 Destiny, another crap article |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peter Damian |
Post
#1
|
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!  Group: Regulars Posts: 4,400 Joined: Member No.: 4,212  |
The Maverick Philosopher today on philosophy in Wikipedia http://maverickphilosopher.typepad.com/mav...-wikipedia.html
QUOTE "I won't continue through the passage. It is bad throughout. What I hated about teaching was having to wade through garbage like this. How does one explain to an incompetent writer what competent writing is?" |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| EricBarbour |
Post
#2
|
|
blah Group: Regulars Posts: 5,919 Joined: Member No.: 5,066 |
This is what you need, more actual philosophers looking at Wikipedia articles about philosophy closely,
and realizing they are incoherent. And talking about it. Logic and epistemology, among other areas, are places where bad writing is not merely bad---it makes the whole endeavour pointless. It shows where Wikipedia falls down badly. When it's spewing statistics or the names of frigging Codename: Kids Next Door episodes, crowdsourcing works. Anything more subtle or complex is a major issue with the "magic" of crowdsourcing. For some things, you must have an expert. Wikipedia will go to its digital grave, refusing to admit that. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Peter Damian Destiny 
Emperor Nice blog entry.
I skimmed the Wikipedia article ... Zoloft
The Maverick Philosopher today on philosophy in W... 
It's the blimp, Frank
As a sometimes paid editor, and one who has taug... TungstenCarbide The Maverick Philosopher today on philosophy in Wi... Peter Damian
[quote name='Peter Damian' post='298164' date='Sa... |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |