FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Google and Wikipedia -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Google and Wikipedia, ..strong indications that they cooperate
Zvetiki
post
Post #1


Neophyte


Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined:
Member No.: 1,072



Researchers at TU Graz have issued a report on the power of Google, which I have not seen mentioned here; ignore this message if it already had been discussed.

This report investigates the power that Google has over current information reception today. We all know that what does not exist in Google is hardly visible to the world; and obviously, the ordering of search results has a big influence on what kind of information the interested searcher gets to see.

Of particular interest to the readers of this board may be the section, "Empirical Evidence of the Google-Wikipedia Connection", investigating the position of Wikipedia entries in search results on Google and other search engines.

QUOTE
Since most material that is written today is based on Google and Wikipedia, if those two do
not reflect reality, the picture we are getting through “googeling reality” as Stephan Weber
calls it, is not reality, but the Google-Wikipedia version of reality. There are strong indications
that Google and Wikipedia cooperate: some sample statistics show that random selected
entries in Wikipedia are consistently rated higher in Google than in other search engines.

...

The other conclusion is scary: Google does in a strange and unknown way privilege Wikipedia entries –
followed by Yahoo; and Google does this intentionally more with the German version.


The full report is available from TU Graz.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Emperor
post
Post #2


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



Encyc.org has the most Google juice on:

"wikipedia disgraceful" nevermind, it changed still have "wikipedia disgraceful edits" though.

and

"reasons not to contribute to wikipedia"

and just gets edged out by Wikipedia Review on:

"reasons why wikipedia is a gigantic threat to civilization"

This post has been edited by Emperor:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Emperor @ Mon 3rd December 2007, 3:08pm) *

Encyc.org has the most Google juice on:

"wikipedia disgraceful" nevermind, it changed still have "wikipedia disgraceful edits" though.

and

"reasons not to contribute to wikipedia"

and just gets edged out by Wikipedia Review on:

"reasons why wikipedia is a gigantic threat to civilization"


No fair using quotation marks, Emperor. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/ph34r.gif)

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)