| |
|
  |
Ryulong might be going to arbitration |
|
|
| victim of censorship |
Mon 31st August 2009, 7:16am
|

Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
     
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,146
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640

|
QUOTE(The Joy @ Mon 31st August 2009, 7:14am)  QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 31st August 2009, 3:06am)  I am happy this rodent as been removed as an AdministratorIt was this rodent that banned me when I was a legit editor who still believed the wiki lie. Message for Rodent Ryulong.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Ryulong certainly is in Wiki-Purgatory. He and Mythdon (T-C-L-K-R-D)
have been at it since his arb case ended. The community basically put a restraining order on Mythdon to keep him away from Ryulong. So far, it hasn't worked.  Yeah was reading it with some glee.... What a sad little manboy Ryulong is, petty and small
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LaraLove |
Mon 31st August 2009, 12:41pm
|

Wikipedia BLP advocate
     
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Alex @ Wed 25th March 2009, 1:46pm)  QUOTE(LaraLove @ Wed 25th March 2009, 12:16pm)  QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 25th March 2009, 5:45am)  QUOTE(Shalom @ Tue 24th March 2009, 7:43pm)  Here's the quotation from Raul654: QUOTE I have promoted Ryulong to sysop. While some might object that he was below 70% support (with 69.4%), I believe, based on my interactions with him, that he would make a good sysop, and it would be a mistake not to promote him. Raul654 06:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hilarity ensues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...t_69.4.25.21.3F What a perfect example of Raul's arrogant, corrupt and power-mongering personality. Can we get an RFAR against him for once? Well-deserved, but pointless. It would go nowhere. He holds way too much power and ArbCom wouldn't do jack to him. That's why you haven't seen a case against him. Perhaps because no one has bothered to. If people got up of their arse to make a case instead of coming here to spend their lives whining about how x admin is a bitch and ruined my life etc etc then we'd get a lot more done. I missed this until today, when it was bumped by the new posts. I was retired when this post was made, but even out of retirement, I'm bright enough to know Raul is an untouchable. As those here and elsewhere so often suggest, and is mentioned in this very thread by Greg, there are better things to spend one's time on, like a girlfriend (or, in my case, a boyfriend), and I'm in school now too. Studying > Wikipedia. Anyone who goes after Raul is wasting their time, but they'd get my full support regardless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nerd |
Mon 31st August 2009, 1:42pm
|

Über Member
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 672
Joined: Sat 30th May 2009, 7:52pm
From: Cloud cuckoo land
Member No.: 11,945

|
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Mon 31st August 2009, 1:41pm)  I was retired when this post was made, but even out of retirement, I'm bright enough to know Raul is an untouchable... Anyone who goes after Raul is wasting their time, but they'd get my full support regardless.
Oh, I don't know. People used to say Jayjg was untouchable too. Things change, just very, very slowly. What goes around comes around, as they say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| victim of censorship |
Mon 31st August 2009, 3:36pm
|

Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
     
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,146
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640

|
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Mon 31st August 2009, 12:41pm)  QUOTE(Alex @ Wed 25th March 2009, 1:46pm)  QUOTE(LaraLove @ Wed 25th March 2009, 12:16pm)  QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 25th March 2009, 5:45am)  QUOTE(Shalom @ Tue 24th March 2009, 7:43pm)  Here's the quotation from Raul654: QUOTE I have promoted Ryulong to sysop. While some might object that he was below 70% support (with 69.4%), I believe, based on my interactions with him, that he would make a good sysop, and it would be a mistake not to promote him. Raul654 06:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hilarity ensues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...t_69.4.25.21.3F What a perfect example of Raul's arrogant, corrupt and power-mongering personality. Can we get an RFAR against him for once? Well-deserved, but pointless. It would go nowhere. He holds way too much power and ArbCom wouldn't do jack to him. That's why you haven't seen a case against him. Perhaps because no one has bothered to. If people got up of their arse to make a case instead of coming here to spend their lives whining about how x admin is a bitch and ruined my life etc etc then we'd get a lot more done. I missed this until today, when it was bumped by the new posts. I was retired when this post was made, but even out of retirement, I'm bright enough to know Raul is an untouchable. As those here and elsewhere so often suggest, and is mentioned in this very thread by Greg, there are better things to spend one's time on, like a girlfriend (or, in my case, a boyfriend), and I'm in school now too. Studying > Wikipedia. Anyone who goes after Raul is wasting their time, but they'd get my full support regardless. Raul should be thrown in jail
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Apathetic |
Mon 31st August 2009, 7:09pm
|
Über Member
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 594
Joined: Sun 3rd Aug 2008, 7:36pm
Member No.: 7,383
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(LaraLove @ Mon 31st August 2009, 1:18pm)  QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 31st August 2009, 11:36am)  Raul should be thrown in jail. For what crime, exactly? Crimes Against Featured Articles: Discrimination against Jenna Jameson! (but Gropecunt Lane is just fine, oHH k!) This post has been edited by Apathetic: Mon 31st August 2009, 7:11pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |