The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> WikiAnswers vs Wikianswers, Seth tries to figure out the confusion
Random832
post Fri 13th February 2009, 4:09am
Post #21


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(privatemusings @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:24am) *

Whilst reminding myself of this storm-in-a-teacup broo ha ha, I popped a note into the wiki talk page about the photo, and got a response pretty immediately from Cary.


Aeron chairs, huh.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Fri 13th February 2009, 1:26pm
Post #22


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 13th February 2009, 4:09am) *

QUOTE(privatemusings @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:24am) *

Whilst reminding myself of this storm-in-a-teacup broo ha ha, I popped a note into the wiki talk page about the photo, and got a response pretty immediately from Cary.


Aeron chairs, huh.

That picture is great as a mirror for Wikipedia - I wonder if they will ever get to Featured Office status?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Fri 13th February 2009, 1:52pm
Post #23


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 13th February 2009, 1:28am) *
QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 12:11am) *
Apparently there's an old law still in force in the British Isles that legally entitles a resident of the Isle of Man to kill a Scottish person on sight. Bad history, y'see. Could be an urban myth - I don't know - but it would be interesting to find out what happens in the event of shit happening. I myself have been there several times and have survived, so things are probably OK. I'd see if it's been asked in WikiAnswers, or whatever, but I can't be arsed.

You're safe on the Isle of Man; its "within the city walls of York" where Scotsmen need to worry

I'd never heard of that one. I've always wondered why York folks look at me funny. I used to think it was my habit of muttering to myself and asking perfect strangers highly inappropriate questions. I was right, then.

I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
1. It is illegal to die in the Houses of Parliament.
2. It is an act of treason to place a postage stamp bearing the British monarch upside-down.
3. In Liverpool, it is illegal for a woman to be topless except as a clerk in a tropical fish store.
4. Mince pies cannot be eaten on Christmas.
5. In Scotland, if someone knocks on your door and requires the use of your toilet, you must let them enter.
6. A pregnant woman can legally relieve herself anywhere she wants, including in a policeman's helmet.
7. The head of any dead whale found on the British coast automatically becomes the property of the king, and the tail of the queen.
8. It is illegal to avoid telling the tax man anything you do not want him to know, but legal not to tell him information you do not mind him knowing.
9. It is illegal to enter the Houses of Parliament in a suit of armour.
10. In the city of York it is legal to murder a Scotsman within the ancient city walls, but only if he is carrying a bow and arrow.

Phew! I often carry around strange things, but never a bow and arrow. I'm safe.

QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 13th February 2009, 1:26pm) *
QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 13th February 2009, 4:09am) *
QUOTE(privatemusings @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:24am) *
Whilst reminding myself of this storm-in-a-teacup broo ha ha, I popped a note into the wiki talk page about the photo, and got a response pretty immediately from Cary.

Aeron chairs, huh.

That picture is great as a mirror for Wikipedia - I wonder if they will ever get to Featured Office status?

I'm scared. You see that creature beneath the table? The thing shaped like a cat, but probably isn't? I've got the fear. Bad.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Fri 13th February 2009, 1:57pm
Post #24


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



#9 I can't see the issue with – some of them are outdated, but that one's just as relevant today as it's ever been. Try walking into your local Parliament/Assembly/Congress/State Capitol/any other major public building kitted out in a bullet-proof vest and see how long it takes before security hauls you off to "ask you a few questions".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Fri 13th February 2009, 2:33pm
Post #25


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 13th February 2009, 1:26pm) *

QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 13th February 2009, 4:09am) *

QUOTE(privatemusings @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:24am) *

Whilst reminding myself of this storm-in-a-teacup broo ha ha, I popped a note into the wiki talk page about the photo, and got a response pretty immediately from Cary.


Aeron chairs, huh.

That picture is great as a mirror for Wikipedia - I wonder if they will ever get to Featured Office status?


Here's a promotional video that includes scenes inside and outside WMF headquarters.

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:P...00-15fps-en.ogg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LaraLove
post Fri 13th February 2009, 3:06pm
Post #26


Wikipedia BLP advocate
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(tarantino @ Fri 13th February 2009, 9:33am) *

Here's a promotional video that includes scenes inside and outside WMF headquarters.

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:P...00-15fps-en.ogg

Is there an image anywhere available in which Sue has made some sort of attempt to make herself look professional?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Fri 13th February 2009, 3:20pm
Post #27


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,738
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(LaraLove @ Fri 13th February 2009, 10:06am) *

Is there an image anywhere available in which Sue has made some sort of attempt to make herself look professional?


I remember seeing some kind of airbrushed, blow-dryed, solarized publicity head-shot on her old CBC page that was kinda nice.

Or was that Rachel Marsden ???

I forget …

Ja Ja boing.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post Fri 13th February 2009, 3:31pm
Post #28


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined: Tue 22nd Jan 2008, 1:54am
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 7:52am) *
I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
Source? I ask because the internet epidemic of so-called "loony laws" is sort of a pet peeve of mine. Virtually all of them are hoaxes, and it's telling that virtually none of them are accompanied by citations of the relevant statute (most of them are expressly stated or implied to be statutory). Besides that, many of them are prefaced with a place (e.g. "In Peace River, Alberta...") that doesn't have a government with jurisdiction to enact the alleged law - would the City of York really have the authority to legalize the murder of Scotsmen even if it wanted to? Snopes puts it well in the first couple of paragraphs here.

(The newer version of Balderdash, the board game, includes a category in which players are given the beginning of an alleged such law, and then invited to guess the end of it. For example, I was once given something along the lines of "In Florida, it is illegal to use an elephant...". I finished with "...commit bank fraud", which I felt should have gotten me some points, since, in probable contrast to the so-called "correct answer", it actually is illegal to commit bank fraud in Florida, with or without an elephant.)

So yeah, I'm not saying that your particular list is nonsense, but that's my immediate assumption with these things until I see evidence otherwise.

This post has been edited by Sarcasticidealist: Fri 13th February 2009, 3:40pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Fri 13th February 2009, 3:52pm
Post #29


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Sarcasticidealist @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:31pm) *

QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 7:52am) *
I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
Source? I ask because the internet epidemic of so-called "loony laws" is sort of a pet peeve of mine. Virtually all of them are hoaxes, and it's telling that virtually none of them are accompanied by citations of the relevant statute (most of them are expressly stated or implied to be statutory). Besides that, many of them are prefaced with a place (e.g. "In Peace River, Alberta...") that doesn't have a government with jurisdiction to enact the alleged law - would the City of York really have the authority to legalize the murder of Scotsmen even if it wanted to? Snopes puts it well in the first couple of paragraphs here.

(The newer version of Balderdash, the board game, includes a category in which players are given the beginning of an alleged such law, and then invited to guess the end of it. For example, I was once given something along the lines of "In Florida, it is illegal to use an elephant...". I finished with "...commit bank fraud", which I felt should have gotten me some points, since, in probable contrast to the so-called "correct answer", it actually is illegal to commit bank fraud in Florida, with or without an elephant.)

So yeah, I'm not saying that your particular list is nonsense, but that's my immediate assumption with these things until I see evidence otherwise.

"The head of any dead whale found on the British coast automatically becomes the property of the king, and the tail of the queen" is a genuine English (not British) law inherited from the Vikings via the Normans and still in force (although they're invariably immediately donated to an appropriate research institution by the Receiver of Wreck). Wikipedia's Royal Fish article does an adequate job in summarising the background. In Scotland, it only applies to whales over 25 feet long (reliable source should you really care).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Fri 13th February 2009, 11:34pm
Post #30


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Sarcasticidealist @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:31pm) *
QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 7:52am) *
I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
Source? I ask because the internet epidemic of so-called "loony laws" is sort of a pet peeve of mine.

My strategy is simply to believe everything I read. Simplifies life enormously.
QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Fri 13th February 2009, 3:52pm) *
"The head of any dead whale found on the British coast automatically becomes the property of the king, and the tail of the queen" is a genuine English (not British) law......

And an eminently sensible one, if you ask me. I assume, then, that the middle bit of the whale belongs to the finder? Super. It would go well with my collection of dead seals.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sat 14th February 2009, 4:37am
Post #31


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 6:52am) *

I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
1. It is illegal to die in the Houses of Parliament.


huh.gif No, only in the House of Lords. Since Spencer Perceval

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Sat 14th February 2009, 10:09am
Post #32


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 14th February 2009, 4:37am) *
QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Fri 13th February 2009, 6:52am) *
I've just looked it up, and that law is in the top-ten of silly, still-extant laws:
1. It is illegal to die in the Houses of Parliament.

huh.gif No, only in the House of Lords. Since Spencer Perceval

That's one for the lawyers, eh? The House of Lords being one of the Houses of Parliament, all in the same building. Guy Fawkes had the right idea about how to treat the place. The "White House incident" in 1814, by the way, was an accident. It was my great great great-ish grandad. He only intended to burn some curtains; a harmless prank, but shit happened. As for poor old Spence, he was the one who was shot and said "I am murdered". Mr. Obvious!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sat 14th February 2009, 10:24am
Post #33


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



offtopic.gif

QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Sat 14th February 2009, 2:09am) *

That's one for the lawyers, eh? The House of Lords being one of the Houses of Parliament, all in the same building. Guy Fawkes had the right idea about how to treat the place. The "White House incident" in 1814, by the way, was an accident. It was my great great great-ish grandad. He only intended to burn some curtains; a harmless prank, but shit happened. As for poor old Spence, he was the one who was shot and said "I am murdered". Mr. Obvious!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sat 14th February 2009, 5:34pm
Post #34


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Sat 14th February 2009, 3:09am) *

The "White House incident" in 1814, by the way, was an accident. It was my great great great-ish grandad. He only intended to burn some curtains; a harmless prank, but shit happened.

Lenny Bruce. "Okay. I'll admit it. We Jews did kill Christ. What can I say? It was a party. It got out of control...."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
michael
post Sat 14th February 2009, 9:37pm
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri 9th Mar 2007, 12:47am
Member No.: 1,097



WikiAnswers is amazingly stupid. The things some people ask blindside me. I've always had a great deal of respect for the WMF projects and have never vandalized, but dear lord, I'm tempted to troll with bad answers there.

This post has been edited by michael: Sat 14th February 2009, 9:37pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wales Hunter
post Sat 14th February 2009, 10:57pm
Post #36


Hackenslasher
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 869
Joined: Sun 30th Dec 2007, 11:29pm
Member No.: 4,319

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE

http://answers.wikia.com/wiki/How_do_you_eat

Q. How do you eat?

A. Put food in mouth. Chew. Swallow. Repeat.


QUOTE

http://answers.wikia.com/wiki/How_do_you_finger_a_girl

Q. How do you finger a girl?

A. With your finger. you stick 2 fingers into her pussy and move it in and out until she squirts
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sat 14th February 2009, 10:59pm
Post #37


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(The Wales Hunter @ Sat 14th February 2009, 3:57pm) *

QUOTE

http://answers.wikia.com/wiki/How_do_you_eat

Q. How do you eat?

A. Put food in mouth. Chew. Swallow. Repeat.


QUOTE

http://answers.wikia.com/wiki/How_do_you_finger_a_girl

Q. How do you finger a girl?

A. With your finger. you stick 2 fingers into her pussy and move it in and out until she squirts



Hey, this could turn into a compendium of all the world's knowledge. Quick, do more. wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bottled_Spider
post Sun 15th February 2009, 12:57pm
Post #38


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun 11th Jan 2009, 8:27pm
From: Pictland
Member No.: 9,708



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 14th February 2009, 10:59pm) *
Hey, this could turn into a compendium of all the world's knowledge. Quick, do more. wink.gif

Tut. That would be totally off-topic. Perish the thought. Everyone seems to be too busy criticizing the awful Wiki answers thing (or is it answers Wikia?) to notice Answers.com. I input two of the entries given above, and the difference in "tone" of the answers is shocking.

"How do you eat" elicited this brilliant response. Now that's what I call an answer.

"How do you finger a girl" was disappointing, in the sense that it didn't tell me how to do it, but as you can see here it gave a lot of links to, erm, Wiki Answers (or answers Wikia, or whatever). Simple Wiki admins & checkusers will be delighted with most of those links, so, guys, don't skimp on that "bookmark this page" button.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Sun 15th February 2009, 1:02pm
Post #39


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Sun 15th February 2009, 3:20pm
Post #40


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bottled_Spider @ Sun 15th February 2009, 7:57am) *

"How do you eat" elicited this brilliant response. Now that's what I call an answer.


There doesn't seem to have been any intelligence (natural or artificial) put into that reply... it just produces, by an automated query, the entries for "eat" in a variety of reference sources, including Wikipedia, where the entry concerns a U.K. restaurant chain of that name.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 3:43am