yes, de.wiki is broken. Options

[EricBarbour]

This was the featured article today.

[Text]

Dewiki made a mistake here, but various reports say they have the best overall quality in articles, and don't tolerate any fancruft.

[Gruntled]

Dewiki made a mistake here, but various reports say they have the best overall quality in articles, and don't tolerate any fancruft.

I've started contributing recently to Dewiki and it's certainly a much friendlier and more co-operative place than the English one (not that that's saying much). But I think standards are higher on the Spanish one.

[radek]

Dewiki made a mistake here, but various reports say they have the best overall quality in articles, and don't tolerate any fancruft.

I've started contributing recently to Dewiki and it's certainly a much friendlier and more co-operative place than the English one (not that that's saying much). But I think standards are higher on the Spanish one.

From the parts of Spanish wiki I'm a bit familiar with - most of which are actually Mexico related - they do seem pretty solid. Strangely enough it seems like those articles are better written and more accurate and at the same time almost completely unsourced.