Who gets the WR endorsement for Arbcom09, Could be the kiss of death? Options

[Doc glasgow]

OK, there's going to be lots of useless exit polls, so let's get in first with our pre-poll.

The winner gets a lovely "endorsed by Wikipedia Review" banner (yet to be designed) to put on their nomination. Should be worth a few votes to them.

[Sarcasticidealist]

I have to say, Doc, when I saw the topic "Who gets the WR endorsement for Arbcom09" pop up with your name as the most recent contributor, I assumed that some Wikipedia fanboy had started the thread and you'd retorted by dourly asking them to focus on something more consequential.

Still, what fun! But are radio button polls the only format supported by this site?

[Doc glasgow]

Still, what fun! But are radio button polls the only format supported by this site?

Yes, 'tis a pity we can't have a multi-option mimic of the arbcom poll

[CharlotteWebb]

Still, what fun! But are radio button polls the only format supported by this site?

Yes, 'tis a pity we can't have a multi-option mimic of the arbcom poll

I guess you could re-do with buttons for each candidate in a separate section e.g.

Kurt Weber
[x] support
[   ] oppose

Or maybe just "not support" if the actual ballot has no "oppose" option, shrug.

[Herschelkrustofsky]

I guess you could re-do with buttons for each candidate in a separate section e.g.

Kurt Weber
[x] support
[   ] oppose

Or maybe just "not support" if the actual ballot has no "oppose" option, shrug.

Trying to devise a workable poll with this software is a headache. Kirill wasn't my first choice, but I wish I could have voted for him as a secondary option, as he seems semi-reasonable. There ought to be an option as well to have Fred Bauder exiled to ED.