The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia page the latest status symbol - Washington Post
Newsfeed
post Mon 22nd October 2007, 8:26pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885




Wikipedia page the latest status symbol
Washington Post, United States -32 minutes ago
By Jennifer Ablan NEW YORK (Reuters) - They say if you can make it in New York you can make it anywhere. But these days, it seems you haven't really made it ...


View the article[br]
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Mon 22nd October 2007, 9:54pm
Post #2


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE
Unlike popular networking sites MySpace and Facebook, Wikipedia doesn't allow people to post profiles of themselves.

Instead, Wikipedia entries are earned.

Is the Washington Post really that naive?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Tue 23rd October 2007, 12:30am
Post #3


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Who Is Writing This Clueless Tripe ???

It Can Only Be Some Kind Of PR Campaign Orchestrated By The Wik-IT Witch Of Wikiputia —

I See Wave Upon Wave Of Flying Monkeys Descending On Every Clueless Noob-Paper On The Planet —

Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 23rd October 2007, 12:32am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Tue 23rd October 2007, 2:53am
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Mon 22nd October 2007, 8:30pm) *

Who Is Writing This Clueless Tripe ???

It's none other than Jennifer Ablan. Don't you think she's about famous enough for her own article on Wikipedia now?

In the meantime, let's watch the articles about journalist Howard Altman and musician Steve Knight. I wonder if any outlandish libel about them might change their minds about how "cool" and "exciting" Wikipedia is? I'm not advocating the libel. I'm just saying... watch long enough, and it's going to arrive there.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Tue 23rd October 2007, 3:34am
Post #5


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 22nd October 2007, 10:53pm) *

QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Mon 22nd October 2007, 8:30pm) *

Who Is Writing This Clueless Tripe ???


It's none other than Jennifer Ablan. Don't you think she's about famous enough for her own article on Wikipedia now?

In the meantime, let's watch the articles about journalist Howard Altman and musician Steve Knight. I wonder if any outlandish libel about them might change their minds about how "cool" and "exciting" Wikipedia is? I'm not advocating the libel. I'm just saying... watch long enough, and it's going to arrive there.

Greg


I'm guessing that some sort of accident involving 2-finger poi obstructed the aural channel between her ears and her brain at the very moment when Walter Cronkite was transmitting this advice to young journalists:

QUOTE(Ben Wood @ 21 Mar 1998)

Cronkite was asked if the media has too much power. He said, "Sure the press has power, but the issue and question is the misuse of it. Way too often the attribution of the 'anonymous source' comes up. The press uses that attribution too loosely. Not good." He said in his day, an editor would need two people "on-the-record" to verify a story. Advice for young journalists: "The press has been under scrutiny for all sorts of reasons, and young journalists can change that by getting the facts straight and doing lots of research."

Source. Ben Wood, 21 March 1998.


Lotsa Research !? — But That Wood Be Hard !!!

Looks like it's time to dust off that old King Kamehameha J.URL.ISM Trophy …

We may have a winner !!!

Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 23rd October 2007, 3:54am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Yehudi
post Thu 25th October 2007, 12:08pm
Post #6


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed 6th Dec 2006, 10:52pm
Member No.: 694



QUOTE(guy @ Mon 22nd October 2007, 10:54pm) *

QUOTE
Unlike popular networking sites MySpace and Facebook, Wikipedia doesn't allow people to post profiles of themselves.

Instead, Wikipedia entries are earned.

Is the Washington Post really that naive?

Yes, that rather contradicts the "anyone can edit" bit that presumably the Washington Post is aware of. I keep coming across obvious vanity articles, presumably by the subject or a close friend or relative. It's not exactly difficult to make people look notable.


This post has been edited by Yehudi: Thu 25th October 2007, 12:09pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 7:07am