_ Bureaucracy _ The 5th annual "WP:DICK of Distinction" awards pageant
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Happy Boxing Day, everyone! The annual "WP:DICK of Distinction" awards pageant is a semi-hallowed tradition here at the Review (new members, http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081117/the-wikipedia-review-awards-pageants/#more-191 for some background.) To compete for the grand WP:DICK of Distinction prize, the contestant must be an active admin or admin defrocked over the past year.
Here are the categories for nomination:
WP:DICK of Distinction -- for all-around rottenness by an admin
The Tag-Team Event
Miss Incongeniality
and for the good guys...
the Straight Shooter award for honest admins
and the Cojones de latón, for the non-admin who has distinguished himself in combat with the cabal
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 9:15am)
Happy Boxing Day, everyone! The annual "WP:DICK of Distinction" awards pageant is a semi-hallowed tradition here at the Review (new members, http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081117/the-wikipedia-review-awards-pageants/#more-191 for some background.) To compete for the grand WP:DICK of Distinction prize, the contestant must be an active admin or admin defrocked over the past year.
Here are the categories for nomination:
WP:DICK of Distinction -- for all-around rottenness by an admin
The Tag-Team Event
Miss Incongeniality
and for the good guys...
the Straight Shooter award for honest admins
and the Cojones de latón, for the non-admin who has distinguished himself in combat with the cabal
WP:DICK of Distinction -- Tiptoety (T-C-L-K-R-D)
a dick among dicks... a true brown log, to rise in to the top of the Wikipediot Cesspool. A little boy, who will never be a man, a child of wiki and the brain damaged fool he shown himself to be.
Posted by: Lar
As in past years, once the poll is set up, please make sure that voters can abstain in some categories. My votes will only be for the good guys.
Obvious nom for Cojones, as in past years, is Cla68.
Obvious nom for Straight Shooter, as in past years, is Doc Glasgow/Scott Macdonald.
(from 30,000 feet... thank you Google for free wireless)
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
I agree entirely with your nomination of the artist formerly known as Doc glasgow (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, for his ground-breaking role in confronting the BLP marauders.
In the WP:DICK category, I would like to nominate Georgewilliamherbert (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who has long gone unrecognized as a versatile and devious hitman in the service of numerous POV-pushing rouge admins. Tiptoety is also a good call.
Posted by: Peter Damian
I love your Sgt Pepper collage. The one of Gerard is particularly good.
I nominate Sandstein for dick of distinction, but second your choices of GWH and Tiptoety ('a true brown log to rise to the surface of the Wikipedia cesspool'). I would nominate Victim of Censorship for cojones, but is there a requirement for a 'fixed abode' over there?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:59am)
I love your Sgt Pepper collage.
It's actually http://globalia.net/donlope/fz/lyrics/We're_Only_In_It_For_The_Money.html, with a few relevant insertions.
I think that IronDuke (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is a natural for Miss Incongeniality.
Posted by: gomi
I would like to propose a new award category, if anyone is interested: Most Vexatious Litigant in an ArbCom Fiasco. I don't have a favorite for this, but I do think we've been remiss in not awarding a DICKie for ArbCom-related activities.
I would also like to propose the category Forgotten, but not Gone (or something better), for those who have largely faded from view, but remain more subtly evil, for example Jayjg (T-C-L-K-R-D)
and SlimVirgin (T-C-L-K-R-D)
.
As re IronDuke (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, I second that eructation.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(gomi @ Sun 26th December 2010, 11:30am)
I would like to propose a new award category, if anyone is interested: Most Vexatious Litigant in an ArbCom Fiasco. I don't have a favorite for this, but I do think we've been remiss in not awarding a DICKie for ArbCom-related activities.
We need a Knob-polisher of Distinction. Somebody with cheeks like beefsteak and the salivary glands of an elephant. Someone who swallows.
I nominate QuackGuru, prime fluffer and buffer of Jimbo's bio and TALK pages.
Posted by: TungstenCarbide
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 3:15pm)
Here are the categories for nomination:
WP:DICK of Distinction -- for all-around rottenness by an admin
The Tag-Team Event
Miss Incongeniality
and for the good guys...
the Straight Shooter award for honest admins
and the Cojones de latón, for the non-admin who has distinguished himself in combat with the cabal
I know he doesn't fit into any categories, but Baseball Bugs has to be one of the most worthless, irritating drama whores in existence.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 12:16pm)
I agree entirely with your nomination of the artist formerly known as Doc glasgow (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, for his ground-breaking role in confronting the BLP marauders.
In the WP:DICK category, I would like to nominate Georgewilliamherbert (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who has long gone unrecognized as a versatile and devious hitman in the service of numerous POV-pushing rouge admins. Tiptoety is also a good call.
I think you guys have Tiptoety all wrong.
(also from 30,000 feet but a different flight)
Posted by: lilburne
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Sun 26th December 2010, 6:41pm)
I know he doesn't fit into any categories, but Baseball Bugs has to be one of the most worthless, irritating drama whores in existence.
Complete agreement on that one. The kooks have the http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/ either of which would be a perfect fit for BB. Perhaps the http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a181/scratchpad/0001.jpg would be a fitting accolade for him.
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
I'm thinking Smashville for DICK. He spends a lot of time taunting editors who make unblock requests.
Posted by: Ottava
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 4:14pm)
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
Pinning that C.F. on the Commons admins and stewards as a class? I call BS.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Lar @ Sun 26th December 2010, 3:26pm)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 4:14pm)
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
Pinning that C.F. on the Commons admins and stewards as a class? I call BS.
Please read before responding.
I specified those who abused their ops. There were many - those who wheel warred in deletions, blocking those who complained, blocking those who merely pointed out that allowing pedophiles to run rampant was a problem, etc.
Hell, one admin even replaced the main page with a cuss filled rant against Jimbo for daring to remove the excessive porn. If you think that is acceptable behavior, then you can refer to such mentality as exactly why you were removed from being a Steward.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(gomi @ Sun 26th December 2010, 10:30am)
I would like to propose a new award category, if anyone is interested: Most Vexatious Litigant in an ArbCom Fiasco. I don't have a favorite for this, but I do think we've been remiss in not awarding a DICKie for ArbCom-related activities.
How about Baseball Bugs? He is everywhere on AN/I and on various arbcommy areas. Saying much, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Baseball+Bugs nothing.
Or perhaps he deserves a special-achievement award of some kind?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 26th December 2010, 2:19pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Sun 26th December 2010, 10:30am)
I would like to propose a new award category, if anyone is interested: Most Vexatious Litigant in an ArbCom Fiasco. I don't have a favorite for this, but I do think we've been remiss in not awarding a DICKie for ArbCom-related activities.
How about Baseball Bugs? He is everywhere on AN/I and on various arbcommy areas. Saying much, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Baseball+Bugs nothing.
Or perhaps he deserves a special-achievement award of some kind?
I think that manic WikiLawyers, Porn Protectors, and Knob Polishers can all be subsumed under the general DICK category. I don't want to make things too elaborate, and plus the construction of the actual voting poll is extremely labor-intensive as it is. However, I am sympathetic to Gomi's comments about Slim and Jayjg-- perhaps some lifetime achievement awards may be in order. Those aren't submitted to the voters -- it's in the hands of the Program and Catering Committee or Loya Jirga. I'm sure that Slim would be honored to share that award with the only previous recipient, PoetGuy.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:59am)
I would nominate Victim of Censorship for cojones, but is there a requirement for a 'fixed abode' over there?
Two Dicks of Distinction were a pair of former mop-swingers that went out with bizarre displays of self-destructive behavior: Tanthalas39 and Rlvese. This will probably be the last that we see of them (under those names, at least).
Our man Coffee also retired in 2010, albeit not as dramatically, but he was a wee dick in the months leading up to his sign-off.
And, of course, Cirt, for reasons that do not require repeating.
The Straight Shooter Award: Juliancolton. Last year, we had a lot of fun at Juliancolton's expense, but a check at his recent contribution record shows that he is dramatically easing off the Wiki-addiction and is playing on Wikipedia in a far more mature and measured output. Today is also his birthday, so happy 17th to a genuine diamond!
Cojones: Our favorite paisan, Giano, for injecting some much-needed oxygen into the ghastly dull Arbcom election.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Very good, Sir. Have we no nominees for Tag Team?
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Sun 26th December 2010, 5:57pm)
Two Dicks of Distinction were a pair of former mop-swingers that went out with bizarre displays of self-destructive behavior: Tanthalas39 and Rlvese. This will probably be the last that we see of them (under those names, at least).
Our man Coffee also retired in 2010, albeit not as dramatically, but he was a wee dick in the months leading up to his sign-off.
And, of course, Cirt, for reasons that do not require repeating.
The Straight Shooter Award: Juliancolton. Last year, we had a lot of fun at Juliancolton's expense, but a check at his recent contribution record shows that he is dramatically easing off the Wiki-addiction and is playing on Wikipedia in a far more mature and measured output. Today is also his birthday, so happy 17th to a genuine diamond!
Cojones: Our favorite paisan, Giano, for injecting some much-needed oxygen into the ghastly dull Arbcom election.
Posted by: EricBarbour
Hold on. Does anyone else think we should review the past DICK awards, so we can at least be aware someone is getting a double award? If nothing else, it will help to maintain a bit of "historical balance" . I'd feel better if certain people were excluded from winning multiple awards. SV is already out, both for behaving herself in 2010 and for being such a popular pest in the previous 4 years. I would say similar things for both JzG and Gerard. And Cla68, Thatcher, Alison already got kudos as straight shooters. Should the following be excluded from subsequent award votes? And what about http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=28147&view=findpost&p=216758
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=6834 DICK winner: tie, Cyde and SV Runner-Up: Jayjg Miss Incongeniality: SV Straight Shooter: Tawker
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15604 DICK: JzG Runner-Up: same Miss Incongeniality: same Tag Team: Crum375 and SV Straight Shooter: Giano Straight Shooter runner-up: Alison
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=22736 DICK: tie, Gerard and FT2 Runner-Up: Gerard Miss Incongeniality: tie, Elonka and JzG Tag Team: Odd nature, Salmon of Doubt, KillerChihuahua, Jim62sch, Mu301 and FeloniousMonk Straight Shooter: Thatcher Straight Shooter runner-up: same Cojones: Cla68 Cojones runner-up: same
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=28147 DICK: David Gerard Runner-Up: same Miss Incongeniality: same Tag Team: SV and Will Beback Straight Shooter: Alison Cojones: Cla68
Posted by: EricBarbour
Furthermore, I absolutely think Cirt should be put up for the DICK award.
In the past 2 years, Cirt has successfully defamed an unknown number of people in their BLPs, simply for association with the Church of Scientology, Transcendental Meditation, or EST. Plus, don't forget that Cirt has been caught doing what appears to be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daryl_Wine_Bar_and_Restaurant for restaurants, and nobody on WP said boo to him/her/whatever.
I can't think of many other admins who have done such a good job of maintaining the secrecy of their real identity, while http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27899 Wikipedia's broken and corrupt administration system. Jayjg is the only other one who has pulled that off for any substantial length of time.
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Sun 26th December 2010, 12:41pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 3:15pm)
Here are the categories for nomination:
WP:DICK of Distinction -- for all-around rottenness by an admin
The Tag-Team Event
Miss Incongeniality
and for the good guys...
the Straight Shooter award for honest admins
and the Cojones de latón, for the non-admin who has distinguished himself in combat with the cabal
I know he doesn't fit into any categories, but Baseball Bugs has to be one of the most worthless, irritating drama whores in existence.
BASEBALL BUGS..that guy is a real loser!!!
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 7:09pm)
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:59am)
I would nominate Victim of Censorship for cojones, but is there a requirement for a 'fixed abode' over there?
Vic, would you care to disclose your WP username?
I go by many names... but Joehazelton (T-C-L-K-R-D)
was one of my wikinames.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 5:35pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Sun 26th December 2010, 3:26pm)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 4:14pm)
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
Pinning that C.F. on the Commons admins and stewards as a class? I call BS.
Please read before responding.
I specified those who abused their ops. There were many - those who wheel warred in deletions, blocking those who complained, blocking those who merely pointed out that allowing pedophiles to run rampant was a problem, etc.
Hell, one admin even replaced the main page with a cuss filled rant against Jimbo for daring to remove the excessive porn. If you think that is acceptable behavior, then you can refer to such mentality as exactly why you were removed from being a Steward.
You said "all". That can be parsed one of two ways and I guess you parsed it one, and I the other.
As for replacing the main page with a cuss filled rant, of course that's not acceptable behavior.
If you want to pursue this further I suggest a separate thread.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
Be glad I just realized Rjd0060 and Rd232 are spelled differently. Otherwise I'd feel compelled to nominate the previously conflated person(s) for top honors.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 27th December 2010, 1:15am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 5:35pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Sun 26th December 2010, 3:26pm)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 26th December 2010, 4:14pm)
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
Pinning that C.F. on the Commons admins and stewards as a class? I call BS.
Please read before responding.
I specified those who abused their ops. There were many - those who wheel warred in deletions, blocking those who complained, blocking those who merely pointed out that allowing pedophiles to run rampant was a problem, etc.
Hell, one admin even replaced the main page with a cuss filled rant against Jimbo for daring to remove the excessive porn. If you think that is acceptable behavior, then you can refer to such mentality as exactly why you were removed from being a Steward.
You said "all". That can be parsed one of two ways and I guess you parsed it one, and I the other.
As for replacing the main page with a cuss filled rant, of course that's not acceptable behavior.
If you want to pursue this further I suggest a separate thread.
"all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who"
There is only one way to parse it.
This is the appropriate place to bring up such things and you know it, so stop trollng.
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable. Even in his castrated state he is still the same outrageous prick. I think he should be next to Gmaxwell and the others.
Posted by: thekohser
Nihiltres and Joseph Reagle each deserve some sort of nomination for "off-Wikipedia Kool-Aid stirring".
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 1:00am)
I think that manic WikiLawyers, Porn Protectors, and Knob Polishers can all be subsumed under the general DICK category.
And the recently discovered category of bottom-wipers?
QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 27th December 2010, 3:12pm)
Nihiltres and Joseph Reagle each deserve some sort of nomination for "off-Wikipedia Kool-Aid stirring".
I was just about to nominate Reagle, and there you were. Seconded.
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:56am)
Furthermore, I absolutely think Cirt should be put up for the DICK award.
Seconded
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:10pm)
I'd feel better if certain people were excluded from winning multiple awards.
I can see your point, but it's important to remember that we are competing with the Oscars, the Tonys, the Emmys, and the Grammys. There is no tradition at those pageants that forbids a strong contestant from winning year after year. Plus, we have many new members of the academy here who have not yet exercised their franchise. If they want the exquisite thrill of casting a vote for David Gerard, I don't want to stand in their way.
On the other hand, it would be disappointing if the thing got too monotonous. For example, are Cla68 and Giano the only rank-and-file Wikipedians who possess any Cojones? If this were the year he ran for ArbCom, I would nominate the Fat Man, but his latest activity is mainly just rambunctious.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:00am)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable.
Which list?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:59am)
I would nominate Victim of Censorship for cojones, but is there a requirement for a 'fixed abode' over there?
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Sun 26th December 2010, 9:15pm)
I go by many names... but Joehazelton (T-C-L-K-R-D)
was one of my wikinames.
OK, Peter, do you want to nominate Joehazelton? It should be based on on-Wiki activity, of course, not based on Vic's sweet and sentimental essays here at the Review.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:25am)
And the recently discovered category of bottom-wipers?
QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 27th December 2010, 3:12pm)
Nihiltres and Joseph Reagle each deserve some sort of nomination for "off-Wikipedia Kool-Aid stirring".
I was just about to nominate Reagle, and there you were. Seconded.
Those guys are our competition in the criticism biz, although of course, we wield the Sword of Righteousness, whereas they brandish the Lips and Tongue of Obsequiousness.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 8:00pm)
I think that manic WikiLawyers, Porn Protectors, and Knob Polishers can all be subsumed under the general DICK category. I don't want to make things too elaborate, and plus the construction of the actual voting poll is extremely labor-intensive as it is.
Perhaps there should just be a second thread for TWOT of distinction with lots more categories.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:43am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:00am)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable.
Which list?
Miss Incongeniality seems about right. That is where all the people trying to justify the porn or defend those who abused their ops to defend it belong. Add Gmaxwell, Thogo, Shoemaker's Holiday, Kameraad Pjotr, Mercy, Abigor, Mattbuck, etc.
Or you could just list all the Commons porno fiends as one big tag team, as they did take over the Commons IRC channel to organize their offense.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 3:00pm)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable. Even in his castrated state he is still the same outrageous prick. I think he should be next to Gmaxwell and the others.
Hey now, Greg doesn't deserve all that.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:40am)
For example, are Cla68 and Giano the only rank-and-file Wikipedians who possess any Cojones?
As a matter of fact...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Malleus_Fatuorum has made a Wiki career of stepping on the right toes. He deserves praise.
A real under-the-radar type is the Australian editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Johnfos, who fights a good fight on renewable energy issues.
For the other categories:
Dick of Distinction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TenPoundHammer (you don't need to ask why).
Tag-Team: Risker and Rlvese, due primarily to Risker's slimy block of an IP editor that called attention to Rlvese's plagiarism.
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:51pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:40am)
For example, are Cla68 and Giano the only rank-and-file Wikipedians who possess any Cojones?
As a matter of fact...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Malleus_Fatuorum has made a Wiki career of stepping on the right toes. He deserves praise.
A real under-the-radar type is the Australian editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Johnfos, who fights a good fight on renewable energy issues.
For the other categories:
Dick of Distinction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TenPoundHammer (you don't need to ask why).
Tag-Team: Risker and Rlvese, due primarily to Risker's slimy block of an IP editor that called attention to Rlvese's plagiarism.
Agree with all of these (esp. the slimy part). Except Ten pound hammer. who he?
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:13pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:43am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:00am)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable.
Which list?
Miss Incongeniality seems about right. That is where all the people trying to justify the porn or defend those who abused their ops to defend it belong. Add Gmaxwell, Thogo, Shoemaker's Holiday, Kameraad Pjotr, Mercy, Abigor, Mattbuck, etc.
Or you could just list all the Commons porno fiends as one big tag team, as they did take over the Commons IRC channel to organize their offense.
You really just don't give up, do you?
I'm happy to be nominated for Miss I as long as you are too. Bet you get more votes.
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 27th December 2010, 11:34am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:13pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:43am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:00am)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable.
Which list?
Miss Incongeniality seems about right. That is where all the people trying to justify the porn or defend those who abused their ops to defend it belong. Add Gmaxwell, Thogo, Shoemaker's Holiday, Kameraad Pjotr, Mercy, Abigor, Mattbuck, etc.
Or you could just list all the Commons porno fiends as one big tag team, as they did take over the Commons IRC channel to organize their offense.
You really just don't give up, do you?
I'm happy to be nominated for Miss I as long as you are too. Bet you get more votes.
I would like to have a category of "Wikipediot of Distinction" and have your name placed nominated for that very special award. That award would be a gold plated turd.
QUOTE(Lar @ Sun 26th December 2010, 9:59am)
As in past years, once the poll is set up, please make sure that voters can abstain in some categories. My votes will only be for the good guys.
Obvious nom for Cojones, as in past years, is Cla68.
Obvious nom for Straight Shooter, as in past years, is Doc Glasgow/Scott Macdonald.
(from 30,000 feet... thank you Google for free wireless)
I usually vote for all the bad guys.
My hope is you get nominated for on of the spots I can vote for.
Just for the sake of completeness, I think Lar should be listed in the "dick of distinction" contest.
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:48pm)
Just for the sake of completeness, I think Lar should be listed in the "dick of distinction" contest.
Seconded. There were people at school who sat at the front and were good, and those who sat at the back and arsed around. And there were those who hung around with the people at the back, but actually sat at the front. Lar.
Posted by: Infomercial
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th December 2010, 1:03pm)
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:48pm)
Just for the sake of completeness, I think Lar should be listed in the "dick of distinction" contest.
Seconded. There were people at school who sat at the front and were good, and those who sat at the back and arsed around. And there were those who hung around with the people at the back, but actually sat at the front. Lar.
Thirded. (Can I do that?) I'm sorry, man. You're just a serious dick.
Posted by: TungstenCarbide
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:13pm)
... Or you could just list all the Commons porno fiends as one big tag team, as they did take over the Commons IRC channel to organize their offense.
I'll second this.
"For their tireless crusade to protect porn on commons, regardless of its educational value ... "
A good place to start would be the admins who collectively http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Jimbo+Wales&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= that Jimbo deleted. Someone else has to fill in the names (Ottava?) as I have no desire to dig through the logs.
Posted by: The Adversary
Ah, Last year it was so easy: I gave all my votes to Mike Godwin, for his "work" in the Gerard affair (=Extremely disgraceful; coming from someone so high in the pecking order. I always demand more of the people at the top! )
This year; dunno. I have hardly been back for about 1/2 a year....but some admins/editors over at Commons surely qualify for the awards? Or perhaps then it should be renamed the "WP: A BILLIONDICKS of ALLDifferent Colors and Sizes"-award?
<edit>
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Mon 27th December 2010, 8:39pm)
A good place to start would be the admins who collectively http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Jimbo+Wales&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= that Jimbo deleted. ..
Sounds good.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Infomercial @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:22am)
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th December 2010, 1:03pm)
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:48pm)
Just for the sake of completeness, I think Lar should be listed in the "dick of distinction" contest.
Seconded. There were people at school who sat at the front and were good, and those who sat at the back and arsed around. And there were those who hung around with the people at the back, but actually sat at the front. Lar.
Thirded. (Can I do that?) I'm sorry, man. You're just a serious dick.
Oh yeah, this is a great way to make the DICK awards really mean something and have weight.
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter. And if we wish to be "inclusive", Ottava deserves the same.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Tag team nominees: Chase Me Ladies, I'm the Cavalry and Panyd. How can anyone forget Panyd's bizarre RfA from earlier this year, when her sailor boy claimed that he "accidentally" edited on her laptop when they were engaged in a romantic rendezvous?
(By the way...is http://twitter.com/#!/panyd Chase Me's gal?)
Straight Shooter: Paul Erik is a nice guy admin - why not give him some praise?
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:40pm)
Tag team nominees: Chase Me Ladies, I'm the Cavalry and Panyd. How can anyone forget Panyd's bizarre RfA from earlier this year, when her sailor boy claimed that he "accidentally" edited on her laptop when they were engaged in a romantic rendezvous? Straight Shooter: Paul Erik is a nice guy admin - why not give him some praise?
second
QUOTE
(By the way...is http://twitter.com/#!/panyd Chase Me's gal?)
Eek! Shame on you!.... Damn--her followers list is full of spammers, iPhone devels, and assorted junk Twitter users........ I would say, she's probably Panyd (T-C-L-K-R-D)
. Jimbo is also in the friends list. Plus: she's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Panyd as having a connection to Sarah Lawrence, and the Twitter user has some Sarah Lawrence links. Plus: http://twitter.com/#!/TheCavalry.
I'll say it again: if these WP admins are so damned smart, why do they pretend to hide their real identities on WP, but slobber all over the social-media sites with their egos?
(PS: her http://panyd.deviantart.com/.)
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:38pm)
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter. And if we wish to be "inclusive", Ottava deserves the same.
Sure, why not. Put us both in for both. Plus Miss Incongeniality.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:38pm)
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter.
My sentiments exactly. Our policy is that we will accept any nomination, no matter how far-fetched, so Lar goes in for DICK. But I nominate him for Straight Shooter on the basis of his clash with IronDuck, and also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&oldid=404469837#The_ArbCom_sets_policy.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 27th December 2010, 9:34am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:13pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:43am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 27th December 2010, 7:00am)
Herschelkrustofsky, please add Lar to the list for being a complete douche who is trying to defend the undefendable.
Which list?
Miss Incongeniality seems about right.
You really just don't give up, do you? I'm happy to be nominated for Miss I as long as you are too. Bet you get more votes.
This ought to be interesting. Should I consider this to be a formal nomination for the both of them?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:17pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:38pm)
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter. And if we wish to be "inclusive", Ottava deserves the same.
Sure, why not. Put us both in for both. Plus Miss Incongeniality.
Ottava's ineligible for DICK -- not an admin. Miss Incongeniality it is.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:30pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:17pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:38pm)
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter. And if we wish to be "inclusive", Ottava deserves the same.
Sure, why not. Put us both in for both. Plus Miss Incongeniality.
Ottava's ineligible for DICK -- not an admin. Miss Incongeniality it is.
But what exactly would I go in under? All I did this year was criticize those for porn, complain about blatant WMF nonsense to Sue, and put up with Abd at Wikiversity. I complained about being banned, though. Does that count? ;/
Posted by: lilburne
Although Bugs has more posts to ANI than the next 3 combined, bugs isn't an admin either.
Besides as with yobs and ASBOs he'd probablt take it as a badge of honour.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(lilburne @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:40pm)
Although Bugs has more posts to ANI than the next 3 combined, bugs isn't an admin either.
D'oh. Hyperactive rank-and-file Wikipediots are a dime a dozen.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:42pm)
QUOTE(lilburne @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:40pm)
Although Bugs has more posts to ANI than the next 3 combined, bugs isn't an admin either.
D'oh. Hyperactive rank-and-file Wikipediots are a dime a dozen.
Neither is TenPoundHammer -- I didn't realize the dick award was only for admins. My bad. Put him and Bugs in Miss Incongeniality instead, please.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:18pm)
and also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&oldid=404469837#The_ArbCom_sets_policy.
That also brings up Will Beback. He's been extra-shrieky lately. Deserves something for his "efforts".
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:56pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:42pm)
QUOTE(lilburne @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:40pm)
Although Bugs has more posts to ANI than the next 3 combined, bugs isn't an admin either.
D'oh. Hyperactive rank-and-file Wikipediots are a dime a dozen.
Neither is TenPoundHammer -- I didn't realize the dick award was only for admins. My bad. Put him and Bugs in Miss Incongeniality instead, please.
Done.
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 3:07pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:18pm)
and also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&oldid=404469837#The_ArbCom_sets_policy.
That also brings up Will Beback. He's been extra-shrieky lately. Deserves something for his "efforts".
I agree. He's been up for WP:DICK multiple times, and never really made the grade. He just doesn't have the panache of David Gerard.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(The Adversary @ Mon 27th December 2010, 8:09pm)
This year; dunno. I have hardly been back for about 1/2 a year....but some admins/editors over at Commons surely qualify for the awards? Or perhaps then it should be renamed the "WP: A BILLIONDICKS of ALLDifferent Colors andSizes"-award?
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 2:38pm)
QUOTE(Infomercial @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:22am)
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th December 2010, 1:03pm)
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 27th December 2010, 5:48pm)
Just for the sake of completeness, I think Lar should be listed in the "dick of distinction" contest.
Seconded. There were people at school who sat at the front and were good, and those who sat at the back and arsed around. And there were those who hung around with the people at the back, but actually sat at the front. Lar.
Thirded. (Can I do that?) I'm sorry, man. You're just a serious dick.
Oh yeah, this is a great way to make the DICK awards really mean something and have weight.
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter. And if we wish to be "inclusive", Ottava deserves the same.
Don't think Lar's a straight Arrow...more like a corkscrew.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:18pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 27th December 2010, 12:38pm)
If Lar deserves to be put in as a candidate, he should nommed both for DICK and for Straight Shooter.
My sentiments exactly. Our policy is that we will accept any nomination, no matter how far-fetched, so Lar goes in for DICK. But I nominate him for Straight Shooter on the basis of his clash with IronDuck, and also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar&oldid=404469837#The_ArbCom_sets_policy.
It's good for the people to decide... is lar a dick or a straight shooter..
Myself... he's just an enabler to evil.
Posted by: RMHED
My nom for Dick of Distinction is DGG for his tireless inclusionist agenda. He always seems to find a way to make the stupidest opinions sound vaguely http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=404105814.
As long as users like DGG flourish on Wikipedia then the BLP problem will never be resolved.
My Tag Team nom is Malleus Fatuorum and Parrot of Doom who are almost constantly backing each other up on their respective talk pages. Parrot is the sidekick, no matter what Malleus does Parrot will leap to his defence.
My Tag Team nom is Malleus Fatuorum and Parrot of Doom who are almost constantly backing each other up on their respective talk pages. Parrot is the sidekick, no matter what Malleus does Parrot will leap to his defence.
That would make for a rather one-sided tag team wouldn't it?
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 27th December 2010, 4:51pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:40am)
For example, are Cla68 and Giano the only rank-and-file Wikipedians who possess any Cojones?
As a matter of fact...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Malleus_Fatuorum has made a Wiki career of stepping on the right toes. He deserves praise.
A real under-the-radar type is the Australian editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Johnfos, who fights a good fight on renewable energy issues.
I don't even know what "Cojones de latón" means. Balls of a latex-like material?
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 27th December 2010, 9:38pm)
I don't even know what "Cojones de latón" means. Balls of a latex-like material?
"Latón" means brass, sonny.
Hersh, the list looks okay to me--at least 4 nominees for each award. (If you can call these things "awards". Hah.)
(However, it's Glasgow, not "Glascow". Sorry.)
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 27th December 2010, 10:35pm)
That is a fine collection. Can anyone enlighten me about Coffee and Smashville, however? Never come across them.
Good idea about DGG. "always seems to find a way to make the stupidest opinions sound vaguely reasonable. "
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Tue 28th December 2010, 4:28am)
Good idea about DGG. "always seems to find a way to make the stupidest opinions sound vaguely reasonable. "
Good call, indeed.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 1:05am)
Hersh, the list looks okay to me--at least 4 nominees for each award. (If you can call these things "awards". Hah.)
(However, it's Glasgow, not "Glascow". Sorry.)
D'oh. It's fixed now.
I'm actually allowing a month or so for the nomination process, to give everyone a chance to seek recognition for his favorite contestants. The actual voting will commence at the end of January, and the awards ceremony will take place around one week before the Oscars -- we're stealing their thunder.
Posted by: Malleus
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 9:05am)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 27th December 2010, 9:38pm)
I don't even know what "Cojones de latón" means. Balls of a latex-like material?
"Latón" means brass, sonny.
Thanks Dad.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 28th December 2010, 11:56am)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 1:05am)
Hersh, the list looks okay to me--at least 4 nominees for each award. (If you can call these things "awards". Hah.)
(However, it's Glasgow, not "Glascow". Sorry.)
D'oh. It's fixed now.
I'm actually allowing a month or so for the nomination process, to give everyone a chance to seek recognition for his favorite contestants. The actual voting will commence at the end of January, and the awards ceremony will take place around one week before the Oscars -- we're stealing their thunder.
I expect you'll be hearing from their solicitors just like last year...
Posted by: TungstenCarbide
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 28th December 2010, 7:19pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 9:05am)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 27th December 2010, 9:38pm)
I don't even know what "Cojones de latón" means. Balls of a latex-like material?
"Latón" means brass, sonny.
Thanks Dad.
I think you meant 'Grandpa'.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:55pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 28th December 2010, 7:19pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 9:05am)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 27th December 2010, 9:38pm)
I don't even know what "Cojones de latón" means. Balls of a latex-like material?
"Latón" means brass, sonny.
Thanks Dad.
I think you meant 'Grandpa'.
Or possibly "abuelo."
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 28th December 2010, 6:06am)
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Tue 28th December 2010, 4:28am)
Good idea about DGG. "always seems to find a way to make the stupidest opinions sound vaguely reasonable. "
Good call, indeed.
The business with SqueakBox being accused of paid editing will be a good test case, since SqueakBox is one of Jimbo's biggest fanbois and a major "groomer" of Jimbo's talkpage.
If DGG fails to follow up, and lets SqueakBox keep editing (after openly http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SqueakBox&diff=404409671&oldid=404381720 to block him), you will then have clear evidence that DGG is a fool.
Posted by: Alison
Can we please add Cyclopia into the running, for his rabid inclusionism? Oh, and Colonel Warden for same? Nice to see that DGG already made the cut
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Alison @ Tue 28th December 2010, 2:23pm)
Can we please add Cyclopia into the running, for his rabid inclusionism? Oh, and Colonel Warden for same?
I'll assume that you mean for DICK, Correct me if I'm mistaken.
Heh - Cyclopia - not poor CyclopEDia - dunno who that is
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Righty-O. From Cyclopia's userpage:
QUOTE
My name is not "Cyclopedia", but Cyclopia. Don't know why so many people misspell it.
Posted by: RMHED
QUOTE(Alison @ Tue 28th December 2010, 10:23pm)
Can we please add Cyclopia into the running, for his rabid inclusionism? Oh, and Colonel Warden for same? Nice to see that DGG already made the cut
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:13pm)
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
He has a point. I'd create a special category for douches who aren't admins, but who generate annoying buzzing sounds on AN/I routinely. Failing that, Miss Incongenality.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:22pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:13pm)
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
He has a point. I'd create a special category for douches who aren't admins, but who generate annoying buzzing sounds on AN/I routinely. Failing that, Miss Incongenality.
Oops. OK, for now, Miss Incongeniality.
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Alison @ Tue 28th December 2010, 4:45pm)
Heh - Cyclopia - not poor CyclopEDia - dunno who that is
Add all the admins, let us sort them out.
Posted by: JayT
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 11:22pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:13pm)
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
He has a point. I'd create a special category for douches who aren't admins, but who generate annoying buzzing sounds on AN/I routinely. Failing that, Miss Incongenality.
I second (third, maybe?) a category for distinguished dicks who aren't admins. The minor league dick? Captain of the farm team?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(JayT @ Tue 28th December 2010, 5:17pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 11:22pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:13pm)
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
He has a point. I'd create a special category for douches who aren't admins, but who generate annoying buzzing sounds on AN/I routinely. Failing that, Miss Incongenality.
I second (third, maybe?) a category for distinguished dicks who aren't admins. The minor league dick? Captain of the farm team?
The field would be too large. What makes Wikipedia different from USENET is that Wikipedia actually promotes people for being dicks. But I think perhaps it is time to have a Wikilawyering event. We could call it the Vexatious Litigant award, or perhaps someone has another suggestion?
Posted by: Kato
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 4:16pm)
I agree entirely with your nomination of the artist formerly known as Doc glasgow (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, for his ground-breaking role in confronting the BLP marauders.
In the WP:DICK category, I would like to nominate Georgewilliamherbert (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who has long gone unrecognized as a versatile and devious hitman in the service of numerous POV-pushing rouge admins. Tiptoety is also a good call.
Long unnoticed? I've been promoting his work for years. Do a site search.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 28th December 2010, 5:40pm)
Looks about right. Of course, there are others but those seem to be the most prominent/powerful of the group that crossed over onto IRC also.
You might want to add "et al" to the end for good measures haha. Instead of "tag team" perhaps have "gang rape". ;/
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:22pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 28th December 2010, 3:13pm)
Cyclopia and Colonel Warden are not admins I believe, can't think why though as they seem eminently qualified.
He has a point. I'd create a special category for douches who aren't admins, but who generate annoying buzzing sounds on AN/I routinely. Failing that, Miss Incongenality.
Well as far as http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents, Baseball Bugs is more than 5,000 edits ahead of the next non-admin.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(gomi @ Sun 26th December 2010, 10:30am)
I would like to propose a new award category, if anyone is interested: Most Vexatious Litigant in an ArbCom Fiasco.
I think we can drop the ArbCom part, so as to embrace AN/I, RfCs, and the rest of the alphabet soup. I'll move Bugs and the others into this new category.
Did you hear about the Japanese guy and the Jewish guy who formed a partnership and opened a Sushi joint? It's called Sosumi.
I wold like to nominate DocJames (User:Jmh649 - not to be confused with the actual User:Docjames) for a special award for his ability to juggle the demands of being a WP editor and admin while still holding down a job as an emergency room doctor. I think a small plaque would be appropriate. Emergency room patrons could admire it while awaiting treatment. Perhaps they could look their particular ailments up on WP and treat themselves?
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 29th December 2010, 11:00am)
I wold like to nominate DocJames (User:Jmh649 - not to be confused with the actual User:Docjames) for a special award for his ability to juggle the demands of being a WP editor and admin while still holding down a job as an emergency room doctor. I think a small plaque would be appropriate. Emergency room patrons could admire it while awaiting treatment. Perhaps they could look their particular ailments up on WP and treat themselves?
With Doc James on the job, I'd suggest giving the patients copies of Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 10:40am)
Did you hear about the Japanese guy and the Jewish guy who formed a partnership and opened a Sushi joint? It's called Sosumi.
I heard that they're also making a new movie called "Torah! Torah! Torah!"
Posted by: thekohser
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 10:40am)
Did you hear about the Japanese guy and the Jewish guy who formed a partnership and opened a Sushi joint? It's called Sosumi.
Did you hear about the Japanese guy who loved Laugh-In who opened a sushi joint? It's http://www.saketumirestaurant.com/Site/Directions.html.
Posted by: Infomercial
I'm a it confused here, though. What's the difference between a DICK of Distinction and Miss Incongeniality? I don't want to nominate someone for the wrong thing.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
To be a DICK of Distinction, the nominee must be an admin. The competition includes all the admin-y things, such as abuse of admin powers to push POV (a perennial favorite.)
Miss Incongeniality is open to all comers, and focuses on egregious violations of civilized conduct, including but not limited to WP:CIVIL.
Posted by: Lar
I'm tempted to nominate myself for Vexatious Litigant just so I can nail the meta-award for most categories nominated, for but naa....
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Wed 29th December 2010, 1:59pm)
I'm tempted to nominate myself for Vexatious Litigant just so I can nail the meta-award for most categories nominated, for but naa....
You're already up for the trifecta.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 6:00pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Wed 29th December 2010, 1:59pm)
I'm tempted to nominate myself for Vexatious Litigant just so I can nail the meta-award for most categories nominated, for but naa....
You're already up for the trifecta.
Nothing succeeds like excess though.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 29th December 2010, 9:05am)
Did you hear about the Japanese guy who loved Laugh-In who opened a sushi joint? It's http://www.saketumirestaurant.com/Site/Directions.html.
You're here, snarking it up......meanwhile, Wikipedia Review is down......
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 5:00pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Wed 29th December 2010, 1:59pm)
I'm tempted to nominate myself for Vexatious Litigant just so I can nail the meta-award for most categories nominated, for but naa....
You're already up for the trifecta.
I will nominate Lar for that category. We of the equine brotherhood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecta
Posted by: thekohser
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 29th December 2010, 5:10pm)
You're here, snarking it up......meanwhile, Wikipedia Review is down......
Wikipedia Review is down for a reason, you know. It's all part of our plan, laid out for us by Bridgespan / Q2 Consulting.
Posted by: Infomercial
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 29th December 2010, 8:40pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 29th December 2010, 5:10pm)
You're here, snarking it up......meanwhile, Wikipedia Review is down......
Wikipedia Review is down for a reason, you know. It's all part of our plan, laid out for us by Bridgespan / Q2 Consulting.
You think 7 people would have read that? Talk about insecure.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 29th December 2010, 11:00am)
I wold like to nominate DocJames (User:Jmh649 - not to be confused with the actual User:Docjames) for a special award for his ability to juggle the demands of being a WP editor and admin while still holding down a job as an emergency room doctor.
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 29th December 2010, 2:13pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 5:00pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Wed 29th December 2010, 1:59pm)
I'm tempted to nominate myself for Vexatious Litigant just so I can nail the meta-award for most categories nominated, for but naa....
You're already up for the trifecta.
I will nominate Lar for that category. We of the equine brotherhood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfecta
I'm not really certain as to whether this is a serious nomination. Has Lar actually litigated vexatiously?
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 29th December 2010, 5:00pm)
I'm not really certain as to whether this is a serious nomination. Has Lar actually litigated vexatiously?
Only if he drinks his prune juice.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Oh, for Ms. Incongeniality: Dr. Blofeld has become a tiresome bore with his temper-heavy retirements and his casual return to Wiki-obsessions. It could be overlooked if he was contributing something of value, rather than overloading the site with hundreds of stubs about every village in sub-Saharan Africa.
Posted by: Milton Roe
For his comment to Kohs on WikiSource, I think Wikisource admin Inductiveload a.k.a. InDiaperLoad deserves some research for Miss Incongeniality.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Also for DICK: OrangeMike, the original Annoying Orange!
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 30th December 2010, 8:22pm)
Also for DICK: OrangeMike, the original Annoying Orange!
Seconded. Eric has mentioned User:Ronz. Who is he? Any enemy of Eric's is an enemy of mine.
Posted by: carbuncle
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 30th December 2010, 4:25pm)
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 29th December 2010, 11:00am)
I wold like to nominate DocJames (User:Jmh649 - not to be confused with the actual User:Docjames) for a special award for his ability to juggle the demands of being a WP editor and admin while still holding down a job as an emergency room doctor.
Should I consider this a nomination for WP:DICK?
No, he doesn't rise to the level of a dick of "distinction".
Posted by: Cla68
I'm surprised no one has nominated ScienceApologist/Joshua P. Schroeder for Miss Incongeniality. I know no other WP editor who more deserves the title of all-around Jackass than that guy. How does he ever expect to get a job with what comes up when you Google his name?
Do you remember the stories about when the "Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince" book came out, that some kids would yell "Dumbledore dies!" at the other kids waiting in line to buy the book, ruining the surprise for them? There are very few WP editors who I think are big enough jerks to act that way. I don't think Will BeBack or William M. Connolley would do something like that. ScienceApologist, however, based on what I've seen, is capable of acting that way.
Posted by: EricBarbour
This is why I think the DICK award is a bit, um, redundant.
There are so many dicks on wiki, you can't really single one out for special opprobrium. Look further into AN/I or SPI or a few other areas, and you'll find one dick after another. 3RR is a daily magical giant dickfest.
How does one judge them all, except by recent well-known atrocities? That's how the DICK award was always done in the past, and it's obviously the only possible way. Otherwise you'll be handing out Special Achievement awards by the armload.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 30th December 2010, 5:17pm)
I'm surprised no one has nominated ScienceApologist/Joshua P. Schroeder for Miss Incongeniality. I know no other WP editor who more deserves the title of all-around Jackass than that guy. How does he ever expect to get a job with what comes up when you Google his name?
Do you remember the stories about when the "Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince" book came out, that some kids would yell "Dumbledore dies!" at the other kids waiting in line to buy the book, ruining the surprise for them? There are very few WP editors who I think are big enough jerks to act that way. I don't think Will BeBack or William M. Connolley would do something like that. ScienceApologist, however, based on what I've seen, is capable of acting that way.
Sounds like a keeper, although I found myself oddly unmoved by the Harry Potter Spoiler analogy. ScienceApologist has been getting very good buzz around the Academy for some time now.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 31st December 2010, 6:33am)
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 30th December 2010, 5:17pm)
I'm surprised no one has nominated ScienceApologist/Joshua P. Schroeder for Miss Incongeniality. I know no other WP editor who more deserves the title of all-around Jackass than that guy. How does he ever expect to get a job with what comes up when you Google his name?
Do you remember the stories about when the "Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince" book came out, that some kids would yell "Dumbledore dies!" at the other kids waiting in line to buy the book, ruining the surprise for them? There are very few WP editors who I think are big enough jerks to act that way. I don't think Will BeBack or William M. Connolley would do something like that. ScienceApologist, however, based on what I've seen, is capable of acting that way.
Sounds like a keeper, although I found myself oddly unmoved by the Harry Potter Spoiler analogy. ScienceApologist has been getting very good buzz around the Academy for some time now.
I don't think there is really any Wikipedian that deserves it this year.
Instead, can we give it to all of the Commons admin and the Stewards who abused their ops to try and keep the excessive porn?
I think they deserve it for their extreme political ideology, their jeopardizing any credibility the WMF may have, and for being just overall dirt bags who will say whatever to defend stolen porn images possibly of children while simultaneously accusing Google of being evil for taking pictures of their homes without permission.
I add my vote to Otava's.
Most group members here seem to have little or no experience on Commons, and so may find it hard to believe that many Commons administrators are worse than WP. Incredible, but I think that is true. Certainly, the behavior of many Commons administrators during the controversy over their abundant porn files was particularly deplorable and deserves recognition.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Kwork @ Fri 31st December 2010, 6:27am)
Certainly, the behavior of many Commons administrators during the controversy over their abundant porn files was particularly deplorable and deserves recognition.
The group presently listed as the "Porn Protection Cabal" -- is that comprised of Commons admins?
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 31st December 2010, 11:42am)
QUOTE(Kwork @ Fri 31st December 2010, 6:27am)
Certainly, the behavior of many Commons administrators during the controversy over their abundant porn files was particularly deplorable and deserves recognition.
The group presently listed as the "Porn Protection Cabal" -- is that comprised of Commons admins?
Pretty much. Most if not all are at least somewhat active on WP too.
Pains me to admit it but I agree with Kwork about some of the admins (and "freedom" trumps everything regular users)... It's like they don't get why posting a pic of a possible minor that likely didn't consent is so ... unreasonable. I despair. I mean really, get the proof of age and the permission recorded and it's all good. Is that so much to ask?
Posted by: Lar
Apparently I am notorious as a WR user, as I get proxy and assistance requests all the time. Go figure.
Anyway, I have received an anonymous request to submit the following names for the Tag-team Event
QUOTE
William M. Connelley, Kim Dabelstein Petersen, Dave Souza, Stephan Schulz, and Science Apologist
The requester commented
QUOTE
The climate cabal (or at least some of the more vexatious members of that group) really need to be nominated
... and added
QUOTE
SBHB and a couple of the others (like Polargeo) aren't insane and generally don't edit war, so I'd leave them out of the nomination, but the core should get some sort of recognition for their efforts.
Submitted without further comment.
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
I think William Connolley deserves another shot at the DICK award, too. This was a big year for him.
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Sun 2nd January 2011, 7:31pm)
I think William Connolley deserves another shot at the DICK award, too. This was a big year for him.
Is the admin requirement being waived? Or is ex sufficient?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Sun 2nd January 2011, 7:00pm)
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Sun 2nd January 2011, 7:31pm)
I think William Connolley deserves another shot at the DICK award, too. This was a big year for him.
Is the admin requirement being waived? Or is ex sufficient?
Recently defrocked admins are acceptable nominees, according to last year's decision by the Program and Catering Committee. Often, their defrocking is linked to a particular stellar role they have played.
I think I shall refrain from participating in the other categories, if you don't mind.
Seconded. While we're at it, The Wordsmith comes to mind as well, for BLPs and for his actions relating to CC. Ditto for LHvU regarding CC. They both took a lot of abuse but tried hard to do the right thing.
Posted by: Detective
This chap Ottava is arguing with. Should he be regarded as a dick or a straight shooter?
Posted by: Doc glasgow
QUOTE(Detective @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 6:12pm)
This chap Ottava is arguing with. Should he be regarded as a dick or a straight shooter?
Anyone who argues with Ottava for more than three minutes is, by definition, a dick.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 2:19pm)
QUOTE(Detective @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 6:12pm)
This chap Ottava is arguing with. Should he be regarded as a dick or a straight shooter?
Anyone who argues with Ottava for more than three minutes is, by definition, a dick.
Oh oh. But it's so addictive. Kinda like banging your head against a wall. Especially when you stop.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 10:03am)
While we're at it, The Wordsmith comes to mind as well, for BLPs and for his actions relating to CC. Ditto for LHvU regarding CC.
I'm going to assume you mean LessHeard vanU. Please correct me if I jump to conclusions here.
For tag team, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jrtayloriv and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:The_Four_Deuces. These two editors help each other in promoting a left-wing POV across numerous articles in Wikipedia. Jrtayloriv was the one trying to own the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state_terrorism about which I started a WR thread http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=31889. There's nothing necessarily wrong, of course, with having left-wing views, just wrong to try to promote them using Wikipedia.
Posted by: RMHED
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 11:45pm)
There's nothing necessarily wrong, of course, with having left-wing views, just wrong to try to promote them using Wikipedia.
Why?
Posted by: NuclearWarfare
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 9:47pm)
I'm frankly concerned that our good friend NewYorkBrad (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not represented in any of the nominations. Straight shooter -- not so much. Cohones, no, that's not it either. What award category combines the illusion of good intentions, mixes it with tl;dr commentary, a lifer attitude to the Wik, and boils it all down into a complete lack of followthrough or (indeed) any meaningful accomplishment? Impotent Rage For the Machine? No, that's not it. Words fail me.
On a similar note, if my suggestion for the Forgotten but not Gone category had been taken up, I might nominate Alison (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who continues to enforce absurd Wiki-policy, then hangs out and kvetches about it.
No sense leaving the WR members out, lest we are accused of favoritism!
Posted by: Alison
QUOTE(gomi @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 7:49pm)
On a similar note, if my suggestion for the Forgotten but not Gone category had been taken up, I might nominate Alison (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who continues to enforce absurd Wiki-policy, then hangs out and kvetches about it.
No sense leaving the WR members out, lest we are accused of favoritism!
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Alison @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 11:11pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 7:49pm)
On a similar note, if my suggestion for the Forgotten but not Gone category had been taken up, I might nominate Alison (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, who continues to enforce absurd Wiki-policy, then hangs out and kvetches about it.
No sense leaving the WR members out, lest we are accused of favoritism!
Go back to ED.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(gomi @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 10:49pm)
I'm frankly concerned that our good friend NewYorkBrad (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not represented in any of the nominations. Straight shooter -- not so much. Cohones, no, that's not it either. What award category combines the illusion of good intentions, mixes it with tl;dr commentary, a lifer attitude to the Wik, and boils it all down into a complete lack of followthrough or (indeed) any meaningful accomplishment? Impotent Rage For the Machine? No, that's not it. Words fail me.
How about "Most Tedious" for those with the longest rambles on bureaucratic related matters?
Brad, FT2, Abd, etc.
And can LessHeardvanU be added to the dick nom, as always, since he kinda deserves it?
Posted by: Alison
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 8:38pm)
Go back to ED.
I've not been there in over a month but hey - rant on...
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(gomi @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 10:49pm)
I'm frankly concerned that our good friend NewYorkBrad (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not represented in any of the nominations. Straight shooter — not so much. Cohones, no, that's not it either. What award category combines the illusion of good intentions, mixes it with tl;dr commentary, a lifer attitude to the Wik, and boils it all down into a complete lack of followthrough or (indeed) any meaningful accomplishment? Impotent Rage For the Machine? No, that's not it. Words fail me.
“Waiting For God.win†(to step ↓)
Oh wait, an idyll whose time has come …
Jon
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 4th January 2011, 4:43am)
How about "Most Tedious" for those with the longest rambles on bureaucratic related matters?
Brad, FT2, Abd, etc.
Are those vexatious litigants?
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Alison @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 11:43pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 8:38pm)
Go back to ED.
I've not been there in over a month but hey - rant on...
Wow, a whole month.
Q: What do you call a guy who hasn't been on Stromfront for a month?
A: A racist.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:15am)
Stromfront
good one
Jon
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:36am)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:15am)
Stromfront
good one
Jon
Guess I didn't want to help the wee-ones http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/t/strom_thurmond/index.html there.
Posted by: dtobias
I nominate GlassBeadGame for Miss Incongeniality.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:48am)
I nominate GlassBeadGame for Miss Incongeniality.
Remember that the contestant must be evaluated for activity on-Wiki.
Posted by: Daniel Brandt
QUOTE(Alison @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 10:43pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 8:38pm)
Go back to ED.
I've not been there in over a month but hey - rant on...
I just read http://www.securitynewsdaily.com/wikileaks-hacktivists-not-so-anonymous-after-all-0383/, which mentions Encyclopedia Dramatica in the last sentence.
Here's my advice to you, Alison. As a sysop and checkuser on ED, you should go back and visit ED for the purpose of flushing http://encyclopediadramatica.com/LOIC down the drain, and make sure it stays flushed. If you get away with this, then flush the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aboriginal, as well as the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Steve_Hodder-Watt written to punish the Australian citizen who complained to the Australian authorities. Then resign your sysop and checkuser status at ED, flush your user page, and never go back.
You've come down on me for doxing an underage Wikipediot, but here ED is enticing EDiots to first commit one felony (DDoS with LOIC), and then commit a second felony (lying to the FBI). You are not being very protective of children by participating in ED. Even Martha Stewart knows better than to lie to the FBI (she did time for this). This is the worst possible advice ED could give the basement-dwellers who read ED.
ED's defense is that this "free speech" is protected because it's all satire. Such a defense might be reasonable if the readership is educated enough to recognize it as satire. In the case of ED, however, satire passes over into outright hate speech, simply because ED readers are uneducated, inexperienced in the real world, and irresponsible.
ED is an attractive nuisance for children and other stupid people, and has no right to exist.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 4th January 2011, 10:57am)
QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:48am)
I nominate GlassBeadGame for Miss Incongeniality.
Remember that the contestant must be evaluated for activity on-Wiki.
Awe come on H. You know Wikipedians pursue their revenge-fest across the internet and at times into homes and workplaces. You can't expect them to not to honor me just because I haven't touched their website even once over the past year.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:29pm)
You can't expect them to not to honor me just because I haven't touched their website even once over the past year.
{{citation needed}}
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:46pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:29pm)
You can't expect them to not to honor me just because I haven't touched their website even once over the past year.
{{citation needed}}
You need the "citation" and have no right to put any such burden on me or anyone else who doesn't use Wikipedia, ass-wipe. But I know you just can't see life without Wikipedia.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(gomi @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 10:49pm)
I'm frankly concerned that our good friend NewYorkBrad (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not represented in any of the nominations...No sense leaving the WR members out...
Brad's not one to leave his member out -- he always remembers to zip his fly!
If you want, I will nominate him for DICK of Distinction. Not that he did anything in the past year that was truly dickish. But I would think of it like Al Pacino getting the Oscar for "Scent of a Woman" -- not his best work, but a hat-tip for a lifetime's achievement.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:53pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:46pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:29pm)
You can't expect them to not to honor me just because I haven't touched their website even once over the past year.
{{citation needed}}
You need the "citation" and have no right to put any such burden on me or anyone else who doesn't use Wikipedia, ass-wipe. But I know you just can't see life without Wikipedia.
Such a charmer.
I merely point out that your claim not to edit is just that, a claim. My real identity is out there and yours isn't. Your choice, and I support it, but you don't get to make claims without acknowledging they are just that, claims, and nothing more. Normally I'd take your word for it but namecalling tends to reduce my credulity.
HTH, HAND.
Posted by: gomi
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 4th January 2011, 10:10am)
If you want, I will nominate him for DICK of Distinction. Not that he did anything in the past year that was truly dickish. But I would think of it like Al Pacino getting the Oscar for "Scent of a Woman" -- not his best work, but a hat-tip for a lifetime's achievement.
But back to the subject at hand, the problem is that Brad isn't generally a dick. He's just a tedious old fart hanging around for no apparent reason. He has a position of power which he uses to absolutely no effect whatsoever. He affects a patina of reasonableness (and for all I know, is actually reasonable), but accomplishes nothing. Brad on WP:BIO - zilch. Brad on Wikiporn - nada. Brad on "User:Malcolm Schosha" - zip. While someone on Wikipedia not using power for evil is a novelty, it isn't a very interesting one.
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr Dad. He's Inspector Clouseau (T-H-L-K-D), only not funny. Perhaps it's an occupational hazard for attorneys. Frank Bednarz (Cool Hand Luke (T-C-L-K-R-D)
) ought to be careful: JD + WP = Tedious impotence. There's no pill for that.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:23pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:53pm)
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:46pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:29pm)
You can't expect them to not to honor me just because I haven't touched their website even once over the past year.
{{citation needed}}
You need the "citation" and have no right to put any such burden on me or anyone else who doesn't use Wikipedia, ass-wipe. But I know you just can't see life without Wikipedia.
Such a charmer.
I merely point out that your claim not to edit is just that, a claim. My real identity is out there and yours isn't. Your choice, and I support it, but you don't get to make claims without acknowledging they are just that, claims, and nothing more. Normally I'd take your word for it but namecalling tends to reduce my credulity.
HTH, HAND.
Do you understand, asshole, that I am not asking for anything, not asserting that I am a worthy Wikipedian, do not wish to return, and am not prevented from doing so in any event except by my distaste for Wikipedia and Wikipedians? I don't need your ass-clown use of nerdy Wikipedian jargon that just screams "loser." The default condition, enjoyed by the vast majority of mankind, is "I don't edit," which requires no proof.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:49pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 4th January 2011, 10:10am)
If you want, I will nominate him for DICK of Distinction. Not that he did anything in the past year that was truly dickish. But I would think of it like Al Pacino getting the Oscar for "Scent of a Woman" -- not his best work, but a hat-tip for a lifetime's achievement.
See it - it gets better with age. The same cannot be said about Pacino's acting, though.
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 1:49pm)
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr. Dad.
Now, I take umbrage there. Alan Hale Sr. was one of the best scene stealers in movie history -- his Little John in "The Adventures of Robin Hood" was classic! Real movie lovers revere Hale Sr. -- Hale Jr. was no great shakes as an actor, however.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:49am)
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr. Dad.
Bzzt. Except I can think of of one memorable Hale, Sr. role without google or WP: he was Little John in the "original" (and still the best) 1939 Errol Flynn Robin Hood. In which he was perfect and basically defined that character forever (what there is of him), rather like Bela Lugosi and Dracula. Except whenever I see that film I have the uncanny feeling that any moment he's going to do the roll-eyes-open/close-mouth-open/close-hands thing of the skipper trying to keep himself from strangling Gilligan.
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun. There's a palomino horse in one scene in Robin Hood that looks very much like Roy Rogers' Trigger. And by golly, it is Trigger! And look! Scarlett O'Hara is being courted by a young Clark Kent with no glasses!
As for NYB, agree. On a scale of 10, his blandness goes to 12. Sorry, Lar.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 2:06pm)
As for NYB, agree. On a scale of 10, his blandness goes to 12. Sorry, Lar.
Bland or blech, my Brad nomination is serious - he shouldn't feel left out, so insert him vigorously into the mix!
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:07pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 2:06pm)
As for NYB, agree. On a scale of 10, his blandness goes to 12. Sorry, Lar.
Bland or blech, my Brad nomination is serious - he shouldn't feel left out, so insert him vigorously into the mix!
Okay. Anybody volunteer to insert him?
Posted by: Obesity
PLEASE ADD JAYRON32. HE WAS VERY MEAN TO ME AND SAID I COULD KEEP EDITING WIKIPEDIA IF I *NEVER* TALKED TO ANYONE ON THEIR TALK PAGE AND ONLY EDITED ARTICLES.
Posted by: SarekOfVulcan
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 2:06pm)
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun.
PLEASE ADD JAYRON32. HE WAS VERY MEAN TO ME AND SAID I COULD KEEP EDITING WIKIPEDIA IF I *NEVER* TALKED TO ANYONE ON THEIR TALK PAGE AND ONLY EDITED ARTICLES.
The bastard!
Surely it would be better for da 'pedia if you never edited articles and just edited talk pages.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(SarekOfVulcan @ Tue 4th January 2011, 2:44pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 2:06pm)
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun.
See androids fighting Brad and Janet See Anne Francis in Forbidden Planet
I didn't know Francis had died. Her mole will be missed.
Posted by: Obesity
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Tue 4th January 2011, 12:04pm)
ED's defense is that this "free speech" is protected because it's all satire. Such a defense might be reasonable if the readership is educated enough to recognize it as satire. In the case of ED, however, satire passes over into outright hate speech, simply because ED readers are uneducated, inexperienced in the real world, and irresponsible.
ED is an attractive nuisance for children and other stupid people, and has no right to exist.
BUT I LIKE ENCLOPEDIA DRAMATICA AND I AM VERY EDUCATE AND SMRT.
Posted by: Newyorkbrad
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 4:49pm)
See androids fighting Brad and Janet See Anne Francis in Forbidden Planet
That should be "Anne Francis stars in / Forbidden Planet."
And for the record, that's a different Brad.
(No points for the obvious reply here.)
Posted by: gomi
QUOTE(Alison @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 8:11pm)
Alison, let me be the first to say that you are really rockin' that new hairdo of yours. And I hope your finger heals soon.
Posted by: EricBarbour
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 4th January 2011, 5:35pm)
Somebody missed their nap.
Posted by: dtobias
I nominate Daniel Brandt for Dick of Distinction, for his continued contempt for the freedom of speech of anybody he doesn't like.
There were earlier rumblings about putting Vic AKA Joehazelton (T-C-L-K-R-D)
up for the Cojones award. Anyone care to make this a formal nom?
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 3:00pm)
The default condition, enjoyed by the vast majority of mankind, is "I don't edit," which requires no proof.
Unless you're asserting it to make a point. Speak about the person who doesn't edit in the abstract and make your point that way.
But I bet you're secretly an editor, because you're just messed up enough to play that game. (you're here after all... the default condition of the vast majority of mankind w.r.t. WR is "what's that") Could be wrong, and I really don't care either way. HTH, HAND.
Cue up your use of profanity again, because your argument's weak. Go for it, I know it makes you feel better.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:26pm)
I nominate Daniel Brandt for Dick of Distinction, for his continued contempt for the freedom of speech of anybody he doesn't like.
So all the problems with Wikipedia reside with people who don't have anything to with the place?
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Gents, please. Your lack of decorum grates against the hallowed traditions of this pageant.
Posted by: SB_Johnny
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:42pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 4th January 2011, 3:00pm)
The default condition, enjoyed by the vast majority of mankind, is "I don't edit," which requires no proof.
Unless you're asserting it to make a point. Speak about the person who doesn't edit in the abstract and make your point that way.
But I bet you're secretly an editor, because you're just messed up enough to play that game. (you're here after all... the default condition of the vast majority of mankind w.r.t. WR is "what's that") Could be wrong, and I really don't care either way. HTH, HAND.
Cue up your use of profanity again, because your argument's weak. Go for it, I know it makes you feel better.
Uh, Larry, you appear to be channeling Ottava. Please stop channeling Ottava.
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 4th January 2011, 7:38pm)
QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 4th January 2011, 3:26pm)
I nominate Daniel Brandt for Dick of Distinction, for his continued contempt for the freedom of speech of anybody he doesn't like.
Please bear in mind that contestants are evaluated solely for their activities on-Wiki.
I think he's got enough influence from wherever he lurks that he can be evaluated solely for on-wiki stuff.
QUOTE
There were earlier rumblings about putting Vic AKA Joehazelton (T-C-L-K-R-D)
up for the Cojones award. Anyone care to make this a formal nom?
Pass. I think you need to actually do something on-wiki, not just bay shrilly.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 4th January 2011, 3:50pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 4th January 2011, 7:38pm)
QUOTE(dtobias @ Tue 4th January 2011, 3:26pm)
I nominate Daniel Brandt for Dick of Distinction, for his continued contempt for the freedom of speech of anybody he doesn't like.
Please bear in mind that contestants are evaluated solely for their activities on-Wiki.
I think he's got enough influence from wherever he lurks that he can be evaluated solely for on-wiki stuff.
Not enough to be made an admin, which is another prerequisite for DICKhood.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:38pm)
I'll entertain a VL nomination here. Ottava, is that your intent?
Yes.
And can you add LessHeardvanU to Dick?
Anyone else surprised that Jehochman isn't listed anywhere? Mr Kohs, nothing for the paid editor?
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 4th January 2011, 6:38pm)
And while you are at it, throw in AniMate (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, too, for the DICK - a real nasty piece of excrement, to be certain!
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 26th December 2010, 9:15am)
Happy Boxing Day, everyone! The annual "WP:DICK of Distinction" awards pageant is a semi-hallowed tradition here at the Review (new members, http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20081117/the-wikipedia-review-awards-pageants/#more-191 for some background.) To compete for the grand WP:DICK of Distinction prize, the contestant must be an active admin or admin defrocked over the past year.
Here are the categories for nomination:
WP:DICK of Distinction -- for all-around rottenness by an admin
The Tag-Team Event
Miss Incongeniality
and for the good guys...
the Straight Shooter award for honest admins
and the Cojones de latón, for the non-admin who has distinguished himself in combat with the cabal
Please add my wikibuddy, Tarc (T-C-L-K-R-D)
as Miss Incongeniality
Thanks
VOC
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 4:17pm)
QUOTE(Alison @ Mon 3rd January 2011, 8:11pm)
Alison, let me be the first to say that you are really rockin' that new hairdo of yours. And I hope your finger heals soon.
She just showing you that you're Number 1 with her...
Miss Incongenialty: Roux (T-C-L-K-R-D)
- I'm sort of embarrassed that we forgot him!
Cojones: Silver seren (T-C-L-K-R-D)
- WR's go-to guy on the mothership!
Cojones: MZMcBride (T-C-L-K-R-D)
- he certainly had balls to do the RfA route again!
Posted by: thekohser
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 4th January 2011, 7:09pm)
Anyone else surprised that Jehochman isn't listed anywhere? Mr Kohs, nothing for the paid editor?
He's more of a weasel than a dick.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 5th January 2011, 9:02am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 4th January 2011, 7:09pm)
Anyone else surprised that Jehochman isn't listed anywhere? Mr Kohs, nothing for the paid editor?
He's more of a weasel than a dick.
Well, someone ought to pop him!
Posted by: thekohser
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 5th January 2011, 10:00am)
Well, someone ought to pop him!
That was freakin' creepy! Looks like it was executive produced by http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2008/05/08/erik-moller-wmf/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chillum&curid=20685313&diff=323231907&oldid=323178670, Inc.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 5th January 2011, 7:12am)
That was freakin' creepy! Looks like it was executive produced by http://www.cydeweys.com/blog/2008/05/08/erik-moller-wmf/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chillum&curid=20685313&diff=323231907&oldid=323178670, Inc.
Synesthesia. Maybe these guys were hanging out with Tim Leary or Henry Luce (T-H-L-K-D).
Posted by: EricBarbour
Okay, there's a massive shit-ton of nominees for each prize/"prize".
Let's vote!!
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 5th January 2011, 1:35pm)
Okay, there's a massive shit-ton of nominees for each prize/"prize".
Let's vote!!
Nah -- let's let this thread die down, then we'll close it. Then we'll have a few weeks for electioneering -- I'd like to see some dandy, well-thought-out statements extolling the qualifications of the respective candidates. My plan is to hold the actual voting until the beginning of February, and then time the awards ceremony in such a way as to upstage the Oscars.
Posted by: gomi
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
Posted by: Sxeptomaniac
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:06am)
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:49am)
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr. Dad.
Bzzt. Except I can think of of one memorable Hale, Sr. role without google or WP: he was Little John in the "original" (and still the best) 1939 Errol Flynn Robin Hood. In which he was perfect and basically defined that character forever (what there is of him), rather like Bela Lugosi and Dracula. Except whenever I see that film I have the uncanny feeling that any moment he's going to do the roll-eyes-open/close-mouth-open/close-hands thing of the skipper trying to keep himself from strangling Gilligan.
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun. There's a palomino horse in one scene in Robin Hood that looks very much like Roy Rogers' Trigger. And by golly, it is Trigger! And look! Scarlett O'Hara is being courted by a young Clark Kent with no glasses!
Oddball side note: my grandfather was one of the early incarnations in that film, so to speak. Nothing really big about it, as he played one of the multitude of merry men, so the back of his head is probably in a scene or two. We have a picture of him on set horsing around in his costume, but that's about it.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 3:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
Yeah, we could do it in two tranches or divisions or parties, and finally have a GIANT DICK BOWL finale. It would be like football or politics.
Posted by: Newyorkbrad
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 5:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
As a public service to streamline the election, I hereby withdraw myself as a nominee.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Newyorkbrad @ Wed 5th January 2011, 2:53pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 5:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
As a public service to streamline the election, I hereby withdraw myself as a nominee.
Posted by: Cla68
Before I forget, here's one piece of evidence for why Jrtayloriv and The Four Deuces should be considered for tag team:
Good evidence. You should write it up for the electioneering phase. But here in Tinseltown, we like something more than statistics -- give us adjectives, similes, and above all, give us genuine passion and bonafide sycophancy.
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 5th January 2011, 3:44pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 5:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
If we have a dick run-off we really should have a doctor look at it.
Good point. Plus, every year we have two tiers of DICKS, and a point system so that you may divide your voting points among two candidates, or give them all to your absolute favorite.
Posted by: Doc glasgow
So, I've got until February to get arbcommed for some BLP action that pisses of the usual suspects?
That's no challenge at all - shall I do it twice?
Posted by: radek
QUOTE(Newyorkbrad @ Wed 5th January 2011, 4:53pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 5:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
As a public service to streamline the election, I hereby withdraw myself as a nominee.
Actually I think that what we need is an award that is similar to "Cojones de laton" but a bit more subtle. I suggest "Cojonitos de laton". It's still laton, but it's "-itos". I nominate NYBrad for that one.
Also, just slap Jehochman in there somewhere already. Also, also, I missed the TFD nomination. He's certainly part of a tag team or two, and possibly a Lawyering DICK to boot, but I don't think that that particular instance is the most relevant.
Posted by: Doc glasgow
Yes, I think there needs to be a new award:
"The Mike Godwin memorial award" for Wikilawyering shysters.
I nominate Cyclopia
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 5th January 2011, 7:34pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 5th January 2011, 3:44pm)
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 5th January 2011, 5:40pm)
I think we need a run-off, at least for Dick. We have too many candidates for a reasonable vote.
If we have a dick run-off we really should have a doctor look at it.
Good point. Plus, every year we have two tiers of DICKS, and a point system so that you may divide your voting points among two candidates, or give them all to your absolute favorite.
If we have a run-off and get a set of nominees for DICK, can the rest get the ANUS award just for existing?
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Sxeptomaniac @ Wed 5th January 2011, 3:43pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:06am)
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:49am)
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr. Dad.
Bzzt. Except I can think of of one memorable Hale, Sr. role without google or WP: he was Little John in the "original" (and still the best) 1939 Errol Flynn Robin Hood. In which he was perfect and basically defined that character forever (what there is of him), rather like Bela Lugosi and Dracula. Except whenever I see that film I have the uncanny feeling that any moment he's going to do the roll-eyes-open/close-mouth-open/close-hands thing of the skipper trying to keep himself from strangling Gilligan.
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun. There's a palomino horse in one scene in Robin Hood that looks very much like Roy Rogers' Trigger. And by golly, it is Trigger! And look! Scarlett O'Hara is being courted by a young Clark Kent with no glasses!
Oddball side note: my grandfather was one of the early incarnations in that film, so to speak. Nothing really big about it, as he played one of the multitude of merry men, so the back of his head is probably in a scene or two. We have a picture of him on set horsing around in his costume, but that's about it.
"Grandfather and Merry Men in Tights"
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(radek @ Wed 5th January 2011, 6:22pm)
Actually I think that what we need is an award that is similar to "Cojones de laton" but a bit more subtle. I suggest "Cojonitos de laton". It's still laton, but it's "-itos".
Or perhaps cojonitos de conejo. Little balls of the rabbit. Conejo can also mean "pussy." *
MR
*Ever read Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls?
Posted by: radek
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 5th January 2011, 9:40pm)
QUOTE(Sxeptomaniac @ Wed 5th January 2011, 3:43pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:06am)
QUOTE(gomi @ Tue 4th January 2011, 11:49am)
Brad's less like Al Pacino and more like Alan Hale, Sr. (T-H-L-K-D). The guy was in 235 movies and if anyone remembers him at all (not likely), it's because he was the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hale,_Jr. Dad.
Bzzt. Except I can think of of one memorable Hale, Sr. role without google or WP: he was Little John in the "original" (and still the best) 1939 Errol Flynn Robin Hood. In which he was perfect and basically defined that character forever (what there is of him), rather like Bela Lugosi and Dracula. Except whenever I see that film I have the uncanny feeling that any moment he's going to do the roll-eyes-open/close-mouth-open/close-hands thing of the skipper trying to keep himself from strangling Gilligan.
The old films where you see people in early incarnations are fun. There's a palomino horse in one scene in Robin Hood that looks very much like Roy Rogers' Trigger. And by golly, it is Trigger! And look! Scarlett O'Hara is being courted by a young Clark Kent with no glasses!
Oddball side note: my grandfather was one of the early incarnations in that film, so to speak. Nothing really big about it, as he played one of the multitude of merry men, so the back of his head is probably in a scene or two. We have a picture of him on set horsing around in his costume, but that's about it.
"Grandfather and Merry Men in Tights"
I've always liked Michael Landon in God's Little Acre, as the albino gold magnet.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
More Straight Shooter fun: Marine 69-71Â (T-C-L-K-R-D)
has put up with a lot of Wiki crap over the years and he keeps going strong. I always liked Tony -- he is a fine writer and a good admin, so put him up for this honor.
That's a question I'd like to hear an answer for. He was a very minor player in the climate change battles, otherwise I don't see much of anything. Horse nommed him:
QUOTE
A real under-the-radar type is the Australian editor Johnfos, who fights a good fight on renewable energy issues.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 5:54pm)
By the way, I like that no one recognized me for the courage part in taking on Sue Gardner when it came to pedophiles editing and other such things.
Maybe next year we can have a Profiles In Self-Importance award.
Well, not ha ha ha rolling on the floor, but I think most of us got the joke some time ago and assumed (apparently incorrectly) that everyone else did too.
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 5:54pm)
By the way, I like that no one recognized me for the courage part in taking on Sue Gardner when it came to pedophiles editing and other such things.
You make loud noises but get nothing done other than annoying people and/or making the good guys look bad when they agree with you. Not even sure what to name the award for that.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Thu 6th January 2011, 7:18pm)
You make loud noises but get nothing done other than annoying people and/or making the good guys look bad when they agree with you. Not even sure what to name the award for that.
The Lennon & Yoko Protest Award, maybe. Ottava can be our first candidate. Given to people you wish weren't on your side, whenever they are.
Hair-peace, bed-peace, pedo-peace. You know-- we all do what we can....
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
How about jpgordon? I haven't really followed his exploits, but I recall reading some strong words about him recently around here somewhere.
Posted by: Ottava
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
The only other person on WR down in there is Privatemusings. People sure talk a big game but nothing.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 7th January 2011, 1:28am)
QUOTE
A real under-the-radar type is the Australian editor Johnfos, who fights a good fight on renewable energy issues.
Actually I forgot which fight is considered "good" on WR.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 8:51pm)
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
Relax, Ottava. Everyone here at the Review acknowledges your supreme and unchallenged leadership. You're like a http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9A%CE%BF%CE%AC%CE%BB%CE%B5%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%82 to us.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Rather than a "dick off", wouldn't it be more in keep with the spirit of the place to have a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_chain_(sex)#Daisy_chain award?
Posted by: radek
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 1:06am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 8:51pm)
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
Relax, Ottava. Everyone here at the Review acknowledges your supreme and unchallenged leadership. You're like a http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9A%CE%BF%CE%AC%CE%BB%CE%B5%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%82 to us.
And lay of the French, you ignorant yankee ingrate.
Posted by: Gruntled
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Fri 7th January 2011, 6:56am)
Actually I forgot which fight is considered "good" on WR.
I don't suppose there's a strong collective POV on that here. But it raises an interesting question. Suppose there were a subject where we were generally agreed, say that the Pacific Ocean is the world's largest ocean (to give a trivial but hopefully non-controversial example). Suppose there were a group of editors fighting to say that this is wrong, that in fact the Atlantic is bigger (and equally daft things do happen on Wikipedia). Now say a couple of admins come in and break up this group by the usual tag-team, wikilawyering, CU abuse tactics we know and love. Would anyone be nominating these admins in this thread, or would we argue that the disruptive editors deserve it?
Posted by: Zoloft
QUOTE(radek @ Fri 7th January 2011, 1:51am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 8:51pm)
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
And lay of[f] the French, you ignorant yankee ingrate.
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
And lay of[f] the French, you ignorant yankee ingrate.
I'm starting the one week countdown to the close of nominations.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert. I would put him and Will up for tag-team if the field were not so crowded already, and had Will not taken the honors with Virginia Slim last year.
Posted by: Ottava
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 2:06am)
QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 6th January 2011, 8:51pm)
I find it odd how people claim to be on the same side as me yet I'm the only one out there. What are we, the French Army where we all "fight together" by running away while leaving one guy behind?
Relax, Ottava. Everyone here at the Review acknowledges your supreme and unchallenged leadership. You're like a http://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9A%CE%BF%CE%AC%CE%BB%CE%B5%CE%BC%CE%BF%CF%82 to us.
If you would have paid attention to Meta, you'd see that I prefer the title "Demon Prince".
Posted by: thekohser
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 11:13am)
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert. I would put him and Will up for tag-team if the field were not so crowded already, and had Will not taken the honors with Virginia Slim last year.
I gotta say that GWH determining by behavior alone that a new account was a sock being used to continue a debate wasn't off-target. It was pretty obvious.
The problem inherently remains that the "block those with unapproved opinions" is a childish way to run an encyclopedia.
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 7th January 2011, 5:05pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 11:13am)
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert. I would put him and Will up for tag-team if the field were not so crowded already, and had Will not taken the honors with Virginia Slim last year.
I gotta say that GWH determining by behavior alone that a new account was a sock being used to continue a debate wasn't off-target. It was pretty obvious.
The problem inherently remains that the "block those with unapproved opinions" is a childish way to run an encyclopedia.
Also, the "disagree with an admin - go to jail" bit.
Posted by: Zoloft
I nominate Uncle G for 'Straight Shooter.'
He's the closest thing they have to a 'voice of reason' at AN/I.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 11:13am)
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert.
You can nominate him for hypocrisy, too. Does no one remember the time GWH tried to http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=8671
Remember what he http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=186906448 (Several admins jumped all over him for saying that.)
Remember the http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20138?
How about http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=23478?
Or the time he http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=16583? Even Everyking was appalled.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 7th January 2011, 1:46pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 11:13am)
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert.
You can nominate him for hypocrisy, too. Does no one remember the time GWH tried to http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=8671
Isn't that special. Yup, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_William_Herbert. Deleted by Edgar181:
QUOTE
A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content). An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.
He's the closest thing they have to a 'voice of reason' at AN/I.
That idiot? I nominate him for DICK - certainly as a lifetime achievement of dicky behavior!!!
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 7th January 2011, 1:46pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 7th January 2011, 11:13am)
Here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=406477175#Falsely_stating_vandalism_on_the_Tide_article_and_subsequently_protecting_it of DICKishness by Georgewilliamherbert.
You can nominate him for hypocrisy, too.
And on the topic of hypocrisy, here's a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Blocking_policy&diff=prev&oldid=406452759.
Hey, I just noticed that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/SlimVirgin_(2nd) is funny, too. I found it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sunsplash&diff=240771257&oldid=240762604.
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
I've decided I want to nominate jpgordon for DICK. What tipped the scales was his user page; all the most power-abusive, arrogant admins seem to have super-narcissistic user pages. And he's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon#Ironically
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Fri 7th January 2011, 8:03pm)
I've decided I want to nominate jpgordon for DICK. What tipped the scales was his user page; all the most power-abusive, arrogant admins seem to have super-narcissistic user pages. And he's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon#Ironically
He's like the poster child of baby-boomer flakes. He's either a "http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20823" or a wealthy, annoying http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=12744&st=0&p=55271entry55271. (I say, what's the diff?)
He was http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20005 at one time. No wonder he's a WP admin, it's a haven for OCD crackpots like Josh. Glad he's not my next-door neighbor. (Or my business partner.)
There are plenty of worse admins on WP, but Josh does deserve some recognition--if only for assisting Jayjg and SV in the past.
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sat 8th January 2011, 5:49am)
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Fri 7th January 2011, 8:03pm)
I've decided I want to nominate jpgordon for DICK. What tipped the scales was his user page; all the most power-abusive, arrogant admins seem to have super-narcissistic user pages. And he's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon#Ironically
He's like the poster child of baby-boomer flakes. He's either a "http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20823" or a wealthy, annoying http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=12744&st=0&p=55271entry55271. (I say, what's the diff?)
He was http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20005 at one time. No wonder he's a WP admin, it's a haven for OCD crackpots like Josh. Glad he's not my next-door neighbor. (Or my business partner.)
There are plenty of worse admins on WP, but Josh does deserve some recognition--if only for assisting Jayjg and SV in the past.
I'm impressed. The Georgewilliamherbert stuff was impressive also.
Posted by: Gruntled
QUOTE(A%20Horse%20With%20No%20Name @ Sat 8th January 2011, 12:39am)
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Fri 7th January 2011, 4:18pm)
I nominate Uncle G for 'Straight Shooter.'
He's the closest thing they have to a 'voice of reason' at AN/I.
That idiot? I nominate him for DICK - certainly as a lifetime achievement of dicky behavior!!!
I'm not sure if he's been quite bad enough this last year to win the Dick award. However, i'd certainly agree with Horse that he thoroughly deserves a lifetime award.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(P%20o%20e%20t%20l%20i%20s%20t%20e%20r @ Sat 8th January 2011, 5:51pm)
I'm not sure if he's been quite bad enough this last year to win the Dick award. However, i'd certainly agree with Horse that he thoroughly deserves a lifetime award.
We'll also need a whole special category for you.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sat 8th January 2011, 12:19pm)
QUOTE(P%20o%20e%20t%20l%20i%20s%20t%20e%20r @ Sat 8th January 2011, 5:51pm)
I'm not sure if he's been quite bad enough this last year to win the Dick award. However, i'd certainly agree with Horse that he thoroughly deserves a lifetime award.
We'll also need a whole special category for you.
Posted by: Alison
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Tue 4th January 2011, 9:04am)
Here's my advice to you, Alison. As a sysop and checkuser on ED, you should go back and visit ED for the purpose of flushing http://encyclopediadramatica.com/LOIC down the drain, and make sure it stays flushed. If you get away with this, then flush the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aboriginal, as well as the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Steve_Hodder-Watt written to punish the Australian citizen who complained to the Australian authorities. Then resign your sysop and checkuser status at ED, flush your user page, and never go back.
Gone. I can't flush those articles as they'd be back in a second, so there's no point. But gone.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Alison @ Sat 8th January 2011, 7:55pm)
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Tue 4th January 2011, 9:04am)
Here's my advice to you, Alison. As a sysop and checkuser on ED, you should go back and visit ED for the purpose of flushing http://encyclopediadramatica.com/LOIC down the drain, and make sure it stays flushed. If you get away with this, then flush the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aboriginal, as well as the http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Steve_Hodder-Watt written to punish the Australian citizen who complained to the Australian authorities. Then resign your sysop and checkuser status at ED, flush your user page, and never go back.
Gone. I can't flush those articles as they'd be back in a second, so there's no point. But gone.
She did it. But she's right, certain dickheads will just recreate those articles. Hackers never change. The aging ones drop out, and they automatically get replaced by young snots.
Posted by: lonza leggiera
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Sat 8th January 2011, 3:03pm)
I've decided I want to nominate jpgordon for DICK. What tipped the scales was his user page; all the most power-abusive, arrogant admins seem to have super-narcissistic user pages. And he's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon#Ironically
His aversion to adverbs seems to be somewhat selective. He would appear to find "currently", "now", "insufficiently", "really" and "too" tasteful enough to be allowed to grace his own prose.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 9th January 2011, 10:29am)
The Nominees thus far are
Impressive bunch of DICKS!
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
No "Bottom Wipers par Excellence" category?
Posted by: Malleus
I must have missed something. How come Ottava's been nominated when he's been banned for a year?
Posted by: It's the blimp, Frank
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 11th January 2011, 3:46am)
I must have missed something. How come Ottava's been nominated when he's been banned for a year?
I think it's a grudge match between him and Lar.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
I haven't followed Ottava's on-Wiki career closely enough. If he's been banned for a year, I don't see him as a viable contestant. What do others think? Lar?
Posted by: Lar
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 11th January 2011, 3:11am)
I haven't followed Ottava's on-Wiki career closely enough. If he's been banned for a year, I don't see him as a viable contestant. What do others think? Lar?
I'd say it would be a nom for his WMF-wide activities... but, not my call.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 11th January 2011, 2:11am)
I haven't followed Ottava's on-Wiki career closely enough. If he's been banned for a year, I don't see him as a viable contestant. What do others think?
Ottava's offline presence permeates Wikipedia much the way that Harry Lime's off-screen presence permeated "The Third Man." I am waiting for Ottava's zither-scored triumphant return to WP.
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 11th January 2011, 2:11am)
Lar?
No, I am not Lar.
Posted by: RMHED
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 11th January 2011, 8:09pm)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 11th January 2011, 2:11am)
I haven't followed Ottava's on-Wiki career closely enough. If he's been banned for a year, I don't see him as a viable contestant. What do others think?
Ottava's offline presence permeates Wikipedia much the way that Harry Lime's off-screen presence permeated "The Third Man." I am waiting for Ottava's zither-scored triumphant return to WP.
I was thinking more fart at a sewerage treatment plant, pungent for a short while but is soon lost amidst the over powering general stench.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 10th January 2011, 6:56am)
Impressive bunch of DICKS!
And yet, they're such tiny little ones......
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
QUOTE(Lar @ Tue 11th January 2011, 7:21am)
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Tue 11th January 2011, 3:11am)
I haven't followed Ottava's on-Wiki career closely enough. If he's been banned for a year, I don't see him as a viable contestant. What do others think? Lar?
I'd say it would be a nom for his WMF-wide activities... but, not my call.
That's good enough for me. I do remember that the noms came about as you and Ottava called each other out.
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Last call for nominations. We have a pretty good crop to work with. Also, start putting together your focus groups and preparing your blurbs to promote your favorite candidates.
Posted by: EricBarbour
"Focus groups". Ha ha. Let's go! Vote vote vote!!!
Posted by: Herschelkrustofsky
Down, boy. We don't want to have premature elections here (plus, if they last for more than 4 hours, see a physician.) Let the anticipation build in a slow, deliberate way, and then we'll vote in February when all the other awards shows are getting ready.