This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
This should a list of the bad actors of Wikipedia. The world should know their names.
They're all irritating fucktards, it's just a question of degree.
I retract this, not all are irritating fucktards. Some are actually quite competent and reasonable;
J. delanoy:delanoy is very professional and doesn't personalise, his range blocks tend toward the shorter end of the spectrum, can't see him blocking an entire country.
Rodhullandemu: Rod is very quick to semi-protect BLP's, which imo is no bad thing.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
QUOTE(RMHED @ Sun 7th March 2010, 2:01pm)
I retract this, not all are irritating fucktards. Some are actually quite competent and reasonable;
J. delanoy:delanoy is very professional and doesn't personalise, his range blocks tend toward the shorter end of the spectrum, can't see him blocking an entire country.
Rodhullandemu: Rod is very quick to semi-protect BLP's, which imo is no bad thing.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 8th March 2010, 12:31am)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Sun 7th March 2010, 2:01pm)
I retract this, not all are irritating fucktards. Some are actually quite competent and reasonable;
J. delanoy:delanoy is very professional and doesn't personalise, his range blocks tend toward the shorter end of the spectrum, can't see him blocking an entire country.
Rodhullandemu: Rod is very quick to semi-protect BLP's, which imo is no bad thing.
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)