 How do you deal with a cabal? |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TheKartingWikipedian |
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Contributors Posts: 121 Joined: Member No.: 7,007  |
Yes, good old British and Irish disputes again (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif)
So how do you do it on Wikipedia? There's a hard nut of Irish Nationalist editors who stick through thick and thin (mainly thick) to support the twisted POVs of each other. There is no similar cabal of Irish unionist editors to combat the buggers. This is because all editors eligible for that mould work in a most gentlemanly fashion and wouldn't sink so low as to tag team edit. In the list we have, in no particular order (and the list is not exhaustive), One Night in Hackney, an obvious reincarnation (prize if you can guess of who) Mo aim, another relaunch (prize again) BJMullan, a bit of a cunt Domer48, a lot of a cunt Murry1975, a thick prick NorthernCounties, a quiet sort of slimeball Some cunt with an unpronounceable name, and an admin would you believe! Brocach, new kid on the block and someone who'd have us believe he's intelligent Then of course we've got part time admin and general all round scumbag Cailil These gits back each other up to the hilt. How many of them are the same person? Lurking somewhere in there is probably that arch serial sockfucker Wikipéire So how to deal with them. Maybe a unionist sock farm is the only way. Thoughts please. This post has been edited by TheKartingWikipedian: |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| ComeGetMe |
Post
#2
|
|
New Member Group: Contributors Posts: 46 Joined: Member No.: 7,032 |
And Highkings Topic Ban is being reviewed and its likely he'll be back to his old tricks again. TKW, time to get some of those sockies dusted off. I assume VanS was one of yours so that was a setback.
|
|
|
|
| TheKartingWikipedian |
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Contributors Posts: 121 Joined: Member No.: 7,007 |
QUOTE(ComeGetMe @ Fri 1st June 2012, 3:57pm)  And Highkings Topic Ban is being reviewed and its likely he'll be back to his old tricks again. TKW, time to get some of those sockies dusted off. I assume VanS was one of yours so that was a setback. My policy is never to confirm or deny the existence or otherwise of a sock. However, VanSpeijk is a bit of a loss. He was doing some good work and has now been silenced. But, so has Mullan, so maybe his job was done anyway - but wait - arch BI deletor is back, as you said he would be, un-topic-banned and immediately he's away with it. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/nope.gif) Haven't you got to laugh at that clown Cailil and his ramblings. This git has set himself up as the Wikipedia judge , jury and executioner in this matter. How the community has let him get away with it is pretty disgusting, but that's Wikipedia for you. Ho hum! back to the struggle. One bollock brain (bjm, not vs) is silenced as another one is let loose again. Onward into battle !!! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif) This post has been edited by TheKartingWikipedian: |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
TheKartingWikipedian How do you deal with a cabal? 
Emperor Wasn't Ireland starting to finally honor their... TheKartingWikipedian Turns out the biased Cailil is dealing with the pr... EricBarbour Let's see you write up a timeline of the Briti... TheKartingWikipedian An interesting development on the British Isles fr... 
Fusion
An interesting development on the British Isles f... |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |