 Slim's new article on Brandt |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
| gomi |
 Thu 14th June 2007, 9:52pm
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 3,022 Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm Member No.: 565  |
SlimVirgin's new article-in-preparation for Mr. Brandt can be found here (at least until she deletes it). |
   |
 
|
| Jonny Cache |
Thu 14th June 2007, 10:00pm
Post
#2
|
 τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 14th June 2007, 5:52pm)  SlimVirgin's new article-in-preparation for Mr. Brandt can be found here (at least until she deletes it). It's so typically <fauxwiki>"collaborative"</fauxwiki> of SlimVirgin to develop an article or policy in closet and then spring it on everybody as a fait accompli. Jonny  This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 15th June 2007, 7:47pm |
|
|
|
| Herschelkrustofsky |
Thu 14th June 2007, 11:13pm
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 5,199 Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm From: Kalifornia Member No.: 130 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 14th June 2007, 2:52pm) SlimVirgin's new article-in-preparation for Mr. Brandt can be found here (at least until she deletes it). Oops. |
|
|
|
| Rootology |
Thu 14th June 2007, 11:54pm
Post
#4
|
 Fat Cat Group: Regulars Posts: 1,489 Joined: Fri 26th Jan 2007, 11:11pm Member No.: 877 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...it=500&offset=0
I notice that she keeps doing something with this file as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ASlimVirgin%2FL Are admins allowed to use their tools to hide content from non-admins thus? What is the policy on that? Another, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...it=500&offset=0 * 20:59, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 20:53, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (48 revisions restored) * 18:21, 14 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 18:09, 14 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (44 revisions restored) * 14:00, 14 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 13:48, 14 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (41 revisions restored) * 08:55, 28 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (not needed) * 08:48, 28 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (40 revisions restored) * 01:46, 24 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (content before blanking was: 'What is the purpose of this page?') * 03:20, 3 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 02:58, 3 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (35 revisions restored) * 06:09, 2 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (delete until needed) * 05:38, 2 December 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (29 revisions restored) * 08:17, 20 September 2006 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (not needed) What is that? She's clearly adding content and maintaining something, there. This stinks as "not right" under policy. Perhaps one of the friendly admins reading here could review that and post the contents? I note also that deleted items and moves stay in logs forever. A creative vandal, if he were to chain move a page, could have fun leaving a permanent record on someone with it. This post has been edited by Rootology: Thu 14th June 2007, 11:54pm |
|
|
|
| Daniel Brandt |
Fri 15th June 2007, 3:45am
Post
#5
|
|
Postmaster Group: Regulars Posts: 2,472 Joined: Fri 24th Mar 2006, 12:23am Member No.: 77 |
Slim is playing with proposed content on her user space, and after she makes a modification, she deletes it because it's none of your business, apparently. Then the next time she wants to make a modification to the same article, she restores it, makes the modification, and deletes.
In the case of the PIR article, she and I exchanged a couple of emails because she asked me what I thought about her proposed PIR page. After I responded and she knew I had seen it, she deleted it because it's none of your business, apparently. With me she's doing this in good faith, at least today. Out of respect for that, I won't get more specific. It's no big deal. JoshuaZ also sent me an email today asking what I thought of the closure. Naturally I declined to respond to him because it would only be used against me. |
|
|
|
| Somey |
Fri 15th June 2007, 4:32am
Post
#6
|
 Can't actually moderate Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
QUOTE(Rootology @ Thu 14th June 2007, 6:54pm) I notice that she keeps doing something with this file as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ASlimVirgin%2FL That's the LaRouche file. Full of IP addresses of people who have tried to add positive content to Larouche articles. QUOTE Another, here: * 20:59, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 20:53, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (48 revisions restored)... Gnetwerker... QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Thu 14th June 2007, 10:45pm) It's no big deal. JoshuaZ also sent me an email today asking what I thought of the closure. Naturally I declined to respond to him... Not much point in responding anyway - e-mails like that usually just get routed through the "RejectHumanGeneratedReply()" subroutine. |
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Fri 15th June 2007, 4:38am
Post
#7
|
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(Somey @ Fri 15th June 2007, 12:32am) QUOTE(Rootology @ Thu 14th June 2007, 6:54pm) I notice that she keeps doing something with this file as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ASlimVirgin%2FL That's the LaRouche file. Full of IP addresses of people who have tried to add positive content to Larouche articles. QUOTE Another, here: * 20:59, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 20:53, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (48 revisions restored)... Gnetwerker... Can you believe it ? — I've heard of people who'd call that STALKING ? No1 we know, of course ... Jonny |
|
|
|
| gomi |
Fri 15th June 2007, 6:19am
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 3,022 Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm Member No.: 565 |
QUOTE(Rootology @ Thu 14th June 2007, 4:54pm) Another, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...it=500&offset=0 * 20:59, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" * 20:53, 15 March 2007 SlimVirgin (Talk | contribs) restored "User:SlimVirgin/GNT" (48 revisions restored) ... What is that? She's clearly adding content and maintaining something, there. |
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Fri 15th June 2007, 12:56pm
Post
#9
|
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Re: Gnetwerker
This bit of Bizarro World DoubleThink from the ANal Aggression Files. NE1 who is fooled by SlumVirgin's performance of Madame Nitouche on the WikiEnList and elsewhere should read this at least three times, and call a doctor in the morning. Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 15th June 2007, 1:00pm |
|
|
|
| BobbyBombastic |
 Fri 15th June 2007, 5:48pm
Post
#10
|
 gabba gabba hey Group: Regulars Posts: 1,071 Joined: Mon 2nd Apr 2007, 6:27pm From: BADCITY, Iowa Member No.: 1,223 |
QUOTE(Rootology @ Thu 14th June 2007, 11:54pm) What is that? She's clearly adding content and maintaining something, there. This stinks as "not right" under policy. Perhaps one of the friendly admins reading here could review that and post the contents? It certainly looks to me like an abuse of the tools and counter to the idea that admins are just regular users with a few more buttons. I wonder if Slim is the pioneer of this abuse or how often this occurs. I do hope an admin with integrity may be able to enlighten us a little. |
|
|
|
| LamontStormstar |
Fri 15th June 2007, 6:14pm
Post
#11
|
 Postmaster Group: Regulars Posts: 2,359 Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am Member No.: 342 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Why doesn't she just keep it all in preview and a text file?
|
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Fri 15th June 2007, 6:32pm
Post
#12
|
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(BobbyBombastic @ Fri 15th June 2007, 1:48pm) QUOTE(Rootology @ Thu 14th June 2007, 11:54pm) What is that? She's clearly adding content and maintaining something, there. This stinks as "not right" under policy. Perhaps one of the friendly admins reading here could review that and post the contents? It certainly looks to me like an abuse of the tools and counter to the idea that admins are just regular users with a few more buttons. I wonder if Slim is the pioneer of this abuse or how often this occurs. I do hope an admin with integrity may be able to enlighten us a little. Let's not be naive. SlimVirgin will continue to do whatever the devil she wants. The mythological creature Wikipedia Admin With Integrity (WAWI) may, like the Unicorn, exist in some fictional universe or other, but it's the Unicorn, not the Virgin that's trapped in the bower here. What we can do is describe her actions. SlimVirgin is using Wikipedia resources to carry out a highly aggressive programme of Original Research into the identities and the editing patterns of people who came to Wikipedia as editors. Of course she knows that this activity violates an entire host of espoused principles that Wikipediots praise loudly and supposedly hold dear — that's why she has to do it outside the pale of Wikipedia's highly vaunted pretense of openness and transparency. Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 15th June 2007, 6:40pm |
|
|
|
| BobbyBombastic |
Fri 15th June 2007, 10:55pm
Post
#13
|
|
gabba gabba hey Group: Regulars Posts: 1,071 Joined: Mon 2nd Apr 2007, 6:27pm From: BADCITY, Iowa Member No.: 1,223 |
I'm not sure what's naive about it. There must be a wide-eyed 15 year old admin somewhere on WP that is willing to take on SlimVirgin. Rootology explains the "new admins" vs Sidaway's "core community" well all over this thread.
This post has been edited by BobbyBombastic: Fri 15th June 2007, 10:56pm |
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Sat 16th June 2007, 3:33am
Post
#14
|
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(BobbyBombastic @ Fri 15th June 2007, 6:55pm) I'm not sure what's naive about it. There must be a wide-eyed 15 year old admin somewhere on WP that is willing to take on SlimVirgin. Rootology explains the "new admins" vs Sidaway's "core community" well all over this thread. Yeah, naive enough to go up against SlamVorgon with the wikipeashooter of GFDL ... Well, we already know what GFDL means to Wikipediots — QUOTE «¤«¤« GFDL »¤»¤»  Get F*ck*d, Dumb Loser Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Sat 16th June 2007, 4:14am |
|
|
|
| BobbyBombastic |
Sat 16th June 2007, 4:28am
Post
#15
|
|
gabba gabba hey Group: Regulars Posts: 1,071 Joined: Mon 2nd Apr 2007, 6:27pm From: BADCITY, Iowa Member No.: 1,223 |
I hope your not misunderstanding me by thinking that I give a shit what happens to SV or WP, I've essentially committed myself to be being an outsider. I'm certainly not going up against anyone, not because I have something better to do, but because I don't buy into WP's stated altruistic intentions. You know and I know that there are a lot of people that do buy into it and may choose to slay the mighty beast.
 |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th 5 13, 3:46am |