The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Should we restart Durova's RfC or Arbcom?, With friends like these...
Disillusioned Lackey
post Sun 9th December 2007, 8:35pm
Post #1


Unregistered









This is a pretty short thread, but just for the sake of it....

QUOTE
Should we restart Durova's RfC or Arbcom?

Yesterday I had a short chat with Durova and I got an impression that she is very unhappy that the community did not heard her side of the story. The RfC was closed because of the Arbcom and voting by the Arbcom members on the decision started then she had no chances to present her evidence. Basically there was only Thanksgiving holidays between starting of Arbcom and getting into the voting stage almost if the members of the Arbitration committee had a preconceived opinion and were not interested in Durova's side of the story. I am not in a position to explain her side of the story but as I understand she was under the tremendous pressure caused by the real-life stalking and harassment due to her involvement into investigations of a few high-profile cases and she had reasons to believe that there was an active wikipedian involved into sick email harassment of female wikipedians (obviously it was not User:!! but she had thought he was).

On the other hand it looks like there is a great deal of misunderstanding about the two mailing lists that probably needs to be addressed by some investigation. Finally, it may be worth to give people possibility to discuss all the good work Durova did before the incident as many people only heard of her in relation to the bad block.

What do you think might be a correct format for such a discussion: Arbcom seems to excessive as no forceful remedies would probably come out of it. On the other hand a significant amount of evidence might not be open (e.g. different E-mails) that is not very good fit into the format of an RfD Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Please withdraw that, Alex. I respect your concern and am very grateful, but this is too much of a hot potato. I don't think it would do any good to try that right now. If my reputation takes a hit, so be it. The drama hasn't been a good thing. Maybe these ideas would work later, once things calm down. Thank you. DurovaCharge! 05:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Nathan
post Sat 15th December 2007, 4:32am
Post #2


Retired
******

Group: Inactive
Posts: 1,609
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 6:35pm
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 17

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



She has a reputation all right...

(Sorry I couldn't resist)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Miltopia
post Wed 19th December 2007, 9:25am
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 3:19am
Member No.: 3,658

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Please withdraw this, Alex.

Please refactor.

Please strikethrough.

Stuff like this makes me glad I'm banned. This would irritate the hell out of me if I had to work around it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 2:12am