|
Help
This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
Herostratus LIVES!, (you won't believe this) |
|
|
EricBarbour |
|
blah
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
|
Despite being banned from Wikipedia (and computers generally) by court order, notorious pedophilia editor Herostratus (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is still able to edit WP. How? By getting his court-appointed minder to edit for him, apparently. Check his edit log for proof. He's doing it, even while being banned from watching TV or listening to the radio. Mentioned here. Why is his account still active?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
Peter Damian |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212
|
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 11:47am) QUOTE(The Joy @ Sun 28th February 2010, 3:28am) The sad thing is that the ultra-libertarian people on Wikipedia see no problem with pedophile editors as long as they are building the encyclopedia. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) The only problem I have with paedos is when they are molesting kids. I don't have any problem with them when they are editing WP. The only reason pedos edit Wikipedia is to justify and normalise their view of themselves. They are incredibly persistent and tenacious and have a store of arguments that they will edit into any pedophilia-related subject. That pedophilia means simply liking children, not wanting to have sex with them. That violence committed by pedophiles is no different from violence committed in adult heterosexual relationships. That different cultures (ancient Greek, and Islam supposedly) have had a tolerant and benign attitude to pedophilia. That pedophilia is bad, but 'pederasty' is perfectly OK. Anyone who tries to put in material that casts any negative light upon their practice, such as th idea http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=215154288 that "the production, possession, and distribution of child pornography are deeply interwoven in the activities of pedophiles, pederasts, and those involved in rings, sexual trafficking, child prostitution, and, more recently, the Internet" is instantly reverted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=215206918 ("Inappropriate material removed to 'child abuse' page"). They combine and plot with others to get action from administrators http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=222250643 (now oversighted). This procures the removal of anyone who opposes their perverted and abnormal views http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...=User%3APhdarts . Or block anyone who complains about it ("harassment").
|
|
|
|
Web Fred |
|
Pervert & Swinger
Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141
|
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 28th February 2010, 1:29pm) QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 11:47am) QUOTE(The Joy @ Sun 28th February 2010, 3:28am) The sad thing is that the ultra-libertarian people on Wikipedia see no problem with pedophile editors as long as they are building the encyclopedia. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) The only problem I have with paedos is when they are molesting kids. I don't have any problem with them when they are editing WP. The only reason pedos edit Wikipedia is to justify and normalise their view of themselves. They are incredibly persistent and tenacious and have a store of arguments that they will edit into any pedophilia-related subject. That pedophilia means simply liking children, not wanting to have sex with them. That violence committed by pedophiles is no different from violence committed in adult heterosexual relationships. That different cultures (ancient Greek, and Islam supposedly) have had a tolerant and benign attitude to pedophilia. That pedophilia is bad, but 'pederasty' is perfectly OK. Anyone who tries to put in material that casts any negative light upon their practice, such as th idea http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=215154288 that "the production, possession, and distribution of child pornography are deeply interwoven in the activities of pedophiles, pederasts, and those involved in rings, sexual trafficking, child prostitution, and, more recently, the Internet" is instantly reverted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=215206918 ("Inappropriate material removed to 'child abuse' page"). They combine and plot with others to get action from administrators http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=222250643 (now oversighted). This procures the removal of anyone who opposes their perverted and abnormal views http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...=User%3APhdarts . Or block anyone who complains about it ("harassment"). I like kids, I don't want to have sex with them (or anyone under 35 for that matter) does that make me a paedophile? You give the kiddy-fiddling brigade too much credence, and Joe Public too little. They can make their little proclivities sound as positive as they like it's never going to become mainstream, it's never going to be accepted by the world at large. There is no danger whatsoever of their POV ever becoming accepted, and if you ask me, if they're busy typing then they aren't busy fiddling. By all means bring in the NPOV squad when they try to twist things to their own advantage, but why worry if he/she is a pervert if he/she is editing a 'normal' article. I still think that all this wailing and moaning and gnashing of teeth every time the "p" word is mentioned is overkill and will ultimately have more of a detrimental effect on society than the kiddy-fiddlers themselves. Meanwhile, back on the farm, the erstwhile regulars of WR go into paroxysms of outrage every time someone edits a paedophile-related article and then accuses them of being at the very least a latent paedo or even a supporter. These threads are absolutely drenched in lynch-mob adrenalin, moral indignation and holier than thou attitudes. It seems that these days over the top paedo outrage is as fashionable as lipstick lesbianism.
|
|
|
|
Peter Damian |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212
|
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 7:34pm)
I like kids, I don't want to have sex with them (or anyone under 35 for that matter) does that make me a paedophile?
You give the kiddy-fiddling brigade too much credence, and Joe Public too little. They can make their little proclivities sound as positive as they like it's never going to become mainstream, it's never going to be accepted by the world at large. There is no danger whatsoever of their POV ever becoming accepted, and if you ask me, if they're busy typing then they aren't busy fiddling.
[...] I still think that all this wailing and moaning and gnashing of teeth every time the "p" word is mentioned is overkill and will ultimately have more of a detrimental effect on society than the kiddy-fiddlers themselves.
Meanwhile, back on the farm, the erstwhile regulars of WR go into paroxysms of outrage every time someone edits a paedophile-related article and then accuses them of being at the very least a latent paedo or even a supporter. These threads are absolutely drenched in lynch-mob adrenalin, moral indignation and holier than thou attitudes.
It seems that these days over the top paedo outrage is as fashionable as lipstick lesbianism.
"The reason I spend so much time at Wikipedia is that their Paedophilia article is the top result for that term on Google, making it an important platform for us." (quoted from a pedo message board). QUOTE By all means bring in the NPOV squad when they try to twist things to their own advantage, but why worry if he/she is a pervert if he/she is editing a 'normal' article.
I have already said that it works the other way round. Those who try and impose neutrality are quickly hounded and blocked. Unfortunately this has now been oversighted. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=222250643But I can tell you what it says. It is a discussion where two SPA's are discussing how to prevent an 'attack' on one of their favourite articles. One says "I think that matters have gone beyond personal intervention - however well-authenticated - and now demand third-party intervention (as before). " An indef block of the anti-SPA followed within hours. This post has been edited by Peter Damian:
|
|
|
|
Web Fred |
|
Pervert & Swinger
Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141
|
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 28th February 2010, 7:41pm) QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 7:34pm)
I like kids, I don't want to have sex with them (or anyone under 35 for that matter) does that make me a paedophile?
You give the kiddy-fiddling brigade too much credence, and Joe Public too little. They can make their little proclivities sound as positive as they like it's never going to become mainstream, it's never going to be accepted by the world at large. There is no danger whatsoever of their POV ever becoming accepted, and if you ask me, if they're busy typing then they aren't busy fiddling.
[...] I still think that all this wailing and moaning and gnashing of teeth every time the "p" word is mentioned is overkill and will ultimately have more of a detrimental effect on society than the kiddy-fiddlers themselves.
Meanwhile, back on the farm, the erstwhile regulars of WR go into paroxysms of outrage every time someone edits a paedophile-related article and then accuses them of being at the very least a latent paedo or even a supporter. These threads are absolutely drenched in lynch-mob adrenalin, moral indignation and holier than thou attitudes.
It seems that these days over the top paedo outrage is as fashionable as lipstick lesbianism.
"The reason I spend so much time at Wikipedia is that their Paedophilia article is the top result for that term on Google, making it an important platform for us." (quoted from a pedo message board). "Platform"? So what? They are the most hated sub-species of human on the planet. What do they need a platform for? And even if they do get one who the fuck is going to vote for them? Frankly I'd far prefer they out themselves attempting to gain a "platform". I'm all for people knowing who their local paedo is, what I'm against are the low-brow, mouth-breathing fuckwits camping outside their doors with banners and broken bottles. If there's a paedo living in a house on my street and I know he's there, then that works for me. I want to know where the fuckers are, not frighten them underground where they'll get up to god knows what. QUOTE QUOTE By all means bring in the NPOV squad when they try to twist things to their own advantage, but why worry if he/she is a pervert if he/she is editing a 'normal' article.
I have already said that it works the other way round. Those who try and impose neutrality are quickly hounded and blocked. Unfortunately this has now been oversighted. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=222250643But I can tell you what it says. It is a discussion where two SPA's are discussing how to prevent an 'attack' on one of their favourite articles. One says "I think that matters have gone beyond personal intervention - however well-authenticated - and now demand third-party intervention (as before). " An indef block of the anti-SPA followed within hours. I can't say I disagree, but that's just as likely to apply to, say, a Croatian as it is to a paedophile POV pusher. I still think that it tickles me how upset people get when an paedo-related article is tweaked with a POV slant. What the hell difference is it going to make? It's their balls and brains that make them do what they do, not badly written prose in a dying online encyclopaedia.
|
|
|
|
Peter Damian |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212
|
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 8:15pm) I still think that it tickles me how upset people get when an paedo-related article is tweaked with a POV slant. What the hell difference is it going to make? It's their balls and brains that make them do what they do, not badly written prose in a dying online encyclopaedia.
Your argument depends on the assumption that no one is, or can be, persuaded by their arguments on this global platform. My children occasionally repeat very strange things that they have 'learned' from Wikipedia. If children believe the arguments that pedophiles are not inherently dangerous or abusive to children, that 'pedophilia' simply means liking children, not wanting to have sex with them, and so on, is that not going to make a difference, according to you? What if the children believe this? What if it leads to an online relationship, and more? Let's not forget 'Anothersolipsist' who was carefully grooming a young editor for RfA until he was blocked. This post has been edited by Peter Damian:
|
|
|
|
Web Fred |
|
Pervert & Swinger
Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141
|
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 28th February 2010, 8:44pm) QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 8:15pm) I still think that it tickles me how upset people get when an paedo-related article is tweaked with a POV slant. What the hell difference is it going to make? It's their balls and brains that make them do what they do, not badly written prose in a dying online encyclopaedia.
Your argument depends on the assumption that no one is, or can be, persuaded by their arguments on this global platform. My children occasionally repeat very strange things that they have 'learned' from Wikipedia. If children believe the arguments that pedophiles are not inherently dangerous or abusive to children, that 'pedophilia' simply means liking children, not wanting to have sex with them, and so on, is that not going to make a difference, according to you? What if the children believe this? What if it leads to an online relationship, and more? Let's not forget 'Anothersolipsist' who was carefully grooming a young editor for RfA until he was blocked. Actually no, I don't think it will persuade kids that the guy who wants to get his hands down their undies is only wanting to do a good thing. I think it's a fallacy for two reasons. The first being that any kid old enough to maintain a 'life' on Wikipedia is old enough to know better and you don't give them the 'hutzpah' to realise that. The second being that the average age of the kids on WP is much higher than the range that most paedos enjoy. I could understand, and agree much more, if this were MSN, Facebook et al where there are far easier, and far younger, pickings available. But Wikipedia? Nah! Given the total lack of street cred WP brings, the majority of the youngster element are brainiacs, and I really don't believe that they are so easily led. This post has been edited by Cunningly Linguistic:
|
|
|
|
NotARepublican55 |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 242
Joined:
Member No.: 15,925
|
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 3:33pm) QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 28th February 2010, 8:44pm) QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 28th February 2010, 8:15pm) I still think that it tickles me how upset people get when an paedo-related article is tweaked with a POV slant. What the hell difference is it going to make? It's their balls and brains that make them do what they do, not badly written prose in a dying online encyclopaedia.
Your argument depends on the assumption that no one is, or can be, persuaded by their arguments on this global platform. My children occasionally repeat very strange things that they have 'learned' from Wikipedia. If children believe the arguments that pedophiles are not inherently dangerous or abusive to children, that 'pedophilia' simply means liking children, not wanting to have sex with them, and so on, is that not going to make a difference, according to you? What if the children believe this? What if it leads to an online relationship, and more? Let's not forget 'Anothersolipsist' who was carefully grooming a young editor for RfA until he was blocked. Actually no, I don't think it will persuade kids that the guy who wants to get his hands down their undies is only wanting to do a good thing. I think it's a fallacy for two reasons. The first being that any kid old enough to maintain a 'life' on Wikipedia is old enough to know better and you don't give them the 'hutzpah' to realise that. The second being that the average age of the kids on WP is much higher than the range that most paedos enjoy. I could understand, and agree much more, if this were MSN, Facebook et al where there are far easier, and far younger, pickings available. But Wikipedia? Nah! Given the total lack of street cred WP brings, the majority of the youngster element are brainiacs, and I really don't believe that they are so easily led. "Smart" is not the same as possessing good judgment - in fact (at least in the case of 13 year old WikiGeeks) they're usually inversely proportional. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) This post has been edited by NotARepublican55:
|
|
|
|
Web Fred |
|
Pervert & Swinger
Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141
|
QUOTE(NotARepublican55 @ Mon 1st March 2010, 6:59am) "Smart" is not the same as possessing good judgment - in fact (at least in the case of 13 year old WikiGeeks) they're usually inversely proportional. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) Actually "smart" is the same as possessing good judgement, perhaps you're confusing it with "intelligent"?
|
|
|
|
NotARepublican55 |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 242
Joined:
Member No.: 15,925
|
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Mon 1st March 2010, 12:49pm) QUOTE(NotARepublican55 @ Mon 1st March 2010, 6:59am) "Smart" is not the same as possessing good judgment - in fact (at least in the case of 13 year old WikiGeeks) they're usually inversely proportional. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif) Actually "smart" is the same as possessing good judgement, perhaps you're confusing it with "intelligent"? Most Wikipedians aren't that "smart" then, fair enough.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
EricBarbour Herostratus LIVES! everyking While most people favor an absolute interpretation... Apathetic
While most people favor an absolute interpretatio... Eva Destruction
While most people favor an absolute interpretatio... everyking
While most people favor an absolute interpretati... Apathetic
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='223177' date=... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='223177' date=... CharlotteWebb
As he seems to acknowledge sharing his password, ... Viridae Can someone please link someone background about t... EricBarbour Can someone please link someone background about t... CharlotteWebb
Can someone please link someone background about ... Viridae
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='223177' date... Tarc
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='223187' date='W... Malleus
Well, he just unblocked himself, so that didn... Viridae
Can someone please link someone background about... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='223190' date='W... Malleus
Because WP, a project that encourages child and a... everyking
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='223190' date='W... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='223190' date='... EricBarbour I can't see the basis for blocking someone for... NotARepublican55
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='223190' date='... The Joy
[quote name='CharlotteWebb' post='223190' date='... A Horse With No Name
For goodness sakes, ArbCom, ban Herostratus now ... Malleus
Yes, where is Arbcom on this? :huh:
Hiding? CharlotteWebb
For goodness sakes, ArbCom, ban Herostratus now a... MZMcBride
So about the fucking arbcom (well, they were here... Malleus
So about the fucking arbcom (well, they were her... CharlotteWebb
Oh I think it's consistent enough all right. ... A Horse With No Name Now at ANI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia... Mike R
Now at ANI: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wik... EricBarbour Would anyone care to explain the following away?
... One
Around that time, [url=http://www.wickedlocal.com... NotARepublican55 Update: Herostratus says it "was all just a j... Viridae
Would anyone care to explain the following away?
... IN278S
He was editing right through the period he was su... jd turk I had something typed up about admins pulling stup... EricBarbour If Hero is simply a joker/smartass, (and he appear... Viridae I had a flick through his contribs. Like Haiduc, m... One
I had a flick through his contribs. Like Haiduc, ... Eva Destruction
[quote name='Viridae' post='223243' date='Wed 24t... One
[quote name='Viridae' post='223243' date='Wed 24... NotARepublican55
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='223605' date=... Eva Destruction
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='223605' date=... MZMcBride
[quote name='Viridae' post='223243' date='Wed 24... One
Despite being banned from Wikipedia (and computer... Apathetic
Have you heard of jokes? When someone claims, for... NotARepublican55
Despite being banned from Wikipedia (and compute... GlassBeadGame
Despite being banned from Wikipedia (and compute... Viridae
I had a flick through his contribs. Like Haiduc,... One
[quote name='One' post='223256' date='Wed 24th Fe... thekohser
Show me some of these diffs.
Show me some of th... One
[quote name='One' post='223258' date='Wed 24th Fe... Apathetic
Anyhow, I'm not asking Viridae for anything ... EricBarbour
Typical.
Don't be surprised if someone quie... One Oh, ok. In that case, I'm just curious about t... Apathetic
Oh, ok. In that case, I'm just curious about ... MZMcBride
Perhaps he would be better received on a website ... NotARepublican55
Oh, ok. In that case, I'm just curious about ... A Horse With No Name
Look, I'm not the brightest guy
:grin: Cunningly Linguistic Gotta love that traditional American lynch-mob men... GlassBeadGame
Gotta love that traditional American lynch-mob me... Milton Roe
Gotta love that traditional American lynch-mob me... Eva Destruction ...is that you again? :/
No, that's WebHamst... NotARepublican55
...is that you again? :/No, that's WebHamste... Malleus
No, that's [wpuser]WebHamster, who in my expe... NotARepublican55
[quote name='NotARepublican55' post='223667' date... Milton Roe No, that's [wpuser]WebHamster, who in my exper... tarantino
Ah. Well, a new Britishism-using member with a bo... One As I read everyking, their arguments are almost eq... Somey As I read everyking, their arguments are almost eq... everyking
As I read everyking, their arguments are almost e... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='One' post='223788' date='Sat 27th Fe... Cunningly Linguistic
[quote name='One' post='223788' date='Sat 27th F... The Joy
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='223830' date='S... Somey The big problem with Wikipedia is when is it fairl... Cunningly Linguistic
The sad thing is that the ultra-libertarian peopl... taiwopanfob The only problem I have with paedos is when they a... GlassBeadGame [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='223830' date='Su... MZMcBride
You know this guy said he was under criminal sanc... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='223875' date='S... EricBarbour You want to see a genuine child-molester who edite... The Joy
You want to see a genuine child-molester who edit... everyking
You want to see a genuine child-molester who edi... The Joy
[quote name='The Joy' post='223835' date='Sun 28t... NotARepublican55
[quote name='The Joy' post='223835' date='Sun 28t... everyking
And according to you, you don't believe they ... NotARepublican55
And according to you, you don't believe they... Apathetic
Have a look at [wpuser]Marlais.
Strangely enoug... CharlotteWebb
[quote name='EricBarbour' post='223828' date='Sat... Apathetic
Students will note that John V. had "oversig... jayvdb
[quote name='EricBarbour' post='223828' date='Sa... One Your post on there/their did make me laugh, MZM. E... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='Peter Damian' post='223971' date='Su... Cunningly Linguistic
BTW comments like " get his hands down their... EricBarbour [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='223975' date='Su... Somey ...But Wikipedia? Nah! Given the total lack of... Mike H
Probably a reference to Anthony Stancl, who pose... EricBarbour Probably a reference to Anthony Stancl, who posed ... GlassBeadGame
Probably a reference to Anthony Stancl, who posed... Eva Destruction The Irregular Verbs of Wikipedia:
[url=http://en.w... GlassBeadGame
The Irregular Verbs of Wikipedia:[list][url=http:... Eva Destruction
[quote name='Eva Destruction' post='224410' date=... Malleus
This exchange plumbs a depressingly familiar dept... TungstenCarbide What does "civility" mean, for instance... One
[quote name='Mike R' post='224485' date='Wed 3rd ... EricBarbour The Irregular Verbs of Wikipedia:Herostratus [i](v... Jon Awbrey
Incidentally, does anyone outside of Wikipedia ev... Mike R
Incidentally, does anyone outside of Wikipedia ev... The Joy Herostratus is open to recall. I wonder if he... GlassBeadGame
Herostratus is open to recall. I wonder if he... Jon Awbrey
What the fuck are you people waiting for?
http:... Eva Destruction
Herostratus is open to recall. I wonder if he... Zoloft
[quote name='The Joy' post='224431' date='Wed 3rd... MZMcBride It seems the Arbitration Committee has mixed up ... MZMcBride From this post by One:
Let's take a look at t... MZMcBride
Regarding self-unblocks, no, they're not actu... Alison
Regarding self-unblocks, no, they're not act... One
(4) Without talk page explanation. And this is wh... MZMcBride
[quote name='MZMcBride' post='224694' date='Fri 5... One
I'm with Risker that it doesn't make much... Malleus I agree with you that this could have been treated... MZMcBride
The findings were predictable, but what really st... Malleus
[quote name='Malleus' post='224789' date='Fri 5th... Viridae Tax evasion is still tax evasion. It is still a cr... everyking
Tax evasion is still tax evasion. It is still a c... NotARepublican55
[quote name='Viridae' post='224713' date='Fri 5th... One
If the user had made pro-pedophilia comments on W... NotARepublican55
You mean, he left an explaination on ANI 3 hours ... CharlotteWebb
He left a block summary saying that the account a... thekohser
But like I said, there's a capricious qualit... Somey Contrary to EricBarbour's claims, he's not... EricBarbour I sometimes find myself morbidly fascinated by the... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='Somey' post='224876' date='Sat 6th M... One
One interesting incident that I found with Herost... Viridae
Tax evasion is still tax evasion. It is still a ... Viridae Since when was a talk page explanation required? I... GlassBeadGame Funny that this has degenerated into a discussion ... MZMcBride
Funny that this has degenerated into a discussion... Zoloft So... should editors try to recall Herostratus or ... Malleus
So... should editors try to recall Herostratus or... Zoloft Well, there are a handful of people still mumbling... herostratus You people. Sheesh.
First of all, you start off ... Alison
You people. Sheesh.
First of all, you start off... EricBarbour
First of all, you start off this thread by callin... gomi Is it humanly possible to be more wrong about stuf... Moulton Is it humanly possible to be more wrong about stuf... BelovedFox In a word, no. One of the fundamental aspects of ... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='gomi' post='237998' date='Wed 26th M... NotARepublican55
You people. Sheesh.
First of all, you start off... SuaveArt
Well dude, you're a grown man who writes Wiki... Moulton So how does it feel to AGAIN be blocked from Wikip... EricBarbour So how does it feel to AGAIN be blocked from Wikip... NotARepublican55
[quote name='NotARepublican55' post='238009' date... MZMcBride Eric: That's quite a long way of saying ... GlassBeadGame Is this the guy that made the unfunny "joke... Viridae Apologise for the block Herostratus, it was idioti... Moulton Apologise for the block Herostratus, it was idioti... GlassBeadGame
Apologise for the block Herostratus, it was idiot... jayvdb
Apologise for the block Herostratus, it was idiot... Moulton [quote name='Moulton' post='238157' date='Fri 28th... jayvdb
[quote name='Moulton' post='238157' date='Fri 28t... Moulton [quote name='Moulton' post='238279' date='Sat 29th... jayvdb I hope NetKnowledge works out for you.
Mainly, I h... Moulton [quote name='Moulton' post='238306' date='Sat 29th... jayvdb
Sure, WMF-sponsored projects can continue without... Moulton Sure, WMF-sponsored projects can continue without ... jayvdb
For what it's worth, the WV study project exp... Moulton [quote name='Moulton' post='238374' date='Sun 30th... EricBarbour Apologise for the block Herostratus, it was idioti... herostratus No problem, Viridae. Didn't bother me. I figur...
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |