Giano takes it to the limit, blocked for "incivility" Options

[Peter Damian]

This was absolutely predictable. The other side know that there will be people needling Giano, so are taking a flexible attitude. But Giano knows this too, and is determined to push things to the very limit.

You have begun to interest me, stalking is a game that two can play...I'm wondering why the Arbcom accepted a case from you with such speedy, almost suspicious, alacrity - if I were one of those Arbs I would now be very worried, because your edits have started to interest me too, first one on Masturbation - now there's a sunject and a half. As I said I am now very interested indeed.You see John I am still far from happy about the IRC case, and I will get to the bottom of it, if not here then elsewhere. Giano (talk) 23:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:John254"

I understand why you could be upset at john, but this is a little disapointing. I saw it as some kind of threat - you should know that taking things elsewhere isn't what we do here. I personally have a lot of respect for you and I honestly thought you were way above this - just take a step back and think about things for a minute. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You have absolutely no respect for me at all so don't be so bloody hypocritical. By elsewhere I mean of course IRC, isn't that where you and all your buddies and the Arbs hang out, and where if we want to discover the truth concerning Wikipedia we are all forced to go these days? You see Ryan, I will get to the bottom of this, the very bottom, and if one way draws a blank, I shall go in another direction. I know the truth, all I have to do is prove it. Giano (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[Moulton]

I reckon it persists because of a systemic lack of ethics in our culture.

[Jonny Cache]

I reckon it persists because of a systemic lack of ethics in our culture.

That would imply that what goes on in Wikipedia is completely homogeneous with what goes on in the whole of "our culture".

As epidemiology goes, an explanation like that is not a very effective form of differential diagnosis.

Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)

[jorge]

I reckon it persists because of a systemic lack of ethics in our culture.

That would imply that what goes on in Wikipedia is completely homogeneous with what goes on in the whole of "our culture".

As epidemiology goes, an explanation like that is not a very effective form of differential diagnosis.

Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)

Not "our culture", internet culture, which is something close to anarchy.