Getting back on topic...
At the
bottom of Filll's talk page, we find this...
QUOTE(Filll's Talk Page)
EnoughThis has gone far enough. Stop adding attacks on me to your userspace, accusing me of being a "Wikipedia Review editor." I don't condone or promote that site at all, and on the contrary I was outed by them and members have tried to make disturbing advances on me there. Please stop trying to smear and provoke me. krimpet✽ 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Do not remove material that is part of an Arbcomm proceeding. Thanks. And it did not explicitly label you as a "Wikipedia Review editor", did it? Although you are a member of Wikipedia Review and an editor here, so it is quite accurate, isn't it? --Filll (talk | wpc) 23:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
And yet,
FeloniousMonk cites an evidence page in his own user space that he has since
moved and then
deleted.
Moreover,
Filll refers to the same deleted page at RfC/ID.
And for the record, I've asked that the deleted page (which
still exists on Static Wikipedia) be restored as it has been placed into evidence by two of the ID Editors.