|
|
|
Raul654 biased... say it ain't so...., admin abusively blocking |
|
|
Kyaa the Catlord |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 68
Joined:
Member No.: 4,108
|
Raul suggests that those who claim he routinely abusively blocks people diametrically opposed to his pov have no ground to stand on and challenges them to bring forth some evidence. And subsequently gets pwned.BAM HEADSHOT.
|
|
|
|
Herschelkrustofsky |
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined:
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130
|
QUOTE(Eleland @ Wed 26th December 2007, 9:57am) This is another case where I'm torn between my dislike of the slightly blockhappy admin involvement, and the blatant idiocy of the POV-pushers who whine about it. For example, one of the anons listed there insisted that the IPCC (as in, everyone who's anyone in climate research) plus the National Academies of Science of the entire G8 plus China and India were "some of the scientific community." It's bad all around at those articles, because the POV of the ones who OWN them, including William Connolly and Raymond Arritt, is that there are no scientists at all that oppose the IPCC viewpoint. In reality, there are substantial numbers of scientists on both sides of the fence, which would appear to be a perfect opportunity to apply the NPOV doctrine, but no, that's not going to happen. Incidentally, the evidence supplied at ANI indicates that Raul654 has ventured into a realm far beyond the "slightly blockhappy."
|
|
|
|
Kyaa the Catlord |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 68
Joined:
Member No.: 4,108
|
QUOTE(Miltopia @ Wed 26th December 2007, 5:39pm) It's not only ok, but responsible in my book, to block (real) POV-pushers and the like. But it needs to be done by uninvolved admins. Why can't Raul654 use dispute resolution like everyone else?
Cause he's a crusader and must protect the walled garden they have carefully crafted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |