FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Wikipedia opening a Teahouse? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Wikipedia opening a Teahouse?, Not to be confused with Teahot
melloden
post
Post #1


.
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482



I noticed this developing "Teahouse" project today. It seems to be yet another one of their make-new-editors-fit-in initiatives, and given that it's being organized by "community fellows" I would assume that the WMF is paying for this.

QUOTE
The Teahouse is a populated, user-friendly welcome center/help space that organizes experienced editors to actively reach out to new users in a many-to-many setting and provides on-wiki encouragement and peer support to promising new editors to promote increased engagement and retention.


Here's the problem I see with them wasting time and money on things like this, which are destined to end up as useless like every previous program with the same goal (Wiki Guides? Mood Bar? Wiki Love?): Wikipediots don't want to be "user-friendly" and "reach out." They're usually nerds, antisocial Internet addicts, or awkward social outcasts who don't understand the concepts of "encouragement" or "peer support."

Why does the WMF not realize this? Or does this Teahouse idea actually have a chance or succeeding? I doubt it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Cino
post
Post #2


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 6
Joined:
Member No.: 75,073



It looks like a way for more people to understand editing policies, so it would seem a good use of a bit of money, particularly with worries about the quality of biographies. Presumably it's not going to cost much or possibly nothing. Does any one know how much?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Cino @ Mon 30th January 2012, 10:14am) *

It looks like a way for more people to understand editing policies, so it would seem a good use of a bit of money, particularly with worries about the quality of biographies. Presumably it's not going to cost much or possibly nothing. Does any one know how much?


The "cost" will get sunk into the salaries of the one or two or three Wikimedia Foundation staff members who will spend their time working on this very, very important initiative. The fact that Carrite was deemed to have a "special 'knack' for working with new users" shows you that only the top-most intelligent and savvy of WMF employees are being assigned to this very, very important initiative. So, we might estimate that their salaries are in the $70K to $80K range.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)