|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| Malleus |
Sat 7th November 2009, 6:42am
Post
#21
|
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 1,682 Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm From: United Kingdom Member No.: 8,716 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
If he ever did this before I don't remember it. Since August he's contributed 7 featured articles and nearly 30 good articles on scholarly topics. Fantastic content writer; here's wishing he were better with people. Let's give him a little breathing room. How persistent and severe would Ottava have to be in his attacks on other editors before his conduct would be deemed intolerable? Do you think it's possible that Ottava has been doing all that constructive editing because he realizes that he'd otherwise be quickly banned? If he was restricted in some way that prevented him from trolling, he'd probably lose interest in editing altogether, which may in fact be essentially what happened this time. How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned? You're way beyond crazy everyking. |
| A Horse With No Name |
Sat 7th November 2009, 12:03pm
Post
#22
|
![]() I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 4,471 Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm Member No.: 9,985 |
If Ottava is a decent page maker he should just go to Wikipedia Review or Everything2, or something equivalent. No point in having your pages smashed by casual ip addresses, since the governors of the site have no interest in implementing better software. Or, even better, he can write for a professional media outlet. ![]() |
| Kelly Martin |
Sat 7th November 2009, 2:40pm
Post
#23
|
|
Bring back the guttersnipes! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 3,270 Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am From: EN61bw Member No.: 6,696 |
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned? I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible. |
| Viridae |
Sun 8th November 2009, 1:25am
Post
#24
|
![]() Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,319 Joined: Sat 19th May 2007, 4:16am Member No.: 1,498 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
If he ever did this before I don't remember it. Since August he's contributed 7 featured articles and nearly 30 good articles on scholarly topics. Fantastic content writer; here's wishing he were better with people. Let's give him a little breathing room. How persistent and severe would Ottava have to be in his attacks on other editors before his conduct would be deemed intolerable? Do you think it's possible that Ottava has been doing all that constructive editing because he realizes that he'd otherwise be quickly banned? If he was restricted in some way that prevented him from trolling, he'd probably lose interest in editing altogether, which may in fact be essentially what happened this time. I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing. |
| everyking |
Sun 8th November 2009, 2:12am
Post
#25
|
|
Postmaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,368 Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am Member No.: 81 |
I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing. It's more likely that the constructive editing is the side project and the trolling is the main event. After all, when confronted with the imminent likelihood of sanctions that would limit his ability to troll, he chose to leave and not write articles anymore. Doesn't that speak volumes about his priorities? Also, considering that he's a religious fanatic, I don't think playing around with a bunch of vulgar children would have much troll appeal for him. This post has been edited by everyking: Sun 8th November 2009, 2:16am |
| GlassBeadGame |
Sun 8th November 2009, 2:19am
Post
#26
|
![]() Dharma Bum ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 7,919 Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West. Member No.: 981 |
I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing. It's more likely that the constructive editing is the side project and the trolling is the main event. After all, when confronted with the imminent likelihood of sanctions that would limit his ability to troll, he chose to leave and not write articles anymore. Doesn't that speak volumes about his priorities? But Everyking, his fingers pressed keys that the magic wiki spun into gold, so you miss him sorely, right? |
| Malleus |
Sun 8th November 2009, 4:02am
Post
#27
|
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 1,682 Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm From: United Kingdom Member No.: 8,716 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned? I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.It is to me. |
| Kelly Martin |
Sun 8th November 2009, 5:02am
Post
#28
|
|
Bring back the guttersnipes! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 3,270 Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am From: EN61bw Member No.: 6,696 |
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned? I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible. |
| Malleus |
Sun 8th November 2009, 5:12am
Post
#29
|
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 1,682 Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm From: United Kingdom Member No.: 8,716 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned? I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.Perhaps. Oh, what I'd give to be omniscient like you. ![]() |
| Tower |
Sun 8th November 2009, 9:30am
Post
#30
|
![]() New Member ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 39 Joined: Sat 5th Sep 2009, 8:27pm Member No.: 13,429 |
Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm Hi Ottava. ![]() |
| A Horse With No Name |
Sun 8th November 2009, 12:23pm
Post
#31
|
![]() I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 4,471 Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm Member No.: 9,985 |
Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm Hi Ottava. ![]() Daddy's home! Daddy's home! ![]() |
| Cedric |
Sun 8th November 2009, 12:38pm
Post
#32
|
![]() General Gato ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,648 Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm From: God's Ain Country Member No.: 1,116 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm Hi Ottava. ![]() Back?? He never even left. Nothing more here than a lot of attention-whoring whining of a type we have seen hundreds of times before. Honestly, people! ![]() |
| SB_Johnny |
Sun 8th November 2009, 1:46pm
Post
#33
|
![]() It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,128 Joined: Mon 15th Sep 2008, 3:10pm Member No.: 8,272 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm Hi Ottava. ![]() I'm under the impression he's an avid WR reader... actually the wikibreak might have gone on a little longer if he was free to post here. Back?? He never even left. Nothing more here than a lot of attention-whoring whining of a type we have seen hundreds of times before. Honestly, people! ![]() Aw, c'mon now. He took over 36 hours off! ![]() |
| Casliber |
Mon 9th November 2009, 1:11am
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 425 Joined: Fri 19th Oct 2007, 10:08pm Member No.: 3,559 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
If Ottava is a decent page maker he should just go to Wikipedia Review or Everything2, or something equivalent. No point in having your pages smashed by casual ip addresses, since the governors of the site have no interest in implementing better software. Writing Featured Articles is an antidote to that, as a consensus flagged-stable-revision-thingy, and was my prime motivation for writing Featured content in the first place (as an anchor once the articles start to erode like sandcastles at the beach...) ![]() |
| everyking |
Mon 9th November 2009, 7:30am
Post
#35
|
|
Postmaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,368 Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am Member No.: 81 |
Since Ottava isn't really gone, the ArbCom should hurry up and accept the case and do something about him. Antandrus sums it up perfectly: "When not editing content, Ottava Rima is the single most disruptive, time-wasting, drama-creating, wikilawyering unsanctioned editor I have encountered in almost six years editing. Please accept this case to look closely at his conduct. There is no way to measure how much of the time of otherwise-productive Wikipedians he siphons off into his dramas."
|
| Eva Destruction |
Tue 10th November 2009, 12:33am
Post
#36
|
![]() Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,735 Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm Member No.: 3,301 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Since Ottava isn't really gone, the ArbCom should hurry up and accept the case and do something about him. Antandrus sums it up perfectly: "When not editing content, Ottava Rima is the single most disruptive, time-wasting, drama-creating, wikilawyering unsanctioned editor I have encountered in almost six years editing. Please accept this case to look closely at his conduct. There is no way to measure how much of the time of otherwise-productive Wikipedians he siphons off into his dramas." Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy". |
| everyking |
Tue 10th November 2009, 2:13am
Post
#37
|
|
Postmaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,368 Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am Member No.: 81 |
Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy". I remember admins used to say "Wiki is not therapy" when banning crazy people. |
| Malleus |
Tue 10th November 2009, 2:18am
Post
#38
|
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 1,682 Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm From: United Kingdom Member No.: 8,716 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy". I remember admins used to say "Wiki is not therapy" when banning crazy people. Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar. This post has been edited by Malleus: Tue 10th November 2009, 2:18am |
| Somey |
Tue 10th November 2009, 2:48am
Post
#39
|
![]() Can't actually moderate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar. Nobody is suggesting he be certified in any way, Mr. Malleus - only that he be removed from the stress-inducing factor. The fact is, Fowler&fowler (T-C-L-K-R-D) is right, and some of the entries on Ottava's talk page do indicate severe WP-induced mental stress, which many of us have seen before and none of us want to see again. An immediate indefinite ban would actually be the best way to help him, whereas an ArbCom case would be the best way to make his mental state even worse. None of this is meant to suggest that I've changed my mind about Ottava's behavior here on WR, which I still believe to have been an experiment in how far a person like him can go to annoy us here before getting his account suspended. Nevertheless, the mere fact that he would even do that at all should have been a strong indication to ArbCom and the admins that Ottava was, and is, a nervous breakdown waiting to happen. The further away he can get from Wikipedia, the better off he'll be. |
| Malleus |
Tue 10th November 2009, 3:09am
Post
#40
|
|
Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 1,682 Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm From: United Kingdom Member No.: 8,716 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar. Nobody is suggesting he be certified in any way, Mr. Malleus - only that he be removed from the stress-inducing factor. The fact is, Fowler&fowler (T-C-L-K-R-D) is right, and some of the entries on Ottava's talk page do indicate severe WP-induced mental stress, which many of us have seen before and none of us want to see again. An immediate indefinite ban would actually be the best way to help him, whereas an ArbCom case would be the best way to make his mental state even worse. None of this is meant to suggest that I've changed my mind about Ottava's behavior here on WR, which I still believe to have been an experiment in how far a person like him can go to annoy us here before getting his account suspended. Nevertheless, the mere fact that he would even do that at all should have been a strong indication to ArbCom and the admins that Ottava was, and is, a nervous breakdown waiting to happen. The further away he can get from Wikipedia, the better off he'll be. So you're a qualified psychiatrist too. Fair enough. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th 6 13, 4:07am |