QUOTE(tarantino @ Sat 7th March 2009, 1:33pm)
This branch of the thread has seriously drifted off, and should be moved.
With that said, it seems a bit strange that there's been little condemnation of wikileaker. S/he's probably an ex-arb who's retained CU and OS. The information s/he has access to and has leaked is arguably more sensitive.
I guess some of us aren't as worried about ArbCom's dirty little secrets getting released as we are about people's personal docs being dropped along with other such sensitive information that causes real world damage.
And wasn't it already established that Wikileaker screws around with information, so it's not in its original form, or was that someone else that took Arb comments from the list regarding Majorly and tweaked them to be harsher than they were?