FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php) FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2943 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php) Dumb RFA oppose -
"Also, in the past 27 months, candidate has averaged a little over 84 edits a month, and not the 100 they stated. ArcAngel (talk) ) 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)"
For this you're opposing? The fellow (BuickCenturyDriver, famous for the password hacking incident which he references in Q3) has been editing 3 years now, and you're nitpicking how many edits per month? Actually, I might have noted it myself, but I would have clarified that I wasn't opposing on the basis of 1/6 fewer edits per month than stated. 100 is approximately right. Seriously, folks, lighten up. Or find something more useful to do.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined:
Member No.: 8,272
QUOTE
Neutral I'm not impressed with the 75% edit summary usage for Major Edits, and the 43% usage to minor edits. I'll evaluate more later. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 18:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Wed 13th April 2011, 9:48pm)
QUOTE
Neutral I'm not impressed with the 75% edit summary usage for Major Edits, and the 43% usage to minor edits. I'll evaluate more later. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 18:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
:facepalm:
...
Wow, I think that's one of the stupidest reasonings i've ever seen. I may personally use edit summaries a lot, but I don't think the lack of putting the word "reply" or "re" is really detrimental to someone's editing.
Did they even specify major and minor edits specifically in articles? Or is this just in general?
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Wed 13th April 2011, 7:08pm)
Oh, please. Annex this crap.
No offense, but will you please shut the fuck up?
I think there's forum mods around here who can manage to scrape two brain cells together long enough to figure out when to move or not move a thread. This incessant "OMG MODS MODS MODS BANISH THIS THREAD FROM MY EYES!" crying from the masses is nauseating. It is not impacting YOU personally to see a Wikipedia topic outside of the Annex.
Jesus.
As for RfA opposes, nothing tops DougTech's "too many admins" spam, but carping about % of edit summary usage is certainly in the top 5.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
Did no one notice that most of the freaks "voting" in this RFA weren't admins? Just a random mishmash of rollbackers, trolls, and loose screws (take a bow, Jasper).......
Plus: If Fastily quit last year, why is he/she still commenting on RFAs and trolling AN/I?
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
QUOTE
Strong Oppose: The block log isn't clean, even though it is old. However what concerns me is your low activity in recent months and your edits on talk pages. You do not show understanding of the BLP policy. Does not seem to have learned from past mistakes (a key quality for admins).Jasper Deng (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Which edits are you concern about, JD? –BuickCenturyDriver 18:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
You don't edit talk pages enough.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Questions about my edits are discussed on my own talk page. I usually don't have questions about my mainspace edits and that's why article talkspace has a small slice on my edit count. This answers FetchComms's question above. –BuickCenturyDriver 18:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola emoticon - appalled.svg...I'm speechless. Swarm X 19:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose is now strong because of comment deletion (as in Reaper Eternal's question).Jasper Deng (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
That was due to an edit conflict, as stated above. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Shows a problem with handling edit conflicts.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Er, what? You do know what an edit conflict is, right? StrPby (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
JD, no matter that I say or what I do you're going to find a new reason why I can't function as a admin. I have no further comments for you. And yes SP, I know what an edit conflict is. I was using my portable computer and I pressed back on my browser after JDs comments before I read them. My new edits probably overwrote his. I had no intention of deleting his comments. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
As the indenting shows, I directed that question at Jasper, not you. StrPby (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
Also, note how Fastily uses the word "dearth". Will that help with your OTRS-filled retirement, hmmm?
Group: Contributors
Posts: 47
Joined:
From: Ohio
Member No.: 42,413
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 13th April 2011, 9:20pm)
Plus: If Fastily quit last year, why is he/she still commenting on RFAs and trolling AN/I?
It looks like Fastily's "retirement" amounts to nothing more than an excuse to spend zero time actually contributing to Wikipedia articles while still participating in all the worthless drama. I imagine many active admins wish they could do this but begrudgingly edit an article here and there to demonstrate that they're present "to improve the encyclopedia." The retired tag removes any semblance of that obligation.
I believe this is also known as "pulling a Balloonman."
This post has been edited by Ego Trippin' (Part Two):
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
QUOTE
Strong Oppose: The block log isn't clean, even though it is old. However what concerns me is your low activity in recent months and your edits on talk pages. You do not show understanding of the BLP policy. Does not seem to have learned from past mistakes (a key quality for admins).Jasper Deng (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Which edits are you concern about, JD? –BuickCenturyDriver 18:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
You don't edit talk pages enough.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Questions about my edits are discussed on my own talk page. I usually don't have questions about my mainspace edits and that's why article talkspace has a small slice on my edit count. This answers FetchComms's question above. –BuickCenturyDriver 18:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola emoticon - appalled.svg...I'm speechless. Swarm X 19:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose is now strong because of comment deletion (as in Reaper Eternal's question).Jasper Deng (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
That was due to an edit conflict, as stated above. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Shows a problem with handling edit conflicts.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Er, what? You do know what an edit conflict is, right? StrPby (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
JD, no matter that I say or what I do you're going to find a new reason why I can't function as a admin. I have no further comments for you. And yes SP, I know what an edit conflict is. I was using my portable computer and I pressed back on my browser after JDs comments before I read them. My new edits probably overwrote his. I had no intention of deleting his comments. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
As the indenting shows, I directed that question at Jasper, not you. StrPby (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined:
Member No.: 15,651
QUOTE(melloden @ Wed 13th April 2011, 9:33pm)
QUOTE
Strong Oppose: The block log isn't clean, even though it is old. However what concerns me is your low activity in recent months and your edits on talk pages. You do not show understanding of the BLP policy. Does not seem to have learned from past mistakes (a key quality for admins).Jasper Deng (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Which edits are you concern about, JD? –BuickCenturyDriver 18:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
You don't edit talk pages enough.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Questions about my edits are discussed on my own talk page. I usually don't have questions about my mainspace edits and that's why article talkspace has a small slice on my edit count. This answers FetchComms's question above. –BuickCenturyDriver 18:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola emoticon - appalled.svg...I'm speechless. Swarm X 19:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose is now strong because of comment deletion (as in Reaper Eternal's question).Jasper Deng (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
That was due to an edit conflict, as stated above. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Shows a problem with handling edit conflicts.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Er, what? You do know what an edit conflict is, right? StrPby (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
JD, no matter that I say or what I do you're going to find a new reason why I can't function as a admin. I have no further comments for you. And yes SP, I know what an edit conflict is. I was using my portable computer and I pressed back on my browser after JDs comments before I read them. My new edits probably overwrote his. I had no intention of deleting his comments. –BuickCenturyDriver 23:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
As the indenting shows, I directed that question at Jasper, not you. StrPby (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
Also, note how Fastily uses the word "dearth". Will that help with your OTRS-filled retirement, hmmm?
Heh, this joker has a userbox on his page which says "This user acts like he/she is an administrator on the English Wikipedia but really isn't." - and, commendably, it appears to be true: *Zero articles created *Majority of edits to other users' talk pages - politicin', facepediabookin', pokin' and generally being useless.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 222
Joined:
Member No.: 18,566
Dumb RFA oppose®s are nothing new unfortunately. Anyone with an account is legitimately able to vote in a request, including people like DougsTech, "retired" editors such as Fastily who appears to use a stock opposition reason, and random people who have never voted on an RFA before or barely made any other edits.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
QUOTE(melloden @ Wed 13th April 2011, 10:33pm)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
This is the joker that templated me a few days ago for giving someone the WP:DICK (T-H-L-K-D) treatment at the WQA page. A charming little busybody.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 164
Joined:
Member No.: 39,458
QUOTE(Tarc @ Thu 14th April 2011, 2:51pm)
QUOTE(radek @ Thu 14th April 2011, 12:41am)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
This is the joker that templated me a few days ago for giving someone the WP:DICK (T-H-L-K-D) treatment at the WQA page. A charming little busybody.
Get your mind out of the gutter, I thought it needed a funny photo of someone tying a balloon in knots to make a funney animal (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined:
Member No.: 15,651
QUOTE(Tarc @ Thu 14th April 2011, 7:51am)
QUOTE(radek @ Thu 14th April 2011, 12:41am)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
This is the joker that templated me a few days ago for giving someone the WP:DICK (T-H-L-K-D) treatment at the WQA page. A charming little busybody.
Just want to note - I'm not the one who made the statement about minivans driving into any rivers - someone else did, and I copied it as part of the longer quotation.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
QUOTE(radek @ Thu 14th April 2011, 9:49am)
Just want to note - I'm not the one who made the statement about minivans driving into any rivers - someone else did, and I copied it as part of the longer quotation.
Editing fail on my part. Original post re-attributed to melloden.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
QUOTE(-DS- @ Thu 14th April 2011, 8:53am)
QUOTE(Tarc @ Thu 14th April 2011, 2:51pm)
QUOTE(radek @ Thu 14th April 2011, 12:41am)
Rather unfortunate that Jasper wasn't in that minivan that drove into the Hudson River yesterday. (No, that was not a threat, so don't call the police.)
This is the joker that templated me a few days ago for giving someone the WP:DICK (T-H-L-K-D) treatment at the WQA page. A charming little busybody.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 332
Joined:
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 3,542
I used to occasionally check in on RFAs and sometimes comment. People like that are a major reason why I stopped. The other main reason is that I got sick of what adminship is on WP: an achievement and status symbol.
I never planned on even trying for adminship, but participating in RFAs for a while only made it clearer why that was a good choice. It's not really even the process, IMO. It's the mind-numbingly bureaucratic participants, the popularity-contest nature of the thing, and the blatantly myopic denials of the obvious: "It's not a vote" and "Adminship is no big deal" were frequently cited whenever it became too apparent that everyone believes the opposite.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 47
Joined:
From: Ohio
Member No.: 42,413
QUOTE(Sxeptomaniac @ Thu 14th April 2011, 4:03pm)
It's not really even the process, IMO. It's the mind-numbingly bureaucratic participants, the popularity-contest nature of the thing, and the blatantly myopic denials of the obvious: "It's not a vote" and "Adminship is no big deal" were frequently cited whenever it became too apparent that everyone believes the opposite.
Yeah. A user might say that "adminship is no big deal" to support a candidate who's getting some opposition for inexperience. But that same user might turn around and oppose another candidate for not having enough experience to be trusted with adminship. As you say, it's a popularity contest.
As for "it's not a vote," the only thing that separates RfA from a straight vote is the fact that all the other voters can see your vote and try to harass you into changing it. On many occasions, I've seen supporters try to suppress opposing opinions by calling for them to be removed from the count.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
This is why I fully support stripping away the powers that admins have into their own individual little sections that you have to apply for, like how Rollback works. It's too bad the VandelFighter permission never gets off the ground, but that's because of the extreme admin opposition to the idea.
I mean, if you gave away their ability to block users, how can they consider themselves better than everyone else?
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
I think we really need a page on Mr. Jasper. He has just started this ANI report. I went and looked through a few of Snakefan55's edit wars and, i've found, that all the information he is attempting to add is correct, from a little searching of my own. Yes, he shouldn't be edit warring to keep the content in, but discussing on talk pages, but the fact that the reverters aren't even bothering to check whether the info is correct or not is really irksome.
2. He was in the middle of his ArbCom case when Risker blocked him, then oversighted anything that could shed light on the matter. Jimbo says he'll "recommend to the Committee that Rodhullandemu be allowed back provisionally" "upon presentation to him of real-world evidence that professional/medical help has been sought and followed for six months, and upon the recommendation of those professionals".
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
QUOTE(-DS- @ Tue 19th April 2011, 4:58pm)
2. He was in the middle of his ArbCom case when Risker blocked him, then oversighted anything that could shed light on the matter. Jimbo says he'll "recommend to the Committee that Rodhullandemu be allowed back provisionally" "upon presentation to him of real-world evidence that professional/medical help has been sought and followed for six months, and upon the recommendation of those professionals".
Wow, connecting WP with the real world??? Shocking. Before having sex, should I ask my doctor to tell her that my penis is long enough?
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
Rod apparently said some rather disagreeable things and made some threats against Arbcom, all of which Risker oversighted and Arbcom immediately closed the case as a indefinite block of Rod, without even dealing with what the case was about at all.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 164
Joined:
Member No.: 39,458
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 7:08pm)
Rod apparently said some rather disagreeable things and made some threats against Arbcom, all of which Risker oversighted and Arbcom immediately closed the case as a indefinite block of Rod, without even dealing with what the case was about at all.
Actually, they suspended it until April 7, then closed it a few days later.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
Rod made his comments after the suspension not before. I don't know the reason for the suspension originally. Probably some BS reason about his health or something.
No, it was meant to start up again on April 7, but then he made the comments that he did and Arbcom just blocked him and closed the case.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 1:08pm)
Rod apparently said some rather disagreeable things and made some threats against Arbcom, all of which Risker oversighted and Arbcom immediately closed the case as a indefinite block of Rod, without even dealing with what the case was about at all.
He was the star of an incredible video, in which he lectured a group of very grumpy old men on ageism in the RfA process. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 6:04pm)
QUOTE(-DS- @ Tue 19th April 2011, 12:58pm)
1. Who's Shappy?
He was the star of an incredible video, in which he lectured a group of very grumpy old men on ageism in the RfA process. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined:
Member No.: 9,267
QUOTE
Jimbo says he'll "recommend to the Committee that Rodhullandemu be allowed back provisionally" "upon presentation to him of real-world evidence that professional/medical help has been sought and followed for six months, and upon the recommendation of those professionals".
I hope that on principle, they ignore him. What more influence ought Jimbo to have than any other fairly non-productive editor?
If Rodhullandemu still reads this forum ... I came up with something far more useful for him to do with the last of his days.
Rod, and anyone else in his position, try volunteering as a moderator for your local, or even regional Freecycle Network groups.
Real people, real stuff, real community spirit ... you even get to do face to faces far more often.
QUOTE
Welcome! The Freecycle Networkâ„¢ is made up of 4,936 groups with 8,381,932 members around the world. It's a grassroots and entirely nonprofit movement of people who are giving (and getting) stuff for free in their own towns. It's all about reuse and keeping good stuff out of landfills. Each local group is moderated by local volunteers (them's good people). Membership is free. To sign up, find your community by entering it into the search box above or by clicking on 'Browse Groups' above the search box. Have fun!
This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy:
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
QUOTE(melloden @ Tue 19th April 2011, 2:07pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 6:04pm)
QUOTE(-DS- @ Tue 19th April 2011, 12:58pm)
1. Who's Shappy?
He was the star of an incredible video, in which he lectured a group of very grumpy old men on ageism in the RfA process. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
Links or it didn't happen.
No, really, who was he?
The video used to be online, but it was removed by a certain Ed Wynn lookalike on Arbcom. That was about two years ago.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 7:04pm)
He was the star of an incredible video, in which he lectured a group of very grumpy old men on ageism in the RfA process. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
I remember that video; a well-trained and rather formally dressed 12-year-old kid being prompted by his father in the background and supported by Newyorkbrad to his right. Bizarre.
Actually, as I explained to Silver last time he brought this up, Risker wasn't the one who oversighted the statements by RHE...
I was.
Unfortunately, when we tried to explain to Silver the situation on why the oversight was necessary (with Alison, and others who saw the statements trying to explain as well), he thought we were all persecuting him.
Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't.
I will say that Silver has got the timeline wrong.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
I don't think remembering who exactly oversighted the information is really necessary.
And I do understand why it was necessary within policy, I just think the policy is ignorant and wrong.
And if I have the timeline wrong, it's because no one really explained anything in any real detail. It took me forever to even get what I did out of you guys. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:07pm)
I don't think remembering who exactly oversighted the information is really necessary.
And I do understand why it was necessary within policy, I just think the policy is ignorant and wrong.
And if I have the timeline wrong, it's because no one really explained anything in any real detail. It took me forever to even get what I did out of you guys. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Arbcom were of course acting in Rod's best interest, we know this to be true because they told us so.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined:
Member No.: 1,200
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 5:23pm)
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:07pm)
I don't think remembering who exactly oversighted the information is really necessary.
And I do understand why it was necessary within policy, I just think the policy is ignorant and wrong.
And if I have the timeline wrong, it's because no one really explained anything in any real detail. It took me forever to even get what I did out of you guys. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Arbcom were of course acting in Rod's best interest, we know this to be true because they told us so.
And the rest is silence...
And that people who actually, you know, saw the statement agreed that it was oversighted for a good reason.
But that's just a minor flaw in your argument for a reason?
Talk about a catch 22. If we talk about the reason it was oversighted, then you'd blast us for treating RHE poorly by revealing real life issues. If we don't, we're hiding something from everyone.
And Silver: Do you have a reason to know this other then you can't stand not knowing the exact particulars of the issue? One would think that how things turned out (with RHE's appeal to Jimbo and Jimbo's modification), you'd be able to put 2 and 2 together and not get Pi.
If we talk about the reason it was oversighted, then you'd blast us for treating RHE poorly by revealing real life issues. If we don't, we're hiding something from everyone.
I cannot think of a better reason for getting rid of personal Talk Pages altogether. Conversations should be limited to Article Discussion pages and noticeboards. Leave the chat to Facebook.
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:41pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 5:23pm)
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:07pm)
I don't think remembering who exactly oversighted the information is really necessary.
And I do understand why it was necessary within policy, I just think the policy is ignorant and wrong.
And if I have the timeline wrong, it's because no one really explained anything in any real detail. It took me forever to even get what I did out of you guys. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Arbcom were of course acting in Rod's best interest, we know this to be true because they told us so.
And the rest is silence...
And that people who actually, you know, saw the statement agreed that it was oversighted for a good reason.
But that's just a minor flaw in your argument for a reason?
To repeat... "Arbcom were of course acting in Rod's best interest, we know this to be true because they told us so."
If you choose to accept the poisoned chalice of Arbcom membership then you really must expect to be constantly in the wrong. This is the essence of your role, you give the necessary distractions for the 'pedia populace.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:55pm)
I cannot think of a better reason for getting rid of personal Talk Pages altogether. Conversations should be limited to Article Discussion pages and noticeboards. Leave the chat to Facebook.
I think that's a difficult one. I saw at least some of what RHE was posting on his talk page and it was disturbing. But talk pages can also be rallying points, provide feedback, offer encouragement ... nobody's obliged to read them anyway, so if you don't like 'em don't read 'em.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness on others himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:44pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
"and the lesson today is how to die!"
Are you seriously suggesting that anyone apparently announcing their imminent suicide is a fit person to be a wikipedia administrator?
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,332
Joined:
From: Erewhon
Member No.: 16,621
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 3:44pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:47pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:44pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
"and the lesson today is how to die!"
Are you seriously suggesting that anyone apparently announcing their imminent suicide is a fit person to be a wikipedia administrator?
Of course. I see no incompatibility. If anything, I'd hope suicidal admins was an increasing Wikipedia trend.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:51pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:47pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:44pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
"and the lesson today is how to die!"
Are you seriously suggesting that anyone apparently announcing their imminent suicide is a fit person to be a wikipedia administrator?
Of course. I see no incompatibility. If anything, I'd hope suicidal admins was an increasing Wikipedia trend.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:49pm)
QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 3:44pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:42pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 19th April 2011, 11:07pm)
All seriousness aside, I do feel bad for RHE...if he is reading this, I hope that real life is showing him a lot more happiness than the Wiki variety has been dumping on him.
To be fair, he dumped a whole load of unhappiness himself, so hopefully he's learned a lesson.
Jimbo says he'll "recommend to the Committee that Rodhullandemu be allowed back provisionally" "upon presentation to him of real-world evidence that professional/medical help has been sought and followed for six months, and upon the recommendation of those professionals".
That's no good; it clearly violates WP:V. We need a statement in a Reliable Source, which of course excludes foreign newspapers.
Jimbo says he'll "recommend to the Committee that Rodhullandemu be allowed back provisionally" "upon presentation to him of real-world evidence that professional/medical help has been sought and followed for six months, and upon the recommendation of those professionals".
That's no good; it clearly violates WP:V. We need a statement in a Reliable Source, which of course excludes foreign newspapers.
Perhaps they are finally realising that it is time to take adminship seriously, as in Real World seriously. It's more than just a 'mop and a bucket' when someone puts the bucket on their head and waves around the mop handle-outwards at people, occasionally actually charging. Maybe they will start thinking about making their Admin Army less of a privileged award to all pathologically-loyal and suitably courruptable volunteers, and perhaps something more like a optional stint of National Service to people who are really into building a fair and honest encyclopedia. And of course pigs will fly - no change is always the 'wisest' route at Wikipedia.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Wed 20th April 2011, 9:45am)
Perhaps they are finally realising that it is time to take adminship seriously, as in Real World seriously. It's more than just a 'mop and a bucket' when someone puts the bucket on their head and waves around the mop handle-outwards at people, occasionally actually charging. Maybe they will start thinking about making their Admin Army less of a privileged award to all pathologically-loyal and suitably courruptable volunteers, and perhaps something more like a optional stint of National Service to people who are really into building a fair and honest encyclopedia. And of course pigs will fly - no change is always the 'wisest' route at Wikipedia.
The answer to Wikipedia’s dilemma is simple: put good-looking people in charge.
I think the Wikipedia mob community is moving in the right direction: In the last Arbcom election, the new arbitrators included the blonde muscular Viking Xeno, the swashbuckling Royal Navy officer Chase Me, and the shapely pasties-shaking sexpot Shell Kinney. After years of flab and drab on Arbcom, people can now look at that committee with unapologetic carnal pleasure.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 716
Joined:
Member No.: 6,776
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 20th April 2011, 6:55pm)
QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Wed 20th April 2011, 9:45am)
Perhaps they are finally realising that it is time to take adminship seriously, as in Real World seriously. It's more than just a 'mop and a bucket' when someone puts the bucket on their head and waves around the mop handle-outwards at people, occasionally actually charging. Maybe they will start thinking about making their Admin Army less of a privileged award to all pathologically-loyal and suitably courruptable volunteers, and perhaps something more like a optional stint of National Service to people who are really into building a fair and honest encyclopedia. And of course pigs will fly - no change is always the 'wisest' route at Wikipedia.
The answer to Wikipedia’s dilemma is simple: put good-looking people in charge.
I think the Wikipedia mob community is moving in the right direction: In the last Arbcom election, the new arbitrators included the blonde muscular Viking Xeno, the swashbuckling Royal Navy officer Chase Me, and the shapely pasties-shaking sexpot Shell Kinney. After years of flab and drab on Arbcom, people can now look at that committee with unapologetic carnal pleasure.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 20th April 2011, 5:55pm)
The answer to Wikipedia’s dilemma is simple: put good-looking people in charge.
I think the Wikipedia mob community is moving in the right direction: In the last Arbcom election, the new arbitrators included the blonde muscular Viking Xeno, the swashbuckling Royal Navy officer Chase Me, and the shapely pasties-shaking sexpot Shell Kinney. After years of flab and drab on Arbcom, people can now look at that committee with unapologetic carnal pleasure.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
QUOTE(melloden @ Wed 20th April 2011, 11:47pm)
Hmm ... RyRy and Ryan Postlethwaite come to mind, as does Phaedriel.
Postlethwaite's girlfriend was a real hot chili mama. Is she on Wikipedia? And are there any new photos of her online? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
Group: Regulars
Posts: 678
Joined:
Member No.: 7,398
Did you miss what this thread was about? It's about Shalom claiming some opposes are dumb, and then others chiming in about what is and isn't frivolous.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,740
Joined:
Member No.: 1,727
QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 9:08pm)
Did you miss what this thread was about? It's about Shalom claiming some opposes are dumb, and then others chiming in about what is and isn't frivolous.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 11:37pm)
frivolity on frivolity
just wondering why he waited until now to say that.
When you say "he" do you mean me? If so then the answer is that I have so many calls on my time that sometimes I miss your stupidity, and it takes me a while to catch up.
"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus
"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus
Dumb and dumber. Old fool!
Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?
"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus
Dumb and dumber. Old fool!
Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?
"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus
Dumb and dumber. Old fool!
Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?
"I have way more enemies than friends here, and those who try to chase me away, believing that they're in some kind of pack and manoeuvring for position (let's see if we can get Malleus blocked, that's worth RfA brownie points), ought to examine their consciences. "
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066
Ever noticed something about Mally? He marks a lot of iffy articles patrolled.
And then, within a few weeks, roughly 30-40% of them get deleted "out-of-process" by assorted admins. Meaning, I can't find AFDs or other discussions about them.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 1st May 2011, 1:30am)
Ever noticed something about Mally? He marks a lot of iffy articles patrolled.
And then, within a few weeks, roughly 30-40% of them get deleted "out-of-process" by assorted admins. Meaning, I can't find AFDs or other discussions about them.
Do you actually have any evidence to support your bile?
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 1:44am)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 1st May 2011, 1:30am)
Ever noticed something about Mally? He marks a lot of iffy articles patrolled.
And then, within a few weeks, roughly 30-40% of them get deleted "out-of-process" by assorted admins. Meaning, I can't find AFDs or other discussions about them.
Do you actually have any evidence to support your bile?
Do you have eyes? I think you can look it up yourself.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
QUOTE(melloden @ Sun 1st May 2011, 2:52am)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 1:44am)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 1st May 2011, 1:30am)
Ever noticed something about Mally? He marks a lot of iffy articles patrolled.
And then, within a few weeks, roughly 30-40% of them get deleted "out-of-process" by assorted admins. Meaning, I can't find AFDs or other discussions about them.
Do you actually have any evidence to support your bile?
Do you have eyes? I think you can look it up yourself.
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)
Dumb RFA oppose, FAIL
