FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed.
Joseph100
post
Post #1


Senior Member like Viridae
*****

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 667
Joined:
Member No.: 871



Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I've made numerous attempts to try to work with them in order to edit and correct glaring factual mistakes, as well as blatant boldface bias on various biographies of Republican officeholders from Illinois.

What I have found is Wikipedia is a complete totally filled with hate filled Marxists children, and tin pot, petty dictators drunk with power, whose concept of fairness is distorted and corrupt and with out control.

So, I am looking for advice on how to go about to diminish, destroy and neutralize Wikipedia.

Any reasonable suggestion will be taken under advisement.

For those who are pro-Wikipedia. All I have to say is this... there is nothing that you could say, do, or argue which would convinced me that Wikipedia has any merit, or good for the body politic or the Internet at large.
It is my sworn belief that Wikipedia is absolutely a cesspool of evil.

Thank you

This post has been edited by Joseph100:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
chankachank
post
Post #2


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 9
Joined:
Member No.: 1,117



I've already had a love/hate relationship with the Internet for the past decade or so. I knew a long time ago that epidemic intellectual laziness was going to be one of its main products. Sure, it is interesting and fun to browse around endlessly, learning new things, "seeing" documents and data that I never would have seen otherwise, communicating instantaneously, etc. It seems to have been "good" for society overall, and I've certainly had my fun. But as someone who was trained in the use of an academic library at the graduate level, I knew that the next generation would overwhemingly just get their data by typing search terms into Google.

With the advent of Wikipedia, and its inevitable top ranking for search results, it has become the default source of knowledge on almost every topic. I will admit to clicking on Wikipedia results to get an overview of something. I don't like this kind of "digest-knowledge" (as Ezra Pound called it, distinct from what we used to have, historein -- "to find out for oneself").

What can we do with Wikipedia? I like what the late Jean Baudrillard had to say (he died last week):

Cipher, don't decipher. Create illusions. Turn into an enigma what is clear. Make unintelligible what is far too intelligible. Render unreadable the event itself. Work all the events to make them unintelligible. Accentuate the fake transparency of the world to spread a terroristic confusion, to spread the germs or viruses of a radical illusion, make a radical disillusion of the real.


Take from that what you will.

This post has been edited by chankachank:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Joseph100   Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed.  
dtobias   Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I...  
Joseph100   [quote name='Joseph100' post='25340' date='Sun 18...  
Yanksox   Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I don...  
Nathan   Of course, one can easily make the assertion that ...  
Kurt M. Weber   Like communism it is fantastic in theory I would...  
Jonny Cache   Like communism it is fantastic in theory I wou...  
Kurt M. Weber   [quote name='Kurt M. Weber' post='25429' date='Mo...  
Jonny Cache   [quote name='Kurt M. Weber' post='25429' date='M...  
Skyrocket   How to be REALLY anonymous on Wikipedia: 1) Get l...  
michael   How to be REALLY anonymous on Wikipedia: 1) Get ...  
Nathan   I prefer my own method. ;)  
Joel Leyden   Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I've...  
Somey   Well, this is becoming one of the more interesting...  
Joseph100   I submit that the term “cesspool” is...  
gomi   Destroying Wikipedia would probably be remarkably ...  
dtobias   Wikipedia doesn't let Joseph100 get his way on...  
Jonny Cache   Wikipedia doesn't let Joseph100 get his way o...  
Joseph100   Wikipedia doesn't let Joseph100 get his way o...  
Skyrocket   "His or her?" Just another proof of the ...  
Jonny Cache   "His or her?" Just another proof of the...  
JohnA   Wikipedia is evil in a sense because its been perv...  
Cedric   The Russian Revolution did not start out to be ev...  
gomi   Interesting. If Jimbo is WP's Vladimir I. Le...  
Jonny Cache   Interesting. If Jimbo is WP's Vladimir I. L...  
JohnA   [quote name='gomi' post='25413' date='Mon 19th Ma...  
bernie724   [quote name='Jonny Cache' post='25414' date='Mon ...  
Skyrocket   And here is part of their Wikipedian Manifesto, st...  
Jonny Cache   And here is part of their Wikipedian Manifesto, s...  
Cedric   OMG!! I just had a look at Raul654's ...  
Jonny Cache   OMG!! I just had a look at Raul654's...  
Jonny Cache   Look, in my humble opinion, it's just plain si...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)