QUOTE(everyking @ Thu 3rd December 2009, 12:25am)
So you're actually taking some positions here as a candidate: you're opposed to ArbCom transparency, and you're in favor of me getting run over by a dump truck (again). I guess I have to at least give you a point for honesty.
1. I'm opposed to the degree of transparency that I understand you to be asking for, yes. I think this David Gerard case is one in which, with the benefit of hindsight, ArbCom probably should have been somewhat less open about its deliberations.
2. I'm fairly up on the situation that led to your desysop. I'm much less up on the Phil Sandifer situation. If I'm elected and the situation comes up, I'll evaluate it at that time (or recuse, if you feel that I couldn't be impartial given our interactions here). I'm certainly not going to go promising specific votes on cases that may or may not come up.
3. I have not stopped beating my wife.