The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

19 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ottava leaves Wikipedia
Malleus
post Sat 7th November 2009, 6:42am
Post #21


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 7th November 2009, 6:09am) *

QUOTE(Wiki Witch of the West @ Fri 6th November 2009, 10:10pm) *

If he ever did this before I don't remember it. Since August he's contributed 7 featured articles and nearly 30 good articles on scholarly topics. Fantastic content writer; here's wishing he were better with people. Let's give him a little breathing room.


How persistent and severe would Ottava have to be in his attacks on other editors before his conduct would be deemed intolerable? Do you think it's possible that Ottava has been doing all that constructive editing because he realizes that he'd otherwise be quickly banned? If he was restricted in some way that prevented him from trolling, he'd probably lose interest in editing altogether, which may in fact be essentially what happened this time.

How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned?

You're way beyond crazy everyking.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sat 7th November 2009, 12:03pm
Post #22


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(Tex @ Fri 6th November 2009, 8:19pm) *

If Ottava is a decent page maker he should just go to Wikipedia Review or Everything2, or something equivalent. No point in having your pages smashed by casual ip addresses, since the governors of the site have no interest in implementing better software.


Or, even better, he can write for a professional media outlet. ermm.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Sat 7th November 2009, 2:40pm
Post #23


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 12:42am) *
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned?
I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Viridae
post Sun 8th November 2009, 1:25am
Post #24


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,319
Joined: Sat 19th May 2007, 4:16am
Member No.: 1,498

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 7th November 2009, 5:09pm) *

QUOTE(Wiki Witch of the West @ Fri 6th November 2009, 10:10pm) *

If he ever did this before I don't remember it. Since August he's contributed 7 featured articles and nearly 30 good articles on scholarly topics. Fantastic content writer; here's wishing he were better with people. Let's give him a little breathing room.


How persistent and severe would Ottava have to be in his attacks on other editors before his conduct would be deemed intolerable? Do you think it's possible that Ottava has been doing all that constructive editing because he realizes that he'd otherwise be quickly banned? If he was restricted in some way that prevented him from trolling, he'd probably lose interest in editing altogether, which may in fact be essentially what happened this time.


I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Sun 8th November 2009, 2:12am
Post #25


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(Viridae @ Sun 8th November 2009, 2:25am) *

I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing.


It's more likely that the constructive editing is the side project and the trolling is the main event. After all, when confronted with the imminent likelihood of sanctions that would limit his ability to troll, he chose to leave and not write articles anymore. Doesn't that speak volumes about his priorities? Also, considering that he's a religious fanatic, I don't think playing around with a bunch of vulgar children would have much troll appeal for him.

This post has been edited by everyking: Sun 8th November 2009, 2:16am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Sun 8th November 2009, 2:19am
Post #26


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 7th November 2009, 9:12pm) *

QUOTE(Viridae @ Sun 8th November 2009, 2:25am) *

I think you are being way too cynical, I certainly wouldn't put the effort into contributing all that he does just so he can troll with impunity - of course, he might have realised he can be a troll as a side project in addition to the content which he seems to enjoy contributing. That said, I don't think he is particuarly trollish, just has a filthy temper and has discovered he can (up till now) make people back down by screaming harrasment. Frankly is you want to troll with impunity, either edit ED, go play on/b/ or become an admin, all of which are easier options that doing what he is doing.


It's more likely that the constructive editing is the side project and the trolling is the main event. After all, when confronted with the imminent likelihood of sanctions that would limit his ability to troll, he chose to leave and not write articles anymore. Doesn't that speak volumes about his priorities?


But Everyking, his fingers pressed keys that the magic wiki spun into gold, so you miss him sorely, right?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Sun 8th November 2009, 4:02am
Post #27


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 7th November 2009, 2:40pm) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 12:42am) *
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned?
I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.

It is to me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Sun 8th November 2009, 5:02am
Post #28


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 10:02pm) *
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 7th November 2009, 2:40pm) *
QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 12:42am) *
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned?
I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.
It is to me.
Perhaps you should change your name to Horatio, then.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Sun 8th November 2009, 5:12am
Post #29


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 8th November 2009, 5:02am) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 10:02pm) *
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 7th November 2009, 2:40pm) *
QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 7th November 2009, 12:42am) *
How "persistent and severe" do your own attacks have to be before your conduct is deemed "intolerable"? Are you seriously proposing that anyone would work on 7 featured articles and 30 GAs just to avoid being banned?
I've seen stranger behavior in the context of cults (Scientology, the Family, stuff like that). It's not incomprehensible.
It is to me.
Perhaps you should change your name to Horatio, then.

Perhaps. Oh, what I'd give to be omniscient like you. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tower
post Sun 8th November 2009, 9:30am
Post #30


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat 5th Sep 2009, 8:27pm
Member No.: 13,429



Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. rolleyes.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm

Hi Ottava. happy.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Sun 8th November 2009, 12:23pm
Post #31


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(Tower @ Sun 8th November 2009, 4:30am) *

Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. rolleyes.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm

Hi Ottava. happy.gif


Daddy's home! Daddy's home! boing.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Sun 8th November 2009, 12:38pm
Post #32


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tower @ Sun 8th November 2009, 3:30am) *

Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. rolleyes.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm

Hi Ottava. happy.gif

Back?? He never even left.

Nothing more here than a lot of attention-whoring whining of a type we have seen hundreds of times before. Honestly, people! bored.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SB_Johnny
post Sun 8th November 2009, 1:46pm
Post #33


It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined: Mon 15th Sep 2008, 3:10pm
Member No.: 8,272

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tower @ Sun 8th November 2009, 3:30am) *

Anyway to come back to topic, I see Ottava is back on WP now. Posting on Malleus's talk page. Even talking about us over here. rolleyes.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum#Hmm

Hi Ottava. happy.gif

I'm under the impression he's an avid WR reader... actually the wikibreak might have gone on a little longer if he was free to post here.
QUOTE(Cedric @ Sun 8th November 2009, 7:38am) *

Back?? He never even left.

Nothing more here than a lot of attention-whoring whining of a type we have seen hundreds of times before. Honestly, people! bored.gif

Aw, c'mon now. He took over 36 hours off! rolleyes.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Casliber
post Mon 9th November 2009, 1:11am
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 425
Joined: Fri 19th Oct 2007, 10:08pm
Member No.: 3,559

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tex @ Sat 7th November 2009, 12:19pm) *

If Ottava is a decent page maker he should just go to Wikipedia Review or Everything2, or something equivalent. No point in having your pages smashed by casual ip addresses, since the governors of the site have no interest in implementing better software.


Writing Featured Articles is an antidote to that, as a consensus flagged-stable-revision-thingy, and was my prime motivation for writing Featured content in the first place (as an anchor once the articles start to erode like sandcastles at the beach...) biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Mon 9th November 2009, 7:30am
Post #35


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



Since Ottava isn't really gone, the ArbCom should hurry up and accept the case and do something about him. Antandrus sums it up perfectly: "When not editing content, Ottava Rima is the single most disruptive, time-wasting, drama-creating, wikilawyering unsanctioned editor I have encountered in almost six years editing. Please accept this case to look closely at his conduct. There is no way to measure how much of the time of otherwise-productive Wikipedians he siphons off into his dramas."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Tue 10th November 2009, 12:33am
Post #36


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Mon 9th November 2009, 7:30am) *

Since Ottava isn't really gone, the ArbCom should hurry up and accept the case and do something about him. Antandrus sums it up perfectly: "When not editing content, Ottava Rima is the single most disruptive, time-wasting, drama-creating, wikilawyering unsanctioned editor I have encountered in almost six years editing. Please accept this case to look closely at his conduct. There is no way to measure how much of the time of otherwise-productive Wikipedians he siphons off into his dramas."




Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Tue 10th November 2009, 2:13am
Post #37


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 10th November 2009, 1:33am) *

Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy".


I remember admins used to say "Wiki is not therapy" when banning crazy people.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Tue 10th November 2009, 2:18am
Post #38


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 10th November 2009, 2:13am) *

QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Tue 10th November 2009, 1:33am) *

Case now open. An absolute humdinger of a piece of craziness, even by Wikipedia standards as the first post, too: "Please can Arbcom reject this case, because I think Ottava's crazy".


I remember admins used to say "Wiki is not therapy" when banning crazy people.

Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar.

This post has been edited by Malleus: Tue 10th November 2009, 2:18am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Tue 10th November 2009, 2:48am
Post #39


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 9th November 2009, 8:18pm) *
Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar.

Nobody is suggesting he be certified in any way, Mr. Malleus - only that he be removed from the stress-inducing factor. The fact is, Fowler&fowler (T-C-L-K-R-D) is right, and some of the entries on Ottava's talk page do indicate severe WP-induced mental stress, which many of us have seen before and none of us want to see again. An immediate indefinite ban would actually be the best way to help him, whereas an ArbCom case would be the best way to make his mental state even worse.

None of this is meant to suggest that I've changed my mind about Ottava's behavior here on WR, which I still believe to have been an experiment in how far a person like him can go to annoy us here before getting his account suspended. Nevertheless, the mere fact that he would even do that at all should have been a strong indication to ArbCom and the admins that Ottava was, and is, a nervous breakdown waiting to happen. The further away he can get from Wikipedia, the better off he'll be.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Tue 10th November 2009, 3:09am
Post #40


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 10th November 2009, 2:48am) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 9th November 2009, 8:18pm) *
Most people are certified "crazy" by a qualified psychiatrist though, not some wikipedian on a mission to improve the world's grammar.

Nobody is suggesting he be certified in any way, Mr. Malleus - only that he be removed from the stress-inducing factor. The fact is, Fowler&fowler (T-C-L-K-R-D) is right, and some of the entries on Ottava's talk page do indicate severe WP-induced mental stress, which many of us have seen before and none of us want to see again. An immediate indefinite ban would actually be the best way to help him, whereas an ArbCom case would be the best way to make his mental state even worse.

None of this is meant to suggest that I've changed my mind about Ottava's behavior here on WR, which I still believe to have been an experiment in how far a person like him can go to annoy us here before getting his account suspended. Nevertheless, the mere fact that he would even do that at all should have been a strong indication to ArbCom and the admins that Ottava was, and is, a nervous breakdown waiting to happen. The further away he can get from Wikipedia, the better off he'll be.

So you're a qualified psychiatrist too. Fair enough.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

19 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 4:07am