The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Nasal sex
Peter Damian
post Fri 16th January 2009, 1:08pm
Post #1


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



From Sidaway's talk page
QUOTE

I have nominated Nasal Sex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard0612 23:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

How bizarre. I no longer remember why I created that one. --TS 23:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll have my friend oversight the offending edit for you.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

What a very nasty and obnoxious thing to say. --TS 08:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Fri 16th January 2009, 6:26pm
Post #2


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Fri 16th January 2009, 6:08am) *

From Sidaway's talk page
QUOTE

I have nominated Nasal Sex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard0612 23:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

How bizarre. I no longer remember why I created that one. --TS 23:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll have my friend oversight the offending edit for you.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

What a very nasty and obnoxious thing to say. --TS 08:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


Nasal sex. Explained by William Fleiss and perhaps obtained from Heidi Fleiss. Wikipedia has an article on the first, but --incredibly-- not the second. Philistines.

http://scribalterror.blogs.com/scribal_ter...s-freud-an.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Fri 16th January 2009, 7:09pm
Post #3


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Fri 16th January 2009, 1:08pm) *

From Sidaway's talk page
QUOTE

I have nominated Nasal Sex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard0612 23:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

How bizarre. I no longer remember why I created that one. --TS 23:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll have my friend oversight the offending edit for you.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

What a very nasty and obnoxious thing to say. --TS 08:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


The log pertaining to the article suggests that at one time all it contained was "Sex via nose", which, if you think about it, is as descriptive an explanation as you could want. Naturally, no-one - not even Tony Sidaway - wants to be associated with sexually explicit nasally-inclined articles so the Fat Man's kind offer to have it wiped shouldn't be sniffed at.

My only hope is that the noses alluded to in the article were of a human origin rather than, say, those belonging to our quadrapedal cousins. It's just that you never know with these people, and we all know how things can get blown out of all proportion.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Fri 16th January 2009, 8:03pm
Post #4


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 16th January 2009, 2:09pm) *

My only hope is that the noses alluded to in the article were of a human origin rather than, say, those belonging to our quadrapedal cousins. It's just that you never know with these people, and we all know how things can get blown out of all proportion.


Do these quadrapedal cousins include dead horses? It's said that I like to beat them, possibly indicating tendencies for S&M-style necro-zoophilia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Fri 16th January 2009, 8:27pm
Post #5


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



People have claimed to observe Amazon river dolphins, ummm, penetrating blow holes of other dolphins. This not-so-safe-for-work artistic interpretation is from the Sex Lives of Animals exhibit at the Museum of Sex.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Fri 16th January 2009, 8:43pm
Post #6


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 16th January 2009, 2:27pm) *
People have claimed to observe Amazon river dolphins, ummm, penetrating blow holes of other dolphins.

Well, irrespective of that, I'd better not find out about any of our members doing that sort of thing to a horse, alive or dead! mad.gif Especially as regards the snout area, which is generally considered to be the "cutest" feature of the typical equine, along with the mane.

OTOH, I guess it's not so uncommon for people do disgusting things with raw steaks, so maybe we could make an exception for cows, as long as it doesn't get really excessive or anything.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wales Hunter
post Wed 21st January 2009, 3:06am
Post #7


Hackenslasher
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 869
Joined: Sun 30th Dec 2007, 11:29pm
Member No.: 4,319

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



A redirect for deletion debate:


QUOTE

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Red...ry_15#Nasal_Sex

Nasal Sex → Sexual intercourse

I can find no information relating to this (I feel strange for simply having checked...) and the redirect seems like nonsense to me! Richard0612 23:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

* see Homosexuality_in_animals#Amazon_Dolphin.Geni 23:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

* * well.... redirect to that... also, I need to erase that mental image from my mind >.< --Enric Naval (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

* * * Delete. Why would anyone search for nasal sex? --Shadow master66 (talk) 20:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

* * * * While I don't wish to speculate the reason why, it was seached for 70 times in novemeber 2008 and 100 times in october.Geni 22:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

* * * * * Planet Earth never ceases to amaze me... Richard0612 15:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


The redirect was created by Tony Sidaway

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&action=history





User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Giggy
post Wed 21st January 2009, 3:23am
Post #8


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon 31st Mar 2008, 3:02am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,552

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE

I have nominated Nasal Sex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Richard0612 23:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
How bizarre. I no longer remember why I created that one. --TS 23:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I'll have my friend oversight the offending edit for you.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...on_of_Nasal_Sex
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Wed 21st January 2009, 3:41am
Post #9


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



See the related discussion that starts here:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=151438

Perhaps it could be moved to this thread.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Wed 21st January 2009, 6:22am
Post #10


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(tarantino @ Tue 20th January 2009, 9:41pm) *
See the related discussion that starts here:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=151438

Perhaps it could be moved to this thread.

Done!

It's important to keep all nose-sex-related content in one place, so that people don't somehow get the wrong idea.

I feel all yucky just thinking about it... yecch.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Wed 21st January 2009, 11:55am
Post #11


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Wed 21st January 2009, 3:06am) *

A redirect for deletion debate:
QUOTE

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Red...ry_15#Nasal_Sex

Nasal Sex → Sexual intercourse

* * well.... redirect to that... also, I need to erase that mental image from my mind >.< --Enric Naval (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)



I'm delighted to see that one "Enric Nasal Naval" has stuck his nose into this rather sordid affair.
Sorry. I'll get my coat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lolwut
post Wed 21st January 2009, 12:54pm
Post #12


Photobucket staff are Marxists.
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue 20th May 2008, 9:27am
Member No.: 6,235



Hey, at least no one's considered aural sex yet...

wink.gif

But sounds like someone on Uncyclopedia thought of it. I guess that means I wasn't the only one to independently imagine the concept.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Wed 21st January 2009, 1:05pm
Post #13


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(lolwut @ Wed 21st January 2009, 5:54am) *

Hey, at least no one's considered aural sex yet...

wink.gif

But sounds like someone on Uncyclopedia thought of it. I guess that means I wasn't the only one to independently imagine the concept.

It's a Ferengi thing. Their ears are stand-ins for their you-know-whats. And we all know that Ferengi are just Medieveal Jews without the stereotypical noses. So it's back to that again. Freud and Fleiss and "go blow yourself" evilgrin.gif And if you prick us, do we not bleed?

Soon we'll have covered all the fleshbulbs and the holes and crannies. And the critters.

Gotta be something new under the sun. bored.gif sleep.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Wed 21st January 2009, 1:55pm
Post #14


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 21st January 2009, 1:05pm) *
Soon we'll have covered all the fleshbulbs and the holes and crannies. And the critters.

Gotta be something new under the sun. bored.gif sleep.gif

You mean our sun? Well, Europa is showing some promise, though probably only for fans of jellyfish and squid and other yucky things. For something really new you're talking about some other sun somewhere. My current fave is Gamma Cephei. Seems like a good candidate for some (in)decent silicon-based lifeforms. I mean, carbon-based fleshbulbs, holes, crannies, and critters are so twentieth-century. Yawn City. I hope TF2 isn't reading this. Imagine. A whole new world (literally!) of major deviation & irresponsible sin, immorality and filth. Lovely.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Wed 21st January 2009, 2:11pm
Post #15


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



Wikipedia is the only encyclopedia on earth the needs a disambiguation page for "Nose Job."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lifebaka
post Wed 21st January 2009, 3:50pm
Post #16


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon 8th Dec 2008, 10:03pm
Member No.: 9,305

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 21st January 2009, 9:11am) *

Wikipedia is the only encyclopedia on earth the needs a disambiguation page for "Nose Job."

Just a minor point, but Nose Job is actually a redirect.

Also, three cheers for loud music, preventing me from picturing all this stuff... sick.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Wed 21st January 2009, 9:10pm
Post #17


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Wed 21st January 2009, 6:55am) *

QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 21st January 2009, 1:05pm) *
Soon we'll have covered all the fleshbulbs and the holes and crannies. And the critters.

Gotta be something new under the sun. bored.gif sleep.gif

You mean our sun? Well, Europa is showing some promise, though probably only for fans of jellyfish and squid and other yucky things. For something really new you're talking about some other sun somewhere. My current fave is Gamma Cephei. Seems like a good candidate for some (in)decent silicon-based lifeforms. I mean, carbon-based fleshbulbs, holes, crannies, and critters are so twentieth-century. Yawn City. I hope TF2 isn't reading this. Imagine. A whole new world (literally!) of major deviation & irresponsible sin, immorality and filth. Lovely.

Assume you've seen Tentacle erotica.

I ate a harmless live jellyfish not long ago, in a lake full of them. So I have known sin.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 6 13, 6:05am