Wow, 248 posts... idle hands, eh?
couple things:
1. Wikipedia is not a state, and looks to me like the charge here is something akin to "treason".
2. If Wikipedia was a state, I'd hope it wasn't the kind of state where failing to report your friends for having counterrevolutionary thoughts would be cause for sending someone to the gulag.
3. Since everyone denies that Wikipedia is not a state, maybe they should follow the doctrine (by some British dude) of having no "eternal enemies". If Law had in fact become an asset (as most people seem to think), then what's the problem?
|