The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ada Lovelace, Failure of Wiki Feminism and Wikipedia in General
Ottava
post Mon 10th December 2012, 6:01pm
Post #1


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



As most of you know, I created the base of what is the Ada Lovelace page from the horrible version it was before. I did not complete it because I only did it as a side project when working on Byron. Her name has been used by the the feminist Wikipedians (some of the least competent people around, which is dreadful) to be a symbol.

Their recent improvement drive shows why it is dreadful. Superficial and almost nothing there is. Adding additional pointless trivial refs to already referenced statements. Adding trivia throughout. There is also the addition of information to cited passages without the sources (the info isn't within the page numbers, making the claim of the citation turning into a lie).

Wikipedia gets rid of experts and substitutes with political ideologues. Yay for systematic failure!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 9 17, 5:37am