List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors, ... Haiduc has competition Options

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

Elsewhere we discuss the work of Haiduc.

From another piece of his handiwork ... List of films depicting pederasty it appears Haiduc has competition from one Tony Sandel, author of List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors. One of the many contortions the authors perform to re-title the topic included JzG. Tony is also behind the very encyclopediac List of books portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors.

Sandel is the author of many of "List of ... " to do with sex abuse of children, pedophilia; songs, movies, books etc. The Wikipedia is an instant encyclopediac guidebook to anyone interested in the perversion.

Again, watch for all the topic renaming going on. Haiduc pops up as do a few other known suspects.

Its weird ... even 5 years after my first involvement with the Pee-dia, I have no idea all of this was going on and that its form was exactly the same as all the old agendas grinding away day in day out. How much time and energy has been wasted on this crap?

As far back as 2005, Mistress Selina Kyle pulled Haiduc up for being in the "Childlove movement" pointing out that sex with "boys as young as 12 which is obviously blatant pedophilia" and points out Haiduc's removal of Pedophilia from the Pederastry topic as being "irrelevant".

Nor did I ever know about Childlove movement, Pedophilia advocacy or Pro-pedophile activism being euphemistically renamed and moved to "Age of consent reform". Check history for renames.

This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy:

[Doc glasgow]

Lindsay Ashford (activist)

I'm also wondering why wikipedia still has an article on this.

I realise being a disgusting apologist for pedophiles isn't a deletion criteria, but surely being a totally unnotable disgusting apologist for pedophiles should be?

[The Joy]

Lindsay Ashford (activist)

I'm also wondering why wikipedia still has an article on this.

I realise being a disgusting apologist for pedophiles isn't a deletion criteria, but surely being a totally unnotable disgusting apologist for pedophiles should be?

The article's creator, Zanthalon (T-C-L-K-R-D) apparently was banned in 2007 for "activities damaging to Wikipedia's reputation." That should have sent alarm bells for this article and others written by him. It was also edited heavily by Jim Burton (T-C-L-K-R-D) and Tyciol (T-C-L-K-R-D) , both banned for pro-pedophile activities on Wikipedia.

Lindsay Ashford (activist)

Well, the Ashford bio was originally created by Zanthalon (T-C-L-K-R-D) .
Whose talkpage was blanked and protected by Fred Bauder, for (and I quote):

21:09, 7 March 2007 Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) m (Protected User talk:Zanthalon: Pevent recreation of user talk page damaging to Wikipedia's reputation [edit=sysop:move=sysop])

(IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)

Ah, beat me to it! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)