QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 27th September 2011, 10:00pm)
Waalkes seems to have hit a nerve with
this line of questioning, because before poor Will can even answer, Mathsci is well nigh soiling himself for concern over what he evidently perceives as danger to his venerated nozzlee. Change the subject! Change the subject!
Argumentum ad hominem is a
logical fallacy. I assume Mathsci is over 18 years of age and should know better than to use logical fallacies in a debate, especially in a medium requiring collaboration in order to accomplish a goal. If he isn't over 18, then his editing might benefit from some adult supervision.