FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
We lost -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> We lost, Wikipedia wins
Emperor
post
Post #1


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



There is an entire generation of young adults out there who believes a bunch of stuff they read in Wikipedia.

They think Wikipedian, that combative, know-it-all, don't believe it unless they read it online, partisan, can't-be-reasoned-with attitude.

Wikipedia critics tried to get a message out but were overwhelmed by crazies, many of them Wikipedians themselves intentionally muddying the waters.

It's a decade later. The people who remember how to think are dying off. Game over.

Jimbo made a few bucks. Hopefully he feels bad a little. After a decade of actively serving hardcore pornography to children in schools he should be in jail.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Ottava
post
Post #2


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



I think that is a little broad. There will still be tons of mechanics, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, mathematicians, engineers, etc. that aren't affected in any way if Wikipedia is "wrong" in their field. It either works or it doesn't and the consequences are rather quick in those fields. Then there are tons of fields that don't really have much on Wikipedia - like clerks in a convenience store or cooks.

Most of society is immune from Wikipedia and anything like it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post
Post #3


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 9th September 2012, 11:10pm) *

I think that is a little broad. There will still be tons of mechanics, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, mathematicians, engineers, etc. that aren't affected in any way if Wikipedia is "wrong" in their field. It either works or it doesn't and the consequences are rather quick in those fields. Then there are tons of fields that don't really have much on Wikipedia - like clerks in a convenience store or cooks.

Most of society is immune from Wikipedia and anything like it.



YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG ON THIS...

SEE Andrew Keen
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post
Post #4


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 10th September 2012, 5:38am) *

QUOTE(Ottava @ Sun 9th September 2012, 11:10pm) *

I think that is a little broad. There will still be tons of mechanics, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, mathematicians, engineers, etc. that aren't affected in any way if Wikipedia is "wrong" in their field. It either works or it doesn't and the consequences are rather quick in those fields. Then there are tons of fields that don't really have much on Wikipedia - like clerks in a convenience store or cooks.

Most of society is immune from Wikipedia and anything like it.



YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG ON THIS...

SEE Andrew Keen



Relying on Andrew Keen to critique Jimbo is a failure to not realize that everyone connected to such things are exaggerating their importance. You have chosen one cult charade over another. Neither side is meaningful or has any real influence. You need to spend more time in reality and not the internet. The internet people are only well-known or influential in their own minds.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 10th September 2012, 6:41pm) *

You need to spend more time in reality and not the internet. The internet people are only well-known or influential in their own minds.

(IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)