SarekOfVulcan Options

[Ather]

What do we know about this fucker: SarekOfVulcan?

Earlier today he reverted and then blocked Triton Rocker just because he didn't like TR's edits. His user page suggests he's a wanker (but a very modest one who doesn't like blowing his own trumpet but feels he must, anyway). Anyone have any other views on the matter? I've come across several admins previously who have abused their tools to get their own way. Is this another one to add to the list? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif)

[anklet with the pom-pom]

Here's an interesting little exchange in the continuing saga of Sarek the Sanctimonious...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sar...iton_and_others

[SarekOfVulcan]

Here's an interesting little exchange in the continuing saga of Sarek the Sanctimonious...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sar...iton_and_others

And an interesting little exchange in the continuing saga of someone who even socks on WR:

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal to amend ban on SRQ imposed at ANI: from 1 year to indef (T-H-L-K-D)

[anklet with the pom-pom]

Here's an interesting little exchange in the continuing saga of Sarek the Sanctimonious...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sar...iton_and_others

And an interesting little exchange in the continuing saga of someone who even socks on WR:

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal to amend ban on SRQ imposed at ANI: from 1 year to indef (T-H-L-K-D)

And I am supposed to care about that link because why, exactly, Garrett? Oh, wait a minute...I just re-read all of what you wrote (because I usually just try to cut to the chase and rarely read every piece of drivel you do write). You think that I'm a sock of someone here in the review?

Sorry, but no.

I bet you're mad you can't block me for saying things boldly about you here and that's why you're trying to build a case against me, right? You're a jerk everywhere you go and not just WP, aren't you?

This post has been edited by anklet with the pom-pom:

[Somey]

You think that I'm a sock of someone here in the review?

We don't refer to it as a "sock" unless the person actually appears in the same thread with both accounts. Then again, I suppose this thread is really just an extension of the other one about Mr. Sarek, from a year or so ago.

I'd be curious as to whether or not Mr. Sarek is making this allegation based simply on gut feeling (i.e., "writing style") or something more solid, like a helpful tip from someone with CheckUser privileges or even actual CheckUser data. I suppose he has reason to be suspicious, but of course the real test is whether or not Mr. (Ms.?) Anklet is willing to agree that Sarah Palin is completely and irretrievably insane. Since we know of only one person on Earth who doesn't realize that (other than Ms. Palin herself), if Mr. (Ms.?) Anklet won't agree with this, then he/she must be the person in question, right?

And does it show much that I'm unhappy about the recent US election results?

[anklet with the pom-pom]

You think that I'm a sock of someone here in the review?

We don't refer to it as a "sock" unless the person actually appears in the same thread with both accounts. Then again, I suppose this thread is really just an extension of the other one about Mr. Sarek, from a year or so ago.

I'd be curious as to whether or not Mr. Sarek is making this allegation based simply on gut feeling (i.e., "writing style") or something more solid, like a helpful tip from someone with CheckUser privileges or even actual CheckUser data. I suppose he has reason to be suspicious, but of course the real test is whether or not Mr. (Ms.?) Anklet is willing to agree that Sarah Palin is completely and irretrievably insane. Since we know of only one person on Earth who doesn't realize that (other than Ms. Palin herself), if Mr. (Ms.?) Anklet won't agree with this, then he/she must be the person in question, right?

And does it show much that I'm unhappy about the recent US election results?

That's Mr. Anklet to you (and anyone else, really).

Sarah Palin? What does she have to do with this discussion? Is she someone Sarek secretly wants to boff while his wife is boffing vampires?

(IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif)

[Somey]

Sarah Palin? What does she have to do with this discussion? Is she someone Sarek secretly wants to boff while his wife is boffing vampires?

I would assume so, but the fact remains, the person he appears to be accusing you of being is (was?) a known Sarah Palin supporter. Not that there's anything wrong with that, as long as she never actually breathes a word of it to anyone, or vote.

Also, don't knock vampire-boffing until you've tried it. True, it's not as much fun as jerking off with a piece of 160-grade sandpaper, but as long as you go with double-condoms and wear some 1-inch steel neck-armor, you can usually manage it, and of course it's easier than picking up girls at Applebee's.