FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2943 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Unimportant Decision 2010 -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Unimportant Decision 2010
The Wordsmith
post
Post #21


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 21,628



Well folks, looks like its election season again. Up for grabs are 11 ArbCom seats (9 two-year terms and two one-year terms vacated by Fritpoll and Vanished 6551232), unless our Dear F(l)ounder changes things to get his favourites on Arbcom.

At this point, NewYorkBrad and SirFozzie are pursuing re-election. The terms of FayssalF, Shell Kinney and Carcharoth are also expiring, but no word yet on what they'll do.

A few non-arbs have declared their candidacy: PhilKnight, Harej, and Chase me Ladies, I'm the Cavalry.


Its very early in the game, but any thoughts on this year's horse race?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jayvdb
post
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 271
Joined:
From: Melbourne, Australia
Member No.: 1,039



QUOTE(The Wordsmith @ Tue 16th November 2010, 8:37am) *

At this point, NewYorkBrad and SirFozzie are pursuing re-election. The terms of FayssalF, Shell Kinney and Carcharoth are also expiring, but no word yet on what they'll do.

Carcharoth has said he won't be a candidate in this election.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post
Post #23


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined:
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



Oh, is it time to shuffle the deck chairs again? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/bored.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/yecch.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/yak.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/sick.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Doc glasgow
post
Post #24


Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,138
Joined:
From: at home
Member No.: 90



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 12:48pm) *



You should run. It would be the troll of the century.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post
Post #25


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined:
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 16th November 2010, 8:32am) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 12:48pm) *
You should run. It would be the troll of the century.
I'm sure I'm ineligible; they have been progressively upping the edit count requirements to run and to vote so as to exclude trolls like me from consideration. Several people were very upset that I voted last year.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
radek
post
Post #26


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined:
Member No.: 15,651



QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 16th November 2010, 9:32am) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 12:48pm) *



You should run. It would be the troll of the century.


How about you Doc?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post
Post #27


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined:
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 9:41am) *

QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 16th November 2010, 8:32am) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 12:48pm) *
You should run. It would be the troll of the century.
I'm sure I'm ineligible; they have been progressively upping the edit count requirements to run and to vote so as to exclude trolls like me from consideration. Several people were very upset that I voted last year.


Do you need recent edits to vote, or just lifetime edits? I haven't done much editing lately.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post
Post #28


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined:
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 16th November 2010, 9:43am) *
Do you need recent edits to vote, or just lifetime edits? I haven't done much editing lately.
They typically require a hundred or so edits in the past year to vote, and several hundred to a thousand in order to run. Pretty much limits the field to vandalwhackers and other obsessive types.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wordsmith
post
Post #29


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 21,628



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 2:41pm) *

QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 16th November 2010, 8:32am) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 12:48pm) *
You should run. It would be the troll of the century.
I'm sure I'm ineligible; they have been progressively upping the edit count requirements to run and to vote so as to exclude trolls like me from consideration. Several people were very upset that I voted last year.


It requires 1,000 lifetime edits to articlespace, and that you be over 18. You appear to be eligible to run. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing it happen.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Doc glasgow
post
Post #30


Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,138
Joined:
From: at home
Member No.: 90



QUOTE
During this time, any editor in good standing who has made at least 1,000 mainspace edits before the opening of the nomination period and is of legal age and over 18 in their jurisdiction may nominate themselves



Looks like you are eligible.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post
Post #31


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined:
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Doc glasgow
post
Post #32


Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,138
Joined:
From: at home
Member No.: 90



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:20pm) *

I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.


Oh, go on. I'll be your campaign manager, and I'm sure we can arrange an endorsement from the proprietors of Wikipedia Review. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wordsmith
post
Post #33


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 21,628



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:20pm) *

I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.


That's too bad, it would be fun to see. There aren't expected to be very many candidates this year, so you might even win! No way Jimbo would ever appoint you, but it would expose his hypocracy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post
Post #34


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined:
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(The Wordsmith @ Tue 16th November 2010, 11:37am) *
That's too bad, it would be fun to see. There aren't expected to be very many candidates this year, so you might even win! No way Jimbo would ever appoint you, but it would expose his hypocracy.
I'm sure if I announced a candidacy people would fall out of the woodwork to run against me. I'm not interested in spurring interest in wikiwanking, though.

Besides, I'd have to come up with a platform. Not to mention answering all those obnoxious candidate questions, although it would be fun to see how many times I can get blocked while doing so. Is "You stupid git!" currently considered incivil?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #35


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



I can attest that a run for ArbCom can be great fun, but it really does take a lot of time to do it right.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gomi
post
Post #36


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined:
Member No.: 565



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 9:20am) *
I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.

I hereby pledge $100 to your favorite charity.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post
Post #37


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(The Wordsmith @ Tue 16th November 2010, 3:37am) *

Its very early in the game, but any thoughts on this year's horse race?


I don't see any horses. I just see a bunch of slobs with too much time on their hands. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)

And what's with Chase Me in this pack? Isn't he supposed to be serving Queen and Country? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post
Post #38


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212



QUOTE(The Wordsmith @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:37pm) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:20pm) *

I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.


That's too bad, it would be fun to see. There aren't expected to be very many candidates this year, so you might even win! No way Jimbo would ever appoint you, but it would expose his hypocracy.


Oi I thought you disapproved of destroying Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=305729709 . And what are you doing in this nest of trolls anyway?

This post has been edited by Peter Damian:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Wordsmith
post
Post #39


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 21,628



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Tue 16th November 2010, 10:35pm) *

QUOTE(The Wordsmith @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:37pm) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 16th November 2010, 5:20pm) *

I am nowhere near bored enough to do it, though. Perhaps if someone offered to pay me.


That's too bad, it would be fun to see. There aren't expected to be very many candidates this year, so you might even win! No way Jimbo would ever appoint you, but it would expose his hypocracy.


Oi I thought you disapproved of destroying Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=305729709 . And what are you doing in this nest of trolls anyway?


I *do* disapprove of destroying Wikipedia. Sometimes a shock to the system can be theraputic, though.

Yes, trolls come here, but so do other people. It is a place to discuss Wikipedia, and here I can say things that I can't say on-wiki.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A User
post
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 5,813



QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 17th November 2010, 5:40am) *

I don't see any horses. I just see a bunch of slobs with too much time on their hands. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)


No pastors this year either (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)