FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Suggestion and Warning: Do NOT give out your Wikipedia username here -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Suggestion and Warning: Do NOT give out your Wikipedia username here, If you are still an active user of Wikipedia, and not an administrator
blissyu2
post
Post #1


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined:
From: Australia
Member No.: 5



From past experience, Wikipedia hates this forum, and will use any excuse to censor it out of Wikipedia, including banning anyone who posts here. They do not ban EVERYONE. They do not even ban everyone who posts here as a critic. However, it does greatly increase your chances of being banned if you post here using your real Wikipedia username. Since we don't want to see everyone get banned, and since we hate unfair bans, or for this forum to be the cause of some poor soul getting unfairly banned (or linked in any way to it) I think that we should recommend to people not to give your Wikipedia username. However, this is not for everyone.

If you are a banned user, and you want to protest your ban, it is a GOOD idea to say your Wikipedia username.

If you are someone who was otherwise seriously unfairly treated on Wikipedia (e.g. Nathan recently) then it is probably a half decent idea to say your Wikipedia username.

If you are someone who is here purely to destroy this forum or to bash critics, Wikipedia will probably love you, welcome you in to the cabal, give you a promotion, and so forth, if you say your Wikipedia username.

If you are a well-known critic (e.g. Matthew White, Andrew Orlowski, Daniel Brandt), then it is probably a good idea to say your real name, to identify yourself as such, but Wikipedia username probably not.

If you are an administrator, then it is probably fair enough for you to use your Wikipedia username. Thus far only one administrator has been desysopped purely for using this forum (Karmafist) and only one other had this as a part of the cause (Guanaco) - although actually he may hypothetically have been desysopped anyway. But you are generally fairly safe.

So if administrators want to come here to criticise Wikipedia, from our experience it is probably fairly safe for you to do so. For everyone else, well, its a bad idea.

Of course, its your choice whether to take this message to heed. For some, they would rather die for truth than live a lie. For people like that, hey, you may as well say who you are and go down for what you believe in.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
danielshays
post
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 56
Joined:
Member No.: 159



QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Mon 22nd May 2006, 7:00am) *

From past experience, Wikipedia hates this forum, and will use any excuse to censor it out of Wikipedia, including banning anyone who posts here. They do not ban EVERYONE. They do not even ban everyone who posts here as a critic. However, it does greatly increase your chances of being banned if you post here using your real Wikipedia username. Since we don't want to see everyone get banned, and since we hate unfair bans, or for this forum to be the cause of some poor soul getting unfairly banned (or linked in any way to it) I think that we should recommend to people not to give your Wikipedia username. However, this is not for everyone.

If you are a banned user, and you want to protest your ban, it is a GOOD idea to say your Wikipedia username.

It is way past any of this.

If you are someone who was otherwise seriously unfairly treated on Wikipedia (e.g. Nathan recently) then it is probably a half decent idea to say your Wikipedia username.

If you are someone who is here purely to destroy this forum or to bash critics, Wikipedia will probably love you, welcome you in to the cabal, give you a promotion, and so forth, if you say your Wikipedia username.

If you are a well-known critic (e.g. Matthew White, Andrew Orlowski, Daniel Brandt), then it is probably a good idea to say your real name, to identify yourself as such, but Wikipedia username probably not.

If you are an administrator, then it is probably fair enough for you to use your Wikipedia username. Thus far only one administrator has been desysopped purely for using this forum (Karmafist) and only one other had this as a part of the cause (Guanaco) - although actually he may hypothetically have been desysopped anyway. But you are generally fairly safe.

So if administrators want to come here to criticise Wikipedia, from our experience it is probably fairly safe for you to do so. For everyone else, well, its a bad idea.

Of course, its your choice whether to take this message to heed. For some, they would rather die for truth than live a lie. For people like that, hey, you may as well say who you are and go down for what you believe in.


I am ready to die for what I believe in, defending wildlife, freedom of speech and the right to defend it any possible ways, and fighting against inhuman monster machines.

It's gone past cabal stage and has been for a while. At the time they banned Merecat and thewolfstar was when they started to crack down. It is not a cabal anymore. It went from cabal or oligarchy to straight out dicatorship. At the very time we were banned, users were getting blocked and banned left and right. I am not afraid to say I am thewolfstar. That's my perogative. It doesn't matter anymore anyway. It is so easy to create other users, who cares. I keep posting my protests and defenses for a reason. I am working hard at shaking them up, which is easy cause they are a bunch of sleasy liars and they are also not very bright. They CAN be stopped. And it's important that they BE STOPPED.
This is way bigger than just Wikipedia. Daniel Brandt is right. Wikipedia and Google are in it together and Yahoo and MSN, also, are the biggest spreaders of lies and propanganda on the internet now. Searches are completely censored right now. Search for anything like religion and see what you come up with. Nothing but crap. If any of you think I am not thewolfstar, and I can understand paranoia and lack of trust, I learned it on Wikipedia, send me an email. <comments@earthhopenetwork.net> or <contact@earthhopenetwork.net> or <maggie@earthhopenetwork.net>

And listen to this. I have an email box <thewolfstar@gmail.com> and Google and Wikipedia are holding it hostage. I can't get into it no matter what I do. I had a bad feeling about it last night and sure as shit, this morning I couldn't access it no matter what I did. I told Google I'm going to sue them and I will. (I was having a war with Wikien-1 list admins and other assholes like J prasad who is a real sicko, and this email box was being used.

And Daniel Brandt, I know how we can sue them for sure. Are you interested? I need help with this battle. Don't worry, I know how to be discreet when I have to and I am walking softly in certain ways and when it is necessary. I didn't check my email yet. Be back. thewolfstar

This post has been edited by danielshays:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)