I don't really think one should have to have a degree, experience, or both. If one claims a degree or expertise, many people will trust them more if they edit articles in their field than someone who doesn't claim those things or someone who claims not to have them. I myself don't trust experts more (except for certain things), but since many others do, a user who claims a degree or expertise should state things that would prove it, such as a reference to their published, peer-reviewed report and/or a link to it on the web. The reference should be in the format Firstname Lastname, Publication (Year). lso, college records would be useful for their user page, if they saythey are an expert or a graduate and edit articles in their field. I don't think we should care that the Wikipedian in question is a Wobbly and in my opinion, it is not useful information. I think FLIPSIDE knows what I'm talking about.
Edit: One, who are you talking to/about? Edit2: Lar, I don't care whether it's self-published or not, it needs to be peer reviewed. Not necessarily by experts, because other people's points of view should be included in the Review too.
This post has been edited by bluevictim:
|