here is his article on 'child love' for Anarchopedia (which even the anarchists eventually deleted).

Pedophilia (or paedophilia, originally Greek παιδοφιλια; paidophilia) is a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. While the exact definition varies by context, it commonly refers to the medical definition defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. The correct term for an attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia.
Those who meet the criteria set above are classed as pedophiles. Common usage do not follow the strict medical definitions of an adult or teen who is attracted to prepubescent children, but often refers to any adult who is attracted to, or has sexual contact with, any person under the age of consent, or the age of majority (often 16-18 in most western countries).
In many societies and cultures, the term pedophile is highly stigmatized and represents an image of an evil, callous monster. This spurs many self-identified pedophiles to adopt names such as boylover, minor-attracted adult, girllover, and childlover, among others, to assist in differentiating themselves and their values from this stereotype.
While pedophiles have made great contributions to past societies, their influence is often ignored or their attraction to children is greatly played down.
One of the dearest fantasy held in the paedophile sub-culture is that of the fantasy island - the secluded island community where paedophiles and children roam free, enjoying total sexual freedom. The idea behind this fantasy is the suggestion that away from the oppressive teachings of these organised religions, those who feel a sexual attraction towards the pre-pubescent can indulge their basest desires and, in doing so, also achieve some form of enlightenment... that the freedom to establish their much maligned and negated altruism will result in some kind of mass overhaul of opinion amongst the general population.
However, that's why it's called a fantasy. Because it'll never happen. The irrational hatred felt towards paedophiles is something that few are prepared to even acknowledge as being irrational, let alone try to combat.
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?titl...lia&oldid=33996

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_and...to_love_and_sex

Wikipedia's "Anarchism and issues related to love and sex" article conveniently leaves out information on the views that people such as Beta_M have on children and sex. I wonder how the anarchists would react if a reliable-sourced section on those sorts of beliefs were added to the article. Will they feel embarrassed, ashamed, or offended? Will they try to censor such information? Maybe someone should preform a "social experiment" in order to find out.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Tue 6th March 2012, 8:32pm

[tarantino]

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

[mbz1]

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

Yet it is not blocked on a few other wikis http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/...a+M&blocks=true

tarantino, how you tracked it down, if I may ask please?

[radek]

Beta_M has been blocked on wp and commons by Geni.

Reading through all this I got one question:

Why is Wikipedia Review doing so much of Wikipedia's dirty work???

Paolo, Beta M and that's just recent, going back further Essjay, Mantanmoreland etc.

If WR was the evil trolls that Prioryman et al makes it out to be, it would sit quiet on this stuff. But it doesn't. It's about time for some damn kudos here. It really is that they are so useless and incompetent that they need someone who doesn't even like them to tell them, "here, this is how you do it right".

[EricBarbour]

Why is Wikipedia Review doing so much of Wikipedia's dirty work???

I wouldn't call it "their dirty work", so much as I would call it "public embarrassment". If WR people really
WERE doing their dirty work, these little problems would be communicated to the Wiki-Fools privately,
and the cover-up would be done quietly. That's how they want it.

Instead, by having people post the atrocities on WR, the Fools look all the more like fools. In public.
Plus, I document the whole thing for posterity (think about a book). Instead of being just
another quietly-covered-up disaster, it adds to the pile of public disasters and embarrassments.

Geni is (IMO) an evil little shit. You should see his block record. He's a homeopathy freak, and why the
pro-science WP contingent tolerates him is a bizarre mystery. He's been there since early 2004,
so he's part of the "landscape". Like a sewer treatment plant that leaks into the river occasionally.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Wed 7th March 2012, 2:37am

[tarantino]

tarantino, how you tracked it down, if I may ask please?

He identifies as "VolodyA! V Anarhist" on his user pages.

These anarchists IDed him four years ago, but the internet collective seemed to have forgotten it until now.

[TungstenCarbide]

These anarchists IDed him four years ago, but the internet collective seemed to have forgotten it until now.

"In 2008 he started freedomporn.org & posted up pics of himself wanking off in a pink dress.
warning:http://www.freedomporn.org/smut/File:Volodya_-_pink_dress_cock_02.jpeg"

[EricBarbour]

Put him on Arbcom! They deserve him!