QUOTE(everyking @ Sat 27th May 2006, 1:09am)
Huh. I don't remember editing my comment. I wouldn't completely rule it out, but I don't recall doing it or even wanting to do it. Is it possible someone else did?
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Sat 27th May 2006, 10:23am)
For the record (this was brought up on that locked thread today), I did not edit the comment that BoingBoing quoted.
QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Sat 27th May 2006, 11:34am)
QUOTE(hades @ Sun 28th May 2006, 3:59am)
Can we at least agree that posts in this thread were altered by someone other than their authors, and that I'm not making it up?
I am not sure that they were altered by someone other than their authors. People can edit their own posts here.
QUOTE(Hushthis @ Sat 27th May 2006, 11:43am)
How about we all agree it might just be a bunch of microfiction published in an ambiguous context and you don't have any right to ask us about it?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
You know, after reading a bunch of the links here showing that wikipedia's admins had done things like reverting articles and talk pages in such a way that edits that were inconvenient to them didn't even show up in the edit history, I was beginning to come around to your point of view. But I see now that it's a tactic you approve of, when it's used in your favor. Nobody on either side of this argument is interested in fighting fair, it seems. What's good for the goose is good for the gander indeed.
Whatever. If I don't have any right to ask about it, then I guess I won't any more.