[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGj3sN-KTcumbZkEwwYobO2CZ6UxA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779634954947&ei=5JzfWaChKYa0qgKXrZegDg&url=https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ne7xzq/wikipedias-science-articles-are-elitist"][img]https://t0.gstatic.com/images? q=tbn:ANd9GcRII31SlwE4ajOczj4pl1HrAmKvaDyNDG16wXPy24nxMCjewxqZyrORw8qfKjTTrHujwq
-VWii3[/img]
Motherboard[/url]
•http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGj3sN-KTcumbZkEwwYobO2CZ6UxA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779634954947&ei=5JzfWaChKYa0qgKXrZegDg&url=https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ne7xzq/wikipedias-science-articles-are-elitist
Motherboard
Maybe Wikipedia readers shouldn't need science degrees to digest articles about basic topics. Just an idea. SHARE; TWEET. Michael Byrne. Oct 12 2017, 8:58am. As science journalists, we aren't all neuroscientists, astrophysicists, and-or climate scientists.
http://news.google.com/news/more?ncl=dMRpnz67F01ErwM&authuser=0&ned=us
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNGj3sN-KTcumbZkEwwYobO2CZ6UxA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779634954947&ei=5JzfWaChKYa0qgKXrZegDg&url=https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ne7xzq/wikipedias-science-articles-are-elitist