Leak Summaries, The Choicest Cherries Options

[Sololol]

I was pondering the sage words of Roger Davies, that all of the released information is cherry-picked to show things in a certain light, and realized that he is correct! All of these leaks are selected to confirm peoples' worst fears about the arbs and Jimbo! Dear friends, WR is better than this! What we need is biased information in a digestible format. Like the Pentagon Papers or chicken entrails, these leaks require learned men (or man-children) to properly explain their significance (or lack of) to the unwashed masses. Future generations of wiki-warriors and sociopaths should not be denied the benefit of our obsessively cultivated Wiki-drama knowledge. So pick a leak you know something about. Tell us why it's interesting, what it reveals, and why that one Arb is a two-faced pawn of Jimbo who should never have banned you for putting Goatse.cx on the Queen Mother's page. Whatever. My dreadmasters at J-Street command me to take on the CAMERA leak, which I'll get to at some point.

[Rhindle]

Why doesn't one of the arbs release a thread, unedited except for private info of course, showing them acting in a professional manner and acting impartial without any gossip? Of course there could be examples of that but there sure is a lot of "cherry picking" confirming what many already thought. Malice seems to be just cutting and pasting these leaks but at least making the effort to redact sensitive information and trying to make it more readable. I don't see him selectively editing out comments to purposely make the arbs or Jimbo or anyone else come out looking like jerks. If they come out that way, that's just how it is.