Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

_ David Gerard _ Gerard takes on the National Portrait Gallery

Posted by: Peter Damian

There’s a lovely rant from Gerard on foundation-l. Apparently the NPG has used some Wikipedia material without permission so (mindful of the legal threat the NPG made to them last year) the wiki-warriors have the pitchforks out.

QUOTE

*Surely* the NPG should be able to figure out that by doing this,
they're leaving themselves wide open to copyright suits from all the
hundreds of thousands of smart, motivated geeks who HIT THE GODDAMN
ROOF when they sent that legal threat. They've so far scraped through
on other people not being the sort of arseholes they were, but I find
it difficult to picture how they've considered that a safe policy
going forward.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-June/066285.html


QUOTE

Absolutely, a non-apocalyptic response is desirable.

However, they're still being blitheringly stupid and obnoxious, and
leaving themselves wide-open. However nice the individual
representatives of the NPG may be, the organisation's behaviour
demonstrates that they don't give a damn.

Would polite but firm notices from those whose personal contributions
have been appropriated by the NPG in violation of copyright help
things along?
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2011-June/066288.html


Posted by: lilburne

This is the stuff that scot mac nicked from Grove publishing or somewhere, changed a few tenses, and swapped some quotes about. They'd be damn lucky to claim copyright on the odd comma, or two.


Posted by: thekohser

QUOTE(lilburne @ Thu 16th June 2011, 8:04am) *

This is the stuff that scot mac nicked from Grove publishing or somewhere, changed a few tenses, and swapped some quotes about. They'd be damn lucky to claim copyright on the odd comma, or two.


How dare you make such an accusation?!

With about http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Michael_Wright&oldid=180713575#References, clearly Scott didn't rearrange words from a Grove publishing resource at all!

laugh.gif



Edit: Oh, wait. Three references to The concise Grove dictionary of art. Damn, you're good, lilburne.