The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article Candidates • Featured Article Review • Articles for Deletion • Deletion Review

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Thad Cochran, WP smear apparatus at work again.
nobs
post Tue 5th June 2007, 5:33pm
Post #1


#2242 most prolific contributor of out of 1 million+ WP users
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 575
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 6:08pm
From: North America
Member No.: 16

WP user page - talk
check - contribs


Conservapedia is on to something regarding WP smear factory. JoshuaZ removed the slanders from two articles, but failed to report it to BLP Noticboard. The same guilt-by-association October surprise was used at the History News Network against Sen George Allen, problem is, there was no association.

Senator Cochrane's office has been contacted I understand, and other news organizations. Interesting to see where this leads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 5 13, 1:10pm